b52s Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 Man, apparently this is a BOOMING industry, esp. with the internet and all. BUT.....you'd be surprised how many "average" women do this for the extra money. Some are even soccer moms, but not surprisingly college girls turn into prostitutes instead of working as a cashier at a Wal-Mart for the extra cash. SOME are even professional women, like the one interviewed was apparently a HIGH -END hooker.....that was a career woman that decided to do it for a couple of years. She was attracted to the idea of being "rebellious" and figured she'd give it a shot and prostitute herself to professional millionaire men. Then, apparently what caught my attention, prostitutes have certain "themes" their clients can pay for.....the famous one was the "Girlfriend Experience" Apparently, it's more than just being a prostitute, but acting interested in the guy who is with them.....then what really kind of surprised me is that even the prostitute must have some kind of "chemistry" with said male client in this setting. Sometimes the clients even buy prostitutes gifts. That being said, I often wonder if there's a fine line between prostitution in this case...or just a girlfriend who is a gold digger. Think about it....ever watch that reality show with the rich housewives of Orange County California? It was funny, I was watching it with my dad, and he says you might as well be marrying a prostitute. Because they're only in it for the money. But, I often wonder how often their husbands get sex. lol...NOW that they're married. Anyhow, back to reiterating my point.....isn't there a fine line between gold-digging girlfriend vs. a prostitute? I actually knew a friend's wife who had a sister that wasn't necessarily a prostitute....but might as well have been.....it was more of a bartering system. He'd buy her a car, she'd give him sex. A non-prostitute prostituting herself. Again...fine line, right?? Link to post Share on other sites
calizaggy Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 There almost always must be some sort of money transfer to have sex with most American women. Women eat everyday.. They might go out with friends and pay their share, a platonic guy and pay their share, but as soon as they are on date and the idea of sex is around, most American women are repulsed if it is suggested they pay their share. Link to post Share on other sites
mark982 Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 all marriage is, is legalised prostitution. Link to post Share on other sites
Author b52s Posted December 21, 2009 Author Share Posted December 21, 2009 all marriage is, is legalised prostitution. LOL....funny. Well, I have noticed a difference in prostitution and the Gold digging girlfriend is that with prostitution, straight money is exchanged....where as a gold digging g/f is more of a bartering thing. You buy her 1,000.00 necklace, she'll give you sex, you buy her nice things, you give her sex. Kind of reminds me when in the movie, "It's a Wonderful Life" where Harry Potter was trying to make an offer to him and what kind of good money he'd be making....he emphasized, "You can buy some nice things for your wife" lol Link to post Share on other sites
Author b52s Posted December 21, 2009 Author Share Posted December 21, 2009 It's a more recent phenomenon... With women's lib, it's now acceptable for young women to be out and about and to be "sexually empowered". See Girls Gone Wild. Girls willingly flashing their goodies on video for FREE. Now, add a little cash ($200 will do, sometimes even less), and the mixture is highly volatile. I've been telling guys in the this board: you want the girls, make the money. It's just a fact of 21st America. Look at the proliferation of pornography on the internet. Some of those girls are really 18, 19, 20. Teenagers. Lots and lots of them. All for a little cash. Considering the staggering number of them on video, imagine the number of them that are NOT on camera (but just some rich dude's gf). There is no line between girlfriend and prostitute anymore. It's a gradual continuum. A big gray zone. It's life. But be careful out there. You might end up shelling serious $$$ and get nothing, absolutely NOTHING in return. At least prostitutes are honest. Indeed, gone are the days of the REAL porn industry (in the 80's), and now with the internet, a girl in a college dorm sees an ad to do such things for money, perhaps enough to pay off her semester PLUS some spending money. Even amateurs can be stars. Link to post Share on other sites
Strych9 Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 Everything you stated is demonstrably true, but beware there are still women out there who don't give a **** about material assets. There's more to life than what you do to get more ****/stuff, and much more to life than the ****/stuff in your possession. It's no wonder this is all happening, men are seen as the financial providers and women are seen as objects of pleasure. All in all, it's a very degrading process. Keep in mind though, that some women will see a diamond for what it actually is, USELESS, but pretty. Just like these women on television. Link to post Share on other sites
