Twenty-ten Posted February 4, 2010 Posted February 4, 2010 Actually it's not all that typical. However in this day and age if a man doesn't have some OPP many women think there's something wrong with him and moves on. You're wrong, considering all the virtual high fives sent out from men to the OP for what he did, signifies that it is still very typical for men to be and want to be sluts. I value above all in a man integrity and the fact that he has enough self respect not to act like a slut, I'm not a slut therefore I why would I want to be with a man who can't keep it in his pants? But the harsh reality is that a good portion of men are and always will be sluts because it is man's internal code to sleep around and feel rewarded rather than ashamed for it. I would never leave a man who doesn't sleep around I would very happily embrace him, unfortunately most men who don't sleep around tend to = "loser with no game" in society's eyes, so most men would not even admit to it even if they were still virgins. It is that stigma that men created by virtue of patting one another in the back for their many conquests and laughing at those who don't get any action, that makes a woman question a man when he is not some sort of himbo. Not the fact that women don't respect a man who has self respect, women actually crave that.
meerkat stew Posted February 4, 2010 Posted February 4, 2010 You're not down with OPP? OPP = other people's puxxy - Naughty by Nature Oh, then your prior post is non sequitur. Why should the party getting OPP necessarily pay for the party getting OPD as a matter of privilege of the party getting OPD? You are making my points for me.
angelaM Posted February 4, 2010 Posted February 4, 2010 Let me guess... she told you she can't get pregnant...
meerkat stew Posted February 4, 2010 Posted February 4, 2010 But the harsh reality is that a good portion of men are and always will be sluts because it is man's internal code to sleep around and feel rewarded rather than ashamed for it. Here's another harsh reality, it takes two to make a two-backed-beast, and for every male slut who contributes to one of those creatures, there's usually a female in the room contributing her share. Male sluts can't exist without female versions (for the most part), and at first date, one rarely knows what one is dealing with yet, so why an expectation that man always pays for what may be a chaste delicate flower or more likely may be someone no more or less slutty than he is?
Twenty-ten Posted February 4, 2010 Posted February 4, 2010 Oh, then your prior post is non sequitur. Why should the party getting OPP necessarily pay for the party getting OPD as a matter of privilege of the party getting OPD? You are making my points for me. I agree women who sleep around should pay their own way on dates, they don't take men seriously why should men take them seriously?
greatgirlfriend Posted February 4, 2010 Posted February 4, 2010 You're wrong, considering all the virtual high fives sent out from men to the OP for what he did, signifies that it is still very typical for men to be and want to be sluts. I value above all in a man integrity and the fact that he has enough self respect not to act like a slut, I'm not a slut therefore I why would I want to be with a man who can't keep it in his pants? But the harsh reality is that a good portion of men are and always will be sluts because it is man's internal code to sleep around and feel rewarded rather than ashamed for it. I would never leave a man who doesn't sleep around I would very happily embrace him, unfortunately most men who don't sleep around tend to = "loser with no game" in society's eyes, so most men would not even admit to it even if they were still virgins. It is that stigma that men created by virtue of patting one another in the back for their many conquests and laughing at those who don't get any action, that makes a woman question a man when he is not some sort of himbo. Not the fact that women don't respect a man who has self respect, women actually crave that. That's one of the reasons I hope my current relationship works out. His problems aside, he's no male slut. He takes sex very seriously and is the type that if he got a woman pregnant would marry her. He's probably been with less people than me. I'd never seriously date a guy who sleeps around. I want a monogamous man and if he sleeps around he won't be faithful.
Twenty-ten Posted February 4, 2010 Posted February 4, 2010 Here's another harsh reality, it takes two to make a two-backed-beast, and for every male slut who contributes to one of those creatures, there's usually a female in the room contributing her share. Male sluts can't exist without female versions (for the most part), and at first date, one rarely knows what one is dealing with yet, so why an expectation that man always pays for what may be a chaste delicate flower or more likely may be someone no more or less slutty than he is? Yes I understand it doesn't happen alone. The difference is that you are all sleeping with the same chick. Not the other way around. Putting our biases aside, how many males sluts do you think there are for female ones?
Crazy Magnet Posted February 4, 2010 Posted February 4, 2010 I forgot to suggest to the poster that he look into "other" online dating sites. If you're that hard up for sex dude, try adult friend finder. My xHubby always found PLENTY of ass there....and I do mean ASS. But if you're into the other hole, I hear that it is also readily available. Then, you can always skip that whole getting to know you think and go to instant sex whenever you like.
silic0ntoad Posted February 4, 2010 Posted February 4, 2010 I always thought adult friend finder was a joke. Are you telling me that nonsense actually gets people laid?
Author Barky Posted February 4, 2010 Author Posted February 4, 2010 (edited) try adult friend finder. I'm on that site, too, but there are about 50 men for every woman so it's a low-chance probability. I've had some fun with the women there too, no doubt. One of the girls I'm currently dating I met there, in fact, over a year ago. She contacted me, a couple days later we were in bed. Again, no phone convos... about 5 emails and 5 text messages. Pretty fast and no work other than trying to sound sexy and cool in emails. I think women still screen to a small extent. If you sound like a dork or non-sexy in emails (easy to do if you're not careful) then you're out. Good stuff. Edited February 4, 2010 by Barky
Twenty-ten Posted February 4, 2010 Posted February 4, 2010 there are about 50 men for every woman so it's a low-chance probability. That answers my question.
