Thebob Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 ugly one for a tiny bit until she is really friendly to you, then she might introduce you to the other girls and you'll get to talk to them eventually. Or situate yourself near the hot ones but don't make it look obvious. Then ask them a random question and get involved with them socially. Thebob
MalachiX Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 Sorry but A Beautiful Mind lied to us and game theory isn't going to help you get laid. Unless you're at a math conference or something. Anyway, I'm usually more attracted to "cute" girls than hot ones so I probably wouldn't be as interested in the 'hottest" one anyway. In all liklihood, I'd pay the most attention to whatever girl a.) Was the most engaging to talk to b.) Seemed the most interested in me c.) Was the most attractive in my book (not rates highest on the hotness scale).
Trimmer Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 This is very much a game theory question. Very good point; that's how I saw it immediately. If you're a guy that would pick the most attractive, then you have no right to complain about the girl that picks the guy with the most money. I do believe you are the first one and (considering subsequent posts) the only one so far to bring up this money issue. If someone was complaining in this discussion about girls who pick guys with money, please quote it and I'll stand corrected. And interesting, I hope! Interested and interesting. It's no good if they're interested but are dull as dirt or stupid or both. Yeah, this may sound pretty blah, but I think that would guide my choice - the one I think would be most interesting. I"m not denying that looks will be a powerful first attractor, but smart, witty, and interesting are way up there, too. Just hope I can keep up! (ref: the joke about how I waited for a long time for the perfect woman - problem was, when I finally found her, she was waiting for the perfect man...)
Mme. Chaucer Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 Goodness. How about the one that you feel most personally drawn to? Attractiveness is not absolutely objective, is it?
Mr White Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 You arrive at a party, There are 4 girls in the room. Only 1 is super attractive, the other 2 are just attractive, and 1 is not very attractive at all. Who do you talk to and approach? Attractiveness alone won't be the deciding factor. The hotter, the better, but I'd never go for the hottest just because she's hot. Blah or grating personality quickly kills attraction and a hot girl may become instantly unremakable. Once a certain attractiveness treshold is met, attitude, personality and style trump physical hotness, and they can be discerned pretty quickly even just through observation. Just the other day i was at a party with at least 3 stunning girls. By the end of the party I no longer thought they were stunning, while some of the geeky/dorky ones were in the lead..
cooldudeinberlin Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 You should approach the group as a whole- not just one girl. That way you can get a feel for who is interested and who is not. If it's a small party, it should be easier to mingle, and much easier to engage them as a group. ABSOLUTELY, totally agree... group dynamics and being social within a group have far more benefits than trying to single someone out. Then again, Im not really sure about the nature of the question posed... just because you are at a party, is it really necessary to be hounding the chicks? Regardless of what their physical appearance, it doesnt necessarily mean you have to be "spreading your seed".... put the guns in the holster and relax... its a party... have a drink... approach the group, meet a few interesting people (both guys and women), have a few laughs... anything that comes from that is only a bonus.
Recommended Posts