Author dreamergrl Posted August 11, 2009 Author Posted August 11, 2009 If a girl is free with herself and has fun giving herself to other people, that doesn't make her a whore either. Do you guys want someone who enjoys sex or not. Actually it does. Is this how you are? As for you dreamer, I'm glad to hear you are just joking a lot. You seem like a really cool and down to Earth girl, who a guy would be lucky to earn. (I don't mean earn as in just sex, but overall. Relationship, etc) One can enjoy sex witout being a whore. I love sex, but that doesn't mean I'll hop on any Tom, Dick, or Harry.
Jersey Shortie Posted August 11, 2009 Posted August 11, 2009 DSM, I have no reason to answer to you about my sexual actitivites. Of course, I could say "yes" and you can call me a name and show your own insecurity over the matter. Or I can say "no", and you can throw compliments my way and again, still show your own insecurity over the matter. Women like sex. Men want women to like sex. If a woman wants a lot of partners, it doesn't make her a whore. It makes her a woman that likes sex and doesn't care if other men can't deal with it. The main reason men don't like women that have alot of partners has less to do with her and is all about him and his concerns about how me measures up with the competition. How many women have you slept with DSM?
Author dreamergrl Posted August 11, 2009 Author Posted August 11, 2009 How many women have you slept with DSM? When a guy answers this, are you suppose to divide it by three or multiply it by three?
Pyro Posted August 11, 2009 Posted August 11, 2009 When a guy answers this, are you suppose to divide it by three or multiply it by three? depends on the guy. What do you think?
northstar1 Posted August 11, 2009 Posted August 11, 2009 When a guy answers this, are you suppose to divide it by three or multiply it by three? So the story goes, you divide by 3 for men, multiply by 3 for women.
DSM-IV Posted August 11, 2009 Posted August 11, 2009 DSM, I have no reason to answer to you about my sexual actitivites. Of course, I could say "yes" and you can call me a name and show your own insecurity over the matter. Or I can say "no", and you can throw compliments my way and again, still show your own insecurity over the matter. Care to back this up with psychological evidence? I'd love to hear this one... You're biting off more than you can chew, rest assured. If a woman wants a lot of partners, it doesn't make her a whore. It makes her a woman that likes sex and doesn't care if other men can't deal with it. Lol this logic it... um. No. P.S., you don't represent the majority of women. How many women have you slept with DSM? 2, and that's after I dated them for a period of time first to make sure I loved them. Have I had the opportunity to have slept with many women? More than you could count to in the next 60 seconds.
Author dreamergrl Posted August 11, 2009 Author Posted August 11, 2009 depends on the guy. What do you think? I think in this case we need to multiply. So the story goes, you divide by 3 for men, multiply by 3 for women. So are you saying DSM is a virgin 2, and that's after I dated them for a period of time first to make sure I loved them. Have I had the opportunity to have slept with many women? More than you could count to in the next 60 seconds.
Pyro Posted August 11, 2009 Posted August 11, 2009 I think in this case we need to multiply. So are you saying DSM is a virgin I think divide.
Author dreamergrl Posted August 11, 2009 Author Posted August 11, 2009 I think divide. If you divide here, you're getting a negative number. He said 2.
DSM-IV Posted August 11, 2009 Posted August 11, 2009 I don't fall under any stereotype. I am honest. I could've lied and easily gotten away with saying I slept with 15 women if I felt like it. And even if you did that stupid divide rule, I'd still look grand. I don't need to brag about if I slept with women. That is truly the most retarded measurement of success that exists. I'd rather quote I'm on my way to a PhD, or that I model for Calvin Klein, fall season 2009. Or maybe that I have a girl who cares a lot about me, right now. Or maybe I could say I have a great father, or three very close best friends. Suddenly, sex doesn't seem quite as great.
Jersey Shortie Posted August 11, 2009 Posted August 11, 2009 Care to back this up with psychological evidence? I'd love to hear this one... You're biting off more than you can chew, rest assured. Care to disprove it? It's really obvious that men that feel the need to call women names for having many sex partners are really insecure. It would be one thing if YOU just didn't want to be with a woman that had many sex partners. That I understand. But to call women that have been names and not once make mention about what names men should be called for having many sex partners screams insecurity on your part. Lol this logic it... um. No. P.S., you don't represent the majority of women. This has nothing to do with what I said. 2, and that's after I dated them for a period of time first to make sure I loved them. Have I had the opportunity to have slept with many women? More than you could count to in the next 60 seconds. I think that's cool. But I don't call men that have had many partners. Like I said, it's one thing to just not want a partner with many partners. It's another to call women names.