Author Barky Posted February 5, 2010 Author Posted February 5, 2010 I think revealing the site would be TMI. I'll tell ya it wasn't e-harmony though
Author Barky Posted February 5, 2010 Author Posted February 5, 2010 Actually it's not all that typical. However in this day and age if a man doesn't have some OPP many women think there's something wrong with him and moves on. Strange but true. Just as money makes money, women attract women. Once, about a year and a half ago, I slept with 4 women in one weekend. Actually it was 3.5. I banged some married chick on Saturday morning, had a first date who slept with me that evening. Then I went out with a chick the next afternoon who got naked and gave me a half-assed hand job but wouldn't have sex (the .5), and then banged a long term acquaintance that night to take the edge off. So I was telling a "just friends" chick I'd known for a long time all this and she was telling me what a "slut" I am and how appalled she was. Then she was like "Soooo... want to go out for dinner some time?" Funny as hell. It's why I always tell guys that for men at least, "Quantity leads to quality." The more women on your d***, the more women who want to get on. And as the quantity of women increases, so does the quality.
meerkat stew Posted February 5, 2010 Posted February 5, 2010 It's why I always tell guys that for men at least, "Quantity leads to quality." The more women on your d***, the more women who want to get on. And as the quantity of women increases, so does the quality. This is the most succinct and true estimation of how to attract women in modern day America I have ever seen. When it rains it pours. Have experienced this snowball effect myself several times in life, and many of my friends are walking proof of it, on both ends of the scale. You either have too many women or none, no middle ground. And to preempt, it's not just this way with skanky, whorish women. There's just something about a man with options and other women that attracts more and more women. It explains the saying that 10% of the guys are getting 90% of the sex, and also explains all the nice guy/beta threads here on this forum.
Ms. Joolie Posted February 5, 2010 Posted February 5, 2010 It's why I always tell guys that for men at least, "Quantity leads to quality." The more women on your d***, the more women who want to get on. And as the quantity of women increases, so does the quality. In a way, it applies to women as well. When we know how to work our sexuality, it is a very powerful tool. I think that there is a distinction between healthy sexuality and addictive or negative sexual behavior though.
CarrieT Posted February 5, 2010 Posted February 5, 2010 No phone talk at all? Straight from MSN to booty call? Interesting, have never heard of that happening, but then I'm old. I'm 45 and I've done it that way a handful of times. No more, though. The sex was never that good... Why on earth should a guy pay for -any- dates when so many women are doing this kind of stuff with guys who aren't taking them on dates? Why even date at all? Different priorities. Now I WANT to date but only seem to attract guys looking for booty calls. Some times I just want to get laid, but don't because of the morning-after regrets. But dating has been non-existent.
Twenty-ten Posted February 5, 2010 Posted February 5, 2010 It's why I always tell guys that for men at least, "Quantity leads to quality." The more women on your d***, the more women who want to get on. And as the quantity of women increases, so does the quality. No it doesn't, quantity leads to eventually falling for one of your easy lays. If that is what you consider quality then you have no standards. Decent worthwhile women are not attracted to male sluts, you will never get quality that way. You will only attract other trampy women who find promiscuous men exciting.
Twenty-ten Posted February 5, 2010 Posted February 5, 2010 I'm 45 and I've done it that way a handful of times. No more, though. The sex was never that good... Of course it wouldn't be good you are having sex with men who don't give a damn about you, they are there for a selfish act nothing more. Men can be very selfish more so when they don't have emotional ties. On the flip side having great sex with someone who does care is unmatchable when you have experienced enough of that you won't settle for less. Keep at it Carrie, you will find a decent man don't settle for less.
thegreatmoose Posted February 5, 2010 Posted February 5, 2010 Strange but true. Just as money makes money, women attract women. Once, about a year and a half ago, I slept with 4 women in one weekend. Actually it was 3.5. I banged some married chick on Saturday morning, had a first date who slept with me that evening. Then I went out with a chick the next afternoon who got naked and gave me a half-assed hand job but wouldn't have sex (the .5), and then banged a long term acquaintance that night to take the edge off. So I was telling a "just friends" chick I'd known for a long time all this and she was telling me what a "slut" I am and how appalled she was. Then she was like "Soooo... want to go out for dinner some time?" Funny as hell. It's why I always tell guys that for men at least, "Quantity leads to quality." The more women on your d***, the more women who want to get on. And as the quantity of women increases, so does the quality. You have no respect for anyone.
greatgirlfriend Posted February 5, 2010 Posted February 5, 2010 No it doesn't, quantity leads to eventually falling for one of your easy lays. If that is what you consider quality then you have no standards. Decent worthwhile women are not attracted to male sluts, you will never get quality that way. You will only attract other trampy women who find promiscuous men exciting. Agreed. I'd never date a guy who was a slut. Nope, because I'd often wonder if he was cheating on me (and he'd probably would be). In my 20's I was more into sex and had sex with guys I didn't love. Not strangers mind you, just fwb's. Now I want a man who is mine.
Author Barky Posted February 5, 2010 Author Posted February 5, 2010 Decent worthwhile women are not attracted to male sluts, you will never get quality that way. lulz.. you wish
Recommended Posts