Trialbyfire Posted March 28, 2009 Posted March 28, 2009 But then again, we ARE princesses, so I guess we sorta don't really, like, understand the world, and the universe, and the things in it, ya know? -Isolde la Princesse (where is my Tristan?!?!?!) You need a new avatar, to denote your status in life. The mentality expressed within this thread is foreign to me, in that the minute you have this type of attitude, is the minute you've become the victim. Don't people want to be wanted as a priority for who they are v. someone who amends their requirements to kind of...fit you in as an addendum? It also smacks of princess entitlement to expect that the world owes you a date or relationship. Get out there and generate some interest. Only partially true. Yes, I've discovered the inner princess in me, brought her out in broad daylight, and then beat her into pulp . True story. Hmmm...that's not what I'm seeing. She's still there and thriving!
Woggle Posted March 28, 2009 Posted March 28, 2009 What's wrong with princesses? We're entitled to everything. Don't be jealous, Woggle. Admit it, you secretly want to be a princess. I never expected anything to be handed to me. Just don't try to take it from me after I earn it.
Trialbyfire Posted March 28, 2009 Posted March 28, 2009 I never expected anything to be handed to me. Just don't try to take it from me after I earn it. What makes you believe that princesses like myself don't work for what we have and want?
Woggle Posted March 28, 2009 Posted March 28, 2009 What makes you believe that princesses like myself don't work for what we have and want? If you do you are not a princess. Princess sundrome combined with militant feminism have made it nearly impossible to biuil a good relationship with most women. You have to give her the universe and then some and even if you do she will find something to resent you about. These same women think that just because they are attractive that a man is obligated to put up with their endless drama. This is