DSM-IV Posted August 11, 2009 Posted August 11, 2009 Care to disprove it? The burden of proof is on you, for it's you who accused me of insecurity. It's really obvious that men that feel the need to call women names for having many sex partners are really insecure. Really? Read my earlier post where I talk about the good things in my life. I'm curious what aspect of life I would be insecure in. to call women that have been names and not once make mention about what names men should be called for having many sex partners screams insecurity on your part.. I don't advocate this behavior in men either. I strongly despise men who do this, equally as much. Women who sleep around are whores, the end. Guys who sleep around are also whores, the end. Both have deep psychological problems, and THEY'RE the insecure ones. That's the irony of your comments towards me. Please research the psychology of people who sleep around. Usually they are suffering from Histrionic Personality Disorder, and 9/10 are deep down VERY insecure and looking for validation. Usually this stems from a lack of a healthy relationship with a parent or guardian.
donnamaybe Posted August 11, 2009 Posted August 11, 2009 It seems to me that men with delusions of grandeur have a hard time scoring.
DSM-IV Posted August 11, 2009 Posted August 11, 2009 It seems to me that men with delusions of grandeur have a hard time scoring. Care to back up what my delusions are? Or should we stick to ad hominem comments like children.
donnamaybe Posted August 11, 2009 Posted August 11, 2009 should we stick to ad hominem comments like children. You mean like this? the easy, slutty types are in the same mental defected league as the people who cut and burn themselves.
Citizen Drawn Posted August 11, 2009 Posted August 11, 2009 Care to back up what my delusions are? Or should we stick to ad hominem comments like children. I'll tell you what they are. You're at that stage of a PhD where you're treating an internet forum like a scientific debate. Don't worry, we've all been at that stage where we haven't put enough publications out to realise that the energy that goes into these arguments are best saved for an audience that values them.
DSM-IV Posted August 11, 2009 Posted August 11, 2009 I'd be happy to back up my claims. You should've specified that's what you were interested in hearing? As earlier stated already, people who partake in promiscuity on the level of what was aforementioned (sleeping around) usually suffer from a personality disorder that derived from childhood, usually from the lack of relationship with a parent or guardian. Evidence points to people who cut themselves, falling under the same psychological demographic, but they also tend to also be suffering from borderline personality disorder as well. Both, though, stem from lack of security and confidence of one self. The easy types tend to sleep around because deep down they're seeking validation. Secure, respectable women understand their self worth.
donnamaybe Posted August 11, 2009 Posted August 11, 2009 I find it positively HYSTERICAL that a thread, begun by a woman discussing judgmental women, has been taken over by an over-the-top judgmental - ahem - man.
Author dreamergrl Posted August 11, 2009 Author Posted August 11, 2009 Yeah, wtf, takin over by men...and it seems a few men are buying the act that the OP is a sweet innocent girl. LOL.... If this doesn't scream judgmental - I'm not sure what does
gopher Posted August 11, 2009 Posted August 11, 2009 Yeah, wtf, takin over by men...and it seems a few men are buying the act that the OP is a sweet innocent girl. LOL.... Wow, that sounds a tad judgemental I don't judge people on LS, some I like, some not so much and some thankfully are on ignore.... Everyone here has an agenda for being here, there is something they are looking for from LS. The OP's is no less valid than yours.
sally4sara Posted August 11, 2009 Posted August 11, 2009 P.S., you don't represent the majority of women. Neither do you, obviously, so while it's totally cool for you to live how you feel is right - you should probably not bother deciding that for others. I won't think one way or the other about your numbers; I have better things to worry about. I don't intend on sleeping with everyone so I never figured putting people in negative categories based on the amount of partner they've had to be a good way to spend my time or effort.
sally4sara Posted August 11, 2009 Posted August 11, 2009 If this doesn't scream judgmental - I'm not sure what does Oh! What did you do now dreamergrl?
DSM-IV Posted August 11, 2009 Posted August 11, 2009 I never figured putting people in negative categories based on the amount of partner they've had to be a good way to spend my time or effort. I don't waste any effort on them either, thus why I understand they are sluts (guys or girls) and not give a damn, and move along.
Author dreamergrl Posted August 11, 2009 Author Posted August 11, 2009 Oh! What did you do now dreamergrl? I started funny threads, and next thing you know someone has their panties in a wad.
sally4sara Posted August 11, 2009 Posted August 11, 2009 I don't waste any effort on them either, thus why I understand they are sluts (guys or girls) and not give a damn, and move along. You care enough to tag them with a title. I guess I did that sort or thing in high school. That was the last time I can remember being so interested in the sex lives of people I wasn't having sex with.
Recommended Posts