Author b52s Posted December 21, 2009 Author Share Posted December 21, 2009 It's a more recent phenomenon... With women's lib, it's now acceptable for young women to be out and about and to be "sexually empowered". See Girls Gone Wild. Girls willingly flashing their goodies on video for FREE. Now, add a little cash ($200 will do, sometimes even less), and the mixture is highly volatile. I've been telling guys in the this board: you want the girls, make the money. It's just a fact of 21st America. Look at the proliferation of pornography on the internet. Some of those girls are really 18, 19, 20. Teenagers. Lots and lots of them. All for a little cash. Considering the staggering number of them on video, imagine the number of them that are NOT on camera (but just some rich dude's gf). There is no line between girlfriend and prostitute anymore. It's a gradual continuum. A big gray zone. It's life. But be careful out there. You might end up shelling serious $$$ and get nothing, absolutely NOTHING in return. At least prostitutes are honest. Yeah, that being said, there's 2 TYPES of women that do this kind of thing, ones that actually put out, and the others, where you spend money on them, and they won't Why not put out? I mean, you STILL get what you want, regardless. "He bought me this diamond necklace, little does he know that I'm not giving him any sex in return" Then are those who will at least keep the guy happy in return, "Yeah, I give him a little present this morning when I woke up with a necklace around my neck...no biggie" I mean, why not put out? It's only sex. Some women have no problem giving something in return...where as OTHERS do.....wonder why. So it's quite unfair to the guy who spent the money on THAT type of woman. Unless the only reason she isn't putting out to the guy thats spending money on her, is not physically attracted to him?? THe other, is attracted? Link to post Share on other sites
FilthMerchant Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 The female mating system stripped to its fundamentals IS prostitution. Females are biologically wired to seek out men with the ability to protect and provide, and men with good genes (characteristics that their biological instincts would like to see in their children). Any woman that thinks sex is something she gives to a man, even (and especially) the girls who wait 6 months to 'be sure' - you're a prostitute. Through and through. Link to post Share on other sites
Sam Spade Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 Any woman that thinks sex is something she gives to a man, even (and especially) the girls who wait 6 months to 'be sure' - you're a prostitute. Through and through. I am very tired of women treating sex as something "theirs" to "give away":rolleyes:. Not all, but most. Sad, sad, sad. Link to post Share on other sites
Woggle Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 At least prostitutes are honest about it. I remember when that Ashlee Dupree who was Elliot Spitzer's hooker was caught she said the only difference between her and your average wife was not at least she 100% honest about what she was doing and she is right. Many married women are simply with their men just for financial reasons but it's only the ones who are honest about their intentions that are stigmatized and criminalized. Link to post Share on other sites
FilthMerchant Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 At least prostitutes are honest about it. I remember when that Ashlee Dupree who was Elliot Spitzer's hooker was caught she said the only difference between her and your average wife was not at least she 100% honest about what she was doing and she is right. Many married women are simply with their men just for financial reasons but it's only the ones who are honest about their intentions that are stigmatized and criminalized. What about women who say that he couldn't support their lifestyle? Or much worse women who divorce the husbands and have them pay for their lifestyle? These women aren't stigmatized - other than how 'empowered' they are. Link to post Share on other sites
Woggle Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 What about women who say that he couldn't support their lifestyle? Or much worse women who divorce the husbands and have them pay for their lifestyle? These women aren't stigmatized - other than how 'empowered' they are. But a woman who is honest with a man and allows him to pay his fee and get on with his life is treated as a criminal. Link to post Share on other sites
Lizzie60 Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 I agree.. now days.. there are a lot of 'variety'... Like you said, there are the soccer moms, (suburban wives) who do it for some excitement on the side.. and money (which is nice for treats)... I think, more and more.. that kind of 'prostitution' is slowly replacing the typical 'prostitution' (drugs addicts, street prost.).. only the low-class men go for this kind.. (not the smart, successful guys, the risk is way too high for diseases..they're not stupid).. I also agree.. a lot of these women (especially when they're married to ugly billiionnaires, do it for the prestige of being the W of these ugly 'celebrities' therefore getting the rich and famous lifestyle in exchange of sex... but I still believe that, in some cases, some women do fall in love with these guys.. (because these guys are charismatic, intelligent, powerful, confident.. etc.). Link to post Share on other sites
