never had a one night stand

[carhill]

No one suggested that they do....

 

The topic is about never having one night stands and you and some other posters got onto Wogs about his personal married life. Off-topic and a personal attack besides. Wanna keep going?

[Crazy Magnet]

I personally do not find a man who has a promiscuous past to be attractive, so hooray to you OP!

 

There are two things which really bug me about my current BF. The first is that he had a ONS in the year before we started dating. Prior to that, he had only had sex in relationships and I do wish he would have kept it that way, it would have made him a lot sexier. The second, is that he has told me that the woman he dated for several years before me was extremely casual with sex and basically slept with anybody. To me, the fact that he would consider dating a woman like that is rather gross. I personally turn down men who have the same type of past and it bothers me that he was so willing to overlook her clear lack of intimacy for so long. It baffles me that he was shocked that in the end he got burned b/c she remained unwilling to commit.

 

But I digress. The point of this is, I do not enjoy sex without intimacy and I prefer partners who have that same value. I don't have ONSs and I don't want partners that have ONSs either.

[marsle85]

The topic is about never having one night stands and you and some other posters got onto Wogs about his personal married life. Off-topic and a personal attack besides. Wanna keep going?

 

The ongoing discussion is hardly a personal attack. Firstly, Woggles introduced his married life and integrated it into our conversation, and secondly- we approached his views as any other poster would. I understand you sympathize with him as a man, but that doesn't mean his outrageous, radical expressions are any less offensive to us as women. Further, they should be targeted- as they are merely just that: extreme and offensive.

[carhill]

Lady, you're attacking a poster personally, saying he's 'mostly' not sociopathic. That's such a typical female manipulative comment I can't even begin to express my outrage. We're done. You folks are nothing and I'll make sure appropriate action is taken. That's all.

[Twenty-ten]

Edit: Not worth the hassle actually. That was off topic on my part too, and I would rather not contribute to this.

 

Back to the topic, all the ladies that keep coming on here are all saying the same thing, we don't find ONSs and our men who participate in them attractive in any shape way or form.

Edited May 18, 2010 by Twenty-ten

[carhill]

Nice try, but the thread has already been reported. I stayed on-topic from post number one. I do not tolerate personal attacks and will continue to be vociferous about it. You forgot to include the off-topic and personal attack comments which prompted my responses. I know what's going on here and am just figuring out which posters are recycled. It'll all work out. Hope the OP got the answers he's looking for.

[marsle85]

Lady, you're attacking a poster personally, saying he's 'mostly' not sociopathic. That's such a typical female manipulative comment I can't even begin to express my outrage. We're done. You folks are nothing and I'll make sure appropriate action is taken. That's all.

 

Firstly, you can't quote a SINGLE line from someone's post, and expect it not to be taken out of context. I said:

 

I think you and what you believe is real to you, yes... but I think you're also unwilling to expand past your limited ideals on men, and "mostly" women. Just because you don't account men's cheating to theories dating prior to to the 16th century doesn't make you all fair and mighty... it means you're not "mostly" a sociopath.

 

He was expecting to be applauded on his "forward thinking," (that men's urge to cheat wasn't based on biological need to spread his seed) and naturally, I remarked that I wasn't impressed. That's like someone saying, "Unlike most doctors, I don't think leeches should be used to cure blood diseases". Both comments are obviously based on outdated theory, and do not present a compelling argument. Anyone relying on social or medical concepts from the 16th century would be a sociopath: someone who lacks a sense of moral responsibility or social conscience.

 

Furthermore, I have been exceedingly fair with my appraisal of Woggle- my critique is almost always paired with an expression of sympathy for his past, maybe I'm not as tolerant as you- but his views can hardly be considered tolerant of women.

[Feelin Frisky]

.... After you bust the first and only thing you think about for the rest of the night is how to get this random club whore out of your apartment.

 

Truer words were never spoken.

[carhill]

And thanks for the reminder why I'll never have a one night stand. Phew.....and I just read in another thread (on infidelity) how men lie to get free sex. Yep, men, generally, men. More one night stand fodder. OP, hope you never go there, seriously. Why expose yourself to what you've seen in this thread?

[Tony]

Sadly, very few of the last 50 posts in this thread have addressed the topic specifically and some were actually personal attacks. Thank all of you who participated in an on topic fashion. I do hope the OP was able to get something out of the thread. It's now closed.