silverfish Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 If that's what you care about then more power to you. I don't need to waste my time and resources to propagate someone else genetic legacy, nor do I want to put up with the inevitable conflicts and issues over kids when they are not even my kids. Nothing personal, but why should I accept that if I don't have to?Chronic disease is not pretty and I feel bad for people who have it, but I don't need to fall in love with someone who is afflicted. Why do that when there are so many healthy people out there?Activists are like toy poodles, sort of fun and cute to watch bounce around but ultimately there's not enough coffee in the world to make them seem worth the effort. Make sure you get all that on your online dating profile to weed out the nutjobs
clv0116 Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 Make sure you get all that on your online dating profile to weed out the nutjobs I don't do online dating much, and I'm not looking ATM.
Khabarak Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 (edited) For me it would probably be: - People who drink excessively (I don't drink at all myself) - People who smoke - People who do drugs (any... even marijuana) - People who are immature - People who posses no financial responsibility - People who are extremely religious, but more its people who try to force religion (any religion) on me. - People who are overweight (For most people, being overweight is due to their mindset. I stay healthy, I would prefer my partner to stay healthy too.) - People who are significantly less intelligent than me. (Sounds horrible, I know, but it just doesn't work out well to be on two completely different levels.). Edited November 20, 2009 by Khabarak
cheergirl Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 Disloyalty... not being able to differentiate between "friends" and others, and choosing the wrong one...
meerkat stew Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 Republicans. ..It makes me very sad to see people say those with bipolar disorder should be automatically excluded. You expect people to give you a chance despite a diagnosed personality disorder, yet nix people based on political party affiliation? That's just amazing. Guess you haven't figured out yet that both political parties are just a different coat of paint on the same crappy car.
Woggle Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 Feminists Excessive drug use but weed is perfectly okay with me Overly religious No sense of accountability Emotionally unstable
meerkat stew Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 Some dealbreakers of mine, no particular order: Political naivete or inflexibility Inconsistent, actions don't match the words that come out of her mouth Personality Disordered Breast implants, use of tanning beds Alcoholic, pot smoking is fine in moderation, much preferable to being with a drunk Liar or heavy rationalizer, won't take accountability, always completely blameless Cheater Vegan Felon Drug addict or too many prescription meds, on SSRIs without a plan to get off them Materialistic Fat Loud Whiny Disrespectful Vain High Maintenance Drama Addict Attention Addict Luxury Addict Dumb Illogical Privileged Spoiled, difference between privileged and spoiled, spoiled means never said no to, privileged sees nothing wrong with having never been said no to Catty Impulsive Spender Infantile or Childish Passive Frigid Yes, it is a unicorn, but we can keep dreaming.
Throne Of Lies Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 Is the above describing a woman or man? For a woman, the big dealbreakers are Kids, and past abortions (I like to get a little damned if you do, damned if you don't thing going on, it excites me) Current drug use Overweight, upper quadrant of normal weight Previous Marriages, engagements STDs, and a history of infidelity. Snip Snap indeed
Recommended Posts