BlueEyedGirl Posted April 20, 2009 Posted April 20, 2009 a no-compete clause among friends is understood. Just like you wouldn't chase after your friend's ex ... your loyalty is to your running pack, not to yourself. Otherwise you'd be that girl from the other post who said she'd go after her friend's boyfriend if "they were in love." You mean me!! Wohoo I am famous
loser101 Posted April 20, 2009 Posted April 20, 2009 Flippin' weak. Do you ever question the difference between a crush and a BF? I make sure to tell the claimer that I hate her when I lose out in a clique. Its my own little scorched earth policy. Death to sisterhood. there are plenty of men to go around so why would anyone hit on a friend's interest? plenty of fish in the sea. as for your little scorched earth policy: that makes you sound really insecure. some things are best kept to yourself
MN randomguy Posted April 21, 2009 Posted April 21, 2009 there are plenty of men to go around so why would anyone hit on a friend's interest? plenty of fish in the sea. as for your little scorched earth policy: that makes you sound really insecure. some things are best kept to yourself The real thing going on is that you're selfish and can't stand the fact that someone you like has a preference other than you. I can be friends with women that preferences for guys that I am not. I had a female friend who was admittedly into metro men. I can say, OK, that's not me. You might like this guy, but whatever, I'm going mountain biking. I could take the attitude that she's a bad person. However, she's not. She's just really into clothes. If a clique of women is going to be like that they'll eventually resent me when they don't get what they want and I don't play their game by their rules. So, why delay the inevitable. You need to be comfortable being hated if you're going to be an individual.
MN randomguy Posted April 21, 2009 Posted April 21, 2009 You mean me!! Wohoo I am famous Score B.E.G.!! What's the context, link me.
Recommended Posts