St. Nick Posted February 21, 2010 Posted February 21, 2010 Me and my buddies have come to the conclusion that average-looking women make way better lovers than hot chicks. Average-looking chicks have better personalities, are more laidback, less stuck-up, and less 1-dimensional than women with the conventional beauty. Both my last girlfriend and the chick I currently want both have faces that are average-looking with makeup on at best, but bodies I dig, and great personalities to boot. I wouldn't trade them for any Kim K looking chick (Kim K is waaay overrated--and my buddies agree). My questions for the dudes: 1. Ever walked into a room full of women and been unimpressed by the hotties but then gotten real turned on by the average-looking chicks? 2. Do you agree that average-looking women have better personalities? 3. Ever really liked a woman with an average face but a great body?
USMCHokie Posted February 21, 2010 Posted February 21, 2010 1. Ever walked into a room full of women and been unimpressed by the hotties but then gotten real turned on by the average-looking chicks? Yes. But that is more an instinctual preference because I feel I have a fighting chance with the "average" ones. 2. Do you agree that average-looking women have better personalities? No. 3. Ever really liked a woman with an average face but a great body? Sure.
Alexz Posted February 21, 2010 Posted February 21, 2010 I think what's being addressed here is that women that wear lots of makeup and focus on their appearance are more superficial than those that focus more on themselves a whole. Not merely as an image. But I am very repulsed by women that wear lots of makeup and go to great lengths to make themselves look "pretty." I just like natural women that don't have enormous egos. I like women that take care of themselves (maintenance), but have decent personalities. I generally don't care about a woman's initial appearance. I guess I appreciate more of an emotional and mental connection.
alphamale Posted February 21, 2010 Posted February 21, 2010 looks have little to do with performance in the bedroom or personality
Balthazar Posted February 21, 2010 Posted February 21, 2010 1. No 2. Yes, on average they have better personalities...but then again, they need to... 3. Yes, a great body can go a long way. Alternatively, a great face will help a woman with an average body.
phineas Posted February 21, 2010 Posted February 21, 2010 There are different types of hot women. I've found that the higher maintenance princess types that are very beautiful are most likely to just lay there, not give head & even reject doggy style more often than not. they will also complain about being on top or basically not like anything but missionary. The more active hotties that wear little makeup and the cute low maintenance chicks have been way more fun. My personal experience.
Ninita Posted February 21, 2010 Posted February 21, 2010 I'm a straight girl so can't boast extensive experience of sleeping with women. However, I am average-looking (about 6 to 7, apparently) and more than one of the guys I've slept with tell me they never had such good sex. This doesn't seem to work with guys though. It's usually the sluttiest guys who are the best I think. That's a bit sad but I guess it's all that practice....
alphamale Posted February 21, 2010 Posted February 21, 2010 i haven't seen any corelation between how a chick looks and what shes like in the sack. sorry
marlena Posted February 21, 2010 Posted February 21, 2010 Well, I've noticed that average-looking men are often better in the sack than very handsome men. Not always, of course, but often enough. It's almost like they try to make up in bed for what they lack in appearance. They aim to please and are very unselfish. I would assume average girls are like that, too. So, yes, I believe there is a premise to this.
MalachiX Posted February 21, 2010 Posted February 21, 2010 I think it's more the difference between women who are stereo-typically hot and those who are just cute. In such cases, I'd always go for a cute girl. Women who have the classical hotness tend to be boring to me physically and mentally.
mem11363 Posted February 21, 2010 Posted February 21, 2010 Many/most guys who marry a really hot woman - over time they are too nice to her. They become conflict avoidant - this makes the princess factor even worse. Those guys end up in marriages which are sexually screwed up in a huge way. Marry a woman you think is your peer physically - a woman who does not have a major league princess complex and life is way way happier. Me and my buddies have come to the conclusion that average-looking women make way better lovers than hot chicks. Average-looking chicks have better personalities, are more laidback, less stuck-up, and less 1-dimensional than women with the conventional beauty. Both my last girlfriend and the chick I currently want both have faces that are average-looking with makeup on at best, but bodies I dig, and great personalities to boot. I wouldn't trade them for any Kim K looking chick (Kim K is waaay overrated--and my buddies agree). My questions for the dudes: 1. Ever walked into a room full of women and been unimpressed by the hotties but then gotten real turned on by the average-looking chicks? 2. Do you agree that average-looking women have better personalities? 3. Ever really liked a woman with an average face but a great body?
Author St. Nick Posted February 21, 2010 Author Posted February 21, 2010 Alexz and MalachiX, I agree with both of you. i haven't seen any corelation between how a chick looks and what shes like in the sack. sorry I have actually. I agree with phineas that many of the supermodel type chicks are boring in bed, while an average chick can be better in bed. I think the hot chicks don't give good performances because most dudes get off on their looks and don't even notice their boring sexual performances. I've even noticed in porn how the hot pornstars seem to have the lamest sex skills compared to the regular-looking one.
Wallace1 Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 (edited) There are different types of hot women. I've found that the higher maintenance princess types that are very beautiful are most likely to just lay there, not give head & even reject doggy style more often than not. they will also complain about being on top or basically not like anything but missionary. The more active hotties that wear little makeup and the cute low maintenance chicks have been way more fun. My personal experience. QFT. I've been rather shocked a few times by super hot girls with very lively/feisty personalities being INCREDIBLY tame in bed. That doesn't mean its because they are hot, but the ones I've been with have been noticeably different than "average" girls. Edited February 22, 2010 by Wallace1
Woggle Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 I often find the real looking women which is what I like to use instead of average tend to be better partners across the board.
Recommended Posts