troggleputty Posted April 11, 2010 Posted April 11, 2010 There was a rather long yet very interesting thread that went on for a while called "Individual Counseling" recently, started by Samantha0905. I looked around for an update, and mysteriously, the entire thread seems to have vanished into the ether. I'm wondering what happened to it, if anyone knows. Did Samantha's husband possibly snoop on her computer, find out about LS and the thread, and then ask her to have it pulled, because much of the thread contains a lot of personal info about Samantha and her husband? Or, is there some other reason? I don't really think it's appropriate for a thread like that to just vanish with no explanation. Maybe Tony knows what happened to it.
califnan Posted April 11, 2010 Posted April 11, 2010 You know Troggleputty, that is a very good question.. There had not been any posts on it for over a week? .. But I thought it was still on there - until I just looked.. All I know is Samantha's writings were elaborate, well written, terrible interesting ... And your responses to her were extensive analogy .. and many times appeared to be tongue in cheek hilarious .. Sometimes blunt, can save a person's future, to keep them from having to experience life the hard way, with mistakes.. I will look for her to post, and then ask her..
Author troggleputty Posted April 11, 2010 Author Posted April 11, 2010 You know Troggleputty, that is a very good question.. There had not been any posts on it for over a week? .. But I thought it was still on there - until I just looked.. All I know is Samantha's writings were elaborate, well written, terrible interesting ... And your responses to her were extensive analogy .. and many times appeared to be tongue in cheek hilarious .. Sometimes blunt, can save a person's future, to keep them from having to experience life the hard way, with mistakes.. I will look for her to post, and then ask her.. Well Samantha is unusually insightful and articulate and the entire thread really made an interesting real-life story. I was kind of hoping to be able to follow along with it and eventually learn how everything turned out.
califnan Posted April 11, 2010 Posted April 11, 2010 Well Samantha is unusually insightful and articulate and the entire thread really made an interesting real-life story. I was kind of hoping to be able to follow along with it and eventually learn how everything turned out. ---------------------- Yes she is insightful and articulate.. In one of her latter posts she was talking about spending the summer in their beach house.. I had thought that may have been the beginning of a turn in her life - to go one way or the other .. sort of the fork in the road .. Samantha: .. Are you there for our sequal ..
Author troggleputty Posted April 11, 2010 Author Posted April 11, 2010 Well, to be cynical, the most likely scenario is that her H had a keylogger on the computer she was using. And/or maybe figured out she was posting on LS and was able to read the thread. Alternatively, her H may have hired a P.I. who figured out how to hack into her computer. She disclosed a lot in her thread which might not look very good for her if it came out in a divorce proceeding. Her H sounds like a very "prideful" man. He might have been willing to get through things and try to save the marriage as long as Samantha's A was kept private. However once he found out (speculating here) that Samantha was telling everyone on the internet about it, thousands, millions of perfect strangers, that might have been the straw that breaks the camel's back. I can easily envision 1) her H contacting LS and demanding that the thread be pulled and/or 2) Samantha herself deciding that it would be best for her interests to have the thread pulled. So, since the thread is now gone, I guess none of the events described in it ever really happened.
califnan Posted April 11, 2010 Posted April 11, 2010 In the last few days, another member disclosed that she had had her past thread pulled because of her job.. so I guess it surely is possible for LS to delete for a member. I am going to say that it was Samantha who had them deleted. It must have been very important because she is an extremely sharing person .. Somehow I think her husband would be in another world when it comes to this sort of thing .. Aside from family, his life seemed to be work and golf. And yes it's true, there was some marital history on there.. She even took the trouble to post conversations back and forth between the two of them .. very detail minded .. I have to laugh just thinking of the manner in which she posted them .. ha
WalkInThePark Posted April 12, 2010 Posted April 12, 2010 There was a rather long yet very interesting thread that went on for a while called "Individual Counseling" recently, started by Samantha0905. I looked around for an update, and mysteriously, the entire thread seems to have vanished into the ether. I'm wondering what happened to it, if anyone knows. Did Samantha's husband possibly snoop on her computer, find out about LS and the thread, and then ask her to have it pulled, because much of the thread contains a lot of personal info about Samantha and her husband? Or, is there some other reason? I don't really think it's appropriate for a thread like that to just vanish with no explanation. Maybe Tony knows what happened to it. I guess you regret the fact that you have no longer that topic to attack Samantha personally...
WalkInThePark Posted April 12, 2010 Posted April 12, 2010 She disclosed a lot in her thread which might not look very good for her if it came out in a divorce proceeding./QUOTE] You would have liked that, wouldn't you?
califnan Posted April 12, 2010 Posted April 12, 2010 I guess you regret the fact that you have no longer that topic to attack Samantha personally... ---------------------- Walk, I thought Troggle's analytical comments could have spared her Grief down the road ..
califnan Posted April 12, 2010 Posted April 12, 2010 She disclosed a lot in her thread which might not look very good for her if it came out in a divorce proceeding./QUOTE] You would have liked that, wouldn't you? ------------------ Again, I felt Troggle's analysis in speaking for both sides - could have helped to avoid a divorce ..
BB07 Posted April 12, 2010 Posted April 12, 2010 I guess you regret the fact that you have no longer that topic to attack Samantha personally... I was thinking the exact same thing. I find it beyond strange and bizarre that troggleputty had such a deep interest in Samantha's story and took so much time to write out such elaborate replies. What's the real deal troggleputty? Why did you take such a personal interest in her thread?
jennie-jennie Posted April 12, 2010 Posted April 12, 2010 ---------------------- Walk, I thought Troggle's analytical comments could have spared her Grief down the road .. How? She has him on ignore. Funny to waste all that time on someone who is not even reading your posts.
califnan Posted April 12, 2010 Posted April 12, 2010 How? She has him on ignore. Funny to waste all that time on someone who is not even reading your posts. --------------------- I know Jennie.. She made the choice .. And it has been - and will continue to be the choices.. There were a lot of readers, aside from the posters - so maybe seeds do implant themselves ..
jennie-jennie Posted April 12, 2010 Posted April 12, 2010 (edited) I was thinking the exact same thing. I find it beyond strange and bizarre that troggleputty had such a deep interest in Samantha's story and took so much time to write out such elaborate replies. What's the real deal troggleputty? Why did you take such a personal interest in her thread? It seems really obsessive to me to post that excessively to someone who has clearly stated having no interest in your posts. I too wonder: What's the real deal, troggleputty? Edited April 12, 2010 by jennie-jennie
Author troggleputty Posted April 13, 2010 Author Posted April 13, 2010 I guess you regret the fact that you have no longer that topic to attack Samantha personally... That's a strange comment, given that I never attacked Samantha. On the contrary, she attacked me, but I was still entirely civil to her. And, you're attacking me now. You should stop it. If you don't have something constructive to add, why are you taking potshots at others?
Author troggleputty Posted April 13, 2010 Author Posted April 13, 2010 How? She has him on ignore. Funny to waste all that time on someone who is not even reading your posts. I don't feel I'm wasting my time when I post at LS. If you feel differently, then you should stop posting.
Author troggleputty Posted April 13, 2010 Author Posted April 13, 2010 She disclosed a lot in her thread which might not look very good for her if it came out in a divorce proceeding./QUOTE] You would have liked that, wouldn't you? What is it that you think I would have liked? That the truth about samantha's conduct and attitudes could have been disclosed if she gets divorced and what she wrote at LS ends up in court? I mean after all--she couldn't really disavow her own words, right? I guess the corollary is that you would NOT have liked for samantha to be held to her own words, where it might really count, i.e. in real life, not just on the internet? IOW you would not wish for her to tell the truth in the event of the dissolution of her marriage? Why is it that you are so seemingly spiteful about the notion that the truth about samantha might be disclosed, via her own words? It sounds like you are saying that it's a better outcome if samantha continues to dissimulate and prevaricate to her husband and family about her situation. OK you are certainly entitled to your opinion, and I completely understand why--you're a cheater, too. If you want to vote in favor of untruthfulness, you're permitted to do so. But why do you find it strange or unusual that an honest person such as myself might feel differently than you do?
Owl Posted April 13, 2010 Posted April 13, 2010 If you believe that morals are relative and not absolute...how do you reconcile situations where your morals intrude or conflict with those of others, and vice versa? How do you manage when someone else's morals and beliefs impinge upon your freedoms? Even more importantly (in my book)...how do you work things out when your morals and beliefs intrude on someone else's rights and freedoms?
jennie-jennie Posted April 13, 2010 Posted April 13, 2010 If you believe that morals are relative and not absolute...how do you reconcile situations where your morals intrude or conflict with those of others, and vice versa? How do you manage when someone else's morals and beliefs impinge upon your freedoms? Even more importantly (in my book)...how do you work things out when your morals and beliefs intrude on someone else's rights and freedoms? This sounds like an interesting subject for a new thread. I suggest you start a new thread, so we don't thread jack this one.
ladydesigner Posted April 13, 2010 Posted April 13, 2010 It's a simple, but not an easy choice: Do you live an honest life, or a dishonest one? Samantha chose to live a dishonest one, and it created nothing but problems for her, which probably are still on going. You're no different--you've made the choice to live a completely dishonest life in your personal relationships, trumpeting that it's satisfactory to you. How can a dishonest life be satisfactory? Unless you want to concede you're a completely dishonest person, it can't be satisfactory. That's why you're here. That's why you're at LS. You know you need to break free of what you've created for yourself but you can't do it by yourself. You're afraid of the truth. The truth might mean you have to spend your life by yourself. You don't want to do that. You'd rather spend your life in a compromised, dishonest relationship then be alone. This totally hit home for me. I have lived an honest life up until my A. I then became a dishonest person because of my own weaknesses. I can truly say that it turned my life upside down so I would have to agree that by my becoming a dishonest person has indeed proved to be unsatisfactory.
silverfish Posted April 14, 2010 Posted April 14, 2010 What is it that you think I would have liked? That the truth about samantha's conduct and attitudes could have been disclosed if she gets divorced and what she wrote at LS ends up in court? I mean after all--she couldn't really disavow her own words, right? I guess the corollary is that you would NOT have liked for samantha to be held to her own words, where it might really count, i.e. in real life, not just on the internet? IOW you would not wish for her to tell the truth in the event of the dissolution of her marriage? Why is it that you are so seemingly spiteful about the notion that the truth about samantha might be disclosed, via her own words? It sounds like you are saying that it's a better outcome if samantha continues to dissimulate and prevaricate to her husband and family about her situation. OK you are certainly entitled to your opinion, and I completely understand why--you're a cheater, too. If you want to vote in favor of untruthfulness, you're permitted to do so. But why do you find it strange or unusual that an honest person such as myself might feel differently than you do? Regarding the bolded part - it's interesting you describe yourself as an 'honest person' troggleputty. I have found you quite the opposite - you have revealed nothing of yourself and therefore cannot possibly be judged as either honest or dishonest as far as your posts on LS are concerned under either this or previous names There's very little that Samantha posted that would affect her divorce -- she told her H she cheated already.
silverfish Posted April 14, 2010 Posted April 14, 2010 That's a strange comment, given that I never attacked Samantha. On the contrary, she attacked me, but I was still entirely civil to her. And, you're attacking me now. You should stop it. If you don't have something constructive to add, why are you taking potshots at others? You did attack Samantha, to the point that she put you on ignore and asked to to stop posting on her threads. You continued to do so which is aggressive behaviour. She repeatedly asked you to stop commenting on this and also other threads she was participating in. I really hope that your behaviour doesn't mean that she doesnt come back here and post more.
califnan Posted April 14, 2010 Posted April 14, 2010 You did attack Samantha, to the point that she put you on ignore and asked to to stop posting on her threads. You continued to do so which is aggressive behaviour. She repeatedly asked you to stop commenting on this and also other threads she was participating in. I really hope that your behaviour doesn't mean that she doesnt come back here and post more. -------------------- Silver, forgive me for posting - since it wasn't directed to me - But I'm sure Troggleputty will respond to you as well .. I followed Samantha's thread .. I remember saying that she had put him on ignore, but I don't remember her specifically asking him to stop commenting on her thread, and other threads she was participating in.. If I remember correctly, it had been days since Troggle posted on Samantha's thread (maybe about a week) .. before the thread was pulled. (Forgive me for butting in - but I am Trapped in the file room trying to clear it - who wouldn't want to be on LS) ..
Author troggleputty Posted April 15, 2010 Author Posted April 15, 2010 -------------------- Silver, forgive me for posting - since it wasn't directed to me - But I'm sure Troggleputty will respond to you as well .. I followed Samantha's thread .. I remember saying that she had put him on ignore, but I don't remember her specifically asking him to stop commenting on her thread, and other threads she was participating in.. If I remember correctly, it had been days since Troggle posted on Samantha's thread (maybe about a week) .. before the thread was pulled. (Forgive me for butting in - but I am Trapped in the file room trying to clear it - who wouldn't want to be on LS) .. I have to say that it's remarkable that anyone would think they could actually be so controlling as to attempt to prohibit someone else from posting in any thread on LS. People who think this way undoubtedly have trouble functioning in "real life relationships" because those kinds of attempts at control generally result in the social isolation of the person who is inclined to make them.
silverfish Posted April 16, 2010 Posted April 16, 2010 I have to say that it's remarkable that anyone would think they could actually be so controlling as to attempt to prohibit someone else from posting in any thread on LS. People who think this way undoubtedly have trouble functioning in "real life relationships" because those kinds of attempts at control generally result in the social isolation of the person who is inclined to make them. Refer you to my previous point troggleputty re : honesty - care to address that?
Recommended Posts