Author b52s Posted December 21, 2009 Author Share Posted December 21, 2009 What about women who say that he couldn't support their lifestyle? Or much worse women who divorce the husbands and have them pay for their lifestyle? These women aren't stigmatized - other than how 'empowered' they are. Yeah, I have noticed in divorce courts that some men are sued for them to pay for their lifestyle...(they had no kids, so no issues there)....but typically a court will rule in the woman's favor if she can't support herself, that HE must support her with some kind of Alimony check. Link to post Share on other sites
betamanlet Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 Tiger's wife is seeking 300 million and full custody of the kids. This in exchange for what? 5 years of having sex with him? What did she bring to the marriage? Golf tips? nagging him to be a better golfer from her vast experience of being a model for 2 days and being a nanny? This is why marriage is SUCH a joke. She married him because he's rich and famous, and that's why he appeals to other women. To expect him to be faithful is like expecting Donald Trump to grow old with you. You deserve what you get when you marry for money. Also, prenups can be denied because, and it's very sexist, but the courts treat women like children and they can claim they didn't understand what they were doing. Link to post Share on other sites
betamanlet Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 What about women who say that he couldn't support their lifestyle? Or much worse women who divorce the husbands and have them pay for their lifestyle? These women aren't stigmatized - other than how 'empowered' they are. Men who marry women who have much less earning potential are at serious risk for divorce and being reemed in court, because you're expected to support a spouses (it does apply both ways, but very few women marry down, I do know of a woman who did have to pay spousal support to her separated husband) lifestyle. Link to post Share on other sites
Sam Spade Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 The only major advantage of wives over working girls is reproductive rights, which the latter cannot provide, so the former milk them for all it is worth . Link to post Share on other sites
Vintage79 Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 An example that is some what relevant. I just started at an MBA program at one of the top 2-3 programs - obviously the expected earnings post graduation are huge. When I roam around the city wearing regular clothes, I get some attention from the ladies - more from the typical jeans and t-shirt type girls - the normal ones that are frequently fun to hang out with. When I'm wearing clothing branded with my school/program name (which I get for free in droves), I get hit on practically non-stop, from both the jeans and a t-shirt type, but also those that are dressed to the nines and caked in make-up...probably 5 times as much interest by simply tossing on a particular t-shirt. Wearing the school gear, in essence is like advertising that you will be making some serious bank, and out of the woodwork they come...I doubt they realize that I'll be $150K in debt out of school. Regardless, it definitely speaks towards the "find a rich guy" mentality that is apparently frequently employed by the ladies...kind of sad. Link to post Share on other sites
tami-chan Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 Tiger's wife is seeking 300 million and full custody of the kids. This in exchange for what? 5 years of having sex with him? What did she bring to the marriage? Golf tips? nagging him to be a better golfer from her vast experience of being a model for 2 days and being a nanny? This is why marriage is SUCH a joke. She married him because he's rich and famous, and that's why he appeals to other women. To expect him to be faithful is like expecting Donald Trump to grow old with you. You deserve what you get when you marry for money. Also, prenups can be denied because, and it's very sexist, but the courts treat women like children and they can claim they didn't understand what they were doing. Well, I do not think you can put a price on carrying a baby for 9 months and giving birth to it....and she did it two times too! I know people who pay thousands and thousands of dollars for surrogate mothers plus the cost of prenatal care.... and every single one of these parents-to-be say, there really is no dollar amount for bringing a child into this world. The courts, of course have tried... but how can anyone ever really assign a dollar amount to the risks a woman takes each time she conceives and carries the baby to term-granted most pregnancies have no complications , still...it is a risk and life/lives are at stake. Plus, Elin was humiliated. I do not know if she married Tiger Woods for money-at least she was faithful to him, by all accounts....the least he could do, is to make her life easy and comfortable... Link to post Share on other sites
betamanlet Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 Well, I do not think you can put a price on carrying a baby for 9 months and giving birth to it....and she did it two times too! I know people who pay thousands and thousands of dollars for surrogate mothers plus the cost of prenatal care.... and every single one of these parents-to-be say, there really is no dollar amount for bringing a child into this world. The courts, of course have tried... but how can anyone ever really assign a dollar amount to the risks a woman takes each time she conceives and carries the baby to term-granted most pregnancies have no complications , still...it is a risk and life/lives are at stake. Plus, Elin was humiliated. I do not know if she married Tiger Woods for money-at least she was faithful to him, by all accounts....the least he could do, is to make her life easy and comfortable... So having children is something that should be financially compensated?These particular kids are worth $300,000,000 for her effort? I'm sure she married Tiger for his good looks, and if he worked in a server room for 40k a year, she would still have married him Something tells me her life was easy and comfortable. I mean, she has a island home in Sweden. I don't have an Island home, let alone a single home, and her claim to fame was being a nanny, so something tells me she didn't pay for that home on her own... What makes her worth 300,000,000 ??? Divide that how many hours they were married and that's apparently her hourly rate. If people want marriage to be taken seriously, they should stop treating is as legalized prostitution. Link to post Share on other sites
silic0ntoad Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 The marital system in the US is a joke, thus why I will never get married. I also will not live in a state that has "commonlaw marriages," another scandal. The courts are so absolutely skewed in favor of women when it comes to this that it doesn't make any sense, financially, or emotionally, to marry someone. To invest in them, and then have them make me pay them for the rest of their lives to maintain a lifestyle? If that's not completely preposterous IDK what is. How about this? Grow up, get a goddamned job and earn you way, just like the rich guys. If women want equality, it must be thoroughly equal, not partially and skewed to allow women to house men in court when it comes to divorce. In reality, the court system has created gold diggers. I would be willing to bet if some of these hollywood wives knew they couldn't take a man for 300 million after a divorce they wouldn't have married them in the first place. As far as Tiger Woods goes, I think he gets what he deserves. If you cheat, you should have your heart ripped out. But that money should go to the kids, not the wife. Link to post Share on other sites
ordinary_girl Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 So having children is something that should be financially compensated?These particular kids are worth $300,000,000 for her effort? I'm sure she married Tiger for his good looks, and if he worked in a server room for 40k a year, she would still have married him Something tells me her life was easy and comfortable. I mean, she has a island home in Sweden. I don't have an Island home, let alone a single home, and her claim to fame was being a nanny, so something tells me she didn't pay for that home on her own... What makes her worth 300,000,000 ??? Divide that how many hours they were married and that's apparently her hourly rate. If people want marriage to be taken seriously, they should stop treating is as legalized prostitution. I would generally agree with you but Tiger Woods is a bad example. As far as I know she is divorcing him because he f****d at least a dozen women during their marriage. maybe (who knows) they would have stayed together if he hadn't or if she had never found out. anyone that behaves like this deserves to be taken to the cleaners imo Link to post Share on other sites
betamanlet Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 I would generally agree with you but Tiger Woods is a bad example. As far as I know she is divorcing him because he f****d at least a dozen women during their marriage. maybe (who knows) they would have stayed together if he hadn't or if she had never found out. anyone that behaves like this deserves to be taken to the cleaners imo But say if she had cheated on him, and she had nothing to take him to the cleaners on, and she STILL gets half his stuff for cheating on him? She married him for the same reason the other women had sex with him as a married men. His status, power, and wealth. Link to post Share on other sites
ordinary_girl Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 But say if she had cheated on him, and she had nothing to take him to the cleaners on, and she STILL gets half his stuff for cheating on him? She married him for the same reason the other women had sex with him as a married men. His status, power, and wealth. they had a prenuptial agreement for I think for 40 million. I'm not sure whether she would have been able to break those conditions if she had cheated or had other reasons. ... and he has been taking advantage of his power fully too. he didn't have to marry a model. he could have picked a nice, shy, quiet girl. he didn't. it's the choices you make in life. Link to post Share on other sites
betamanlet Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 they had a prenuptial agreement for I think for 40 million. I'm not sure whether she would have been able to break those conditions if she had cheated or had other reasons. ... and he has been taking advantage of his power fully too. he didn't have to marry a model. he could have picked a nice, shy, quiet girl. he didn't. it's the choices you make in life. She's not a model, she's was a nanny. She's a regular person who got by on her looks and married a rich guy. She might have worked a DAY as a model, and so has an ex girlfriend of mine, but being a model for a day doesn't make you a "model". She was nothing but a babysitter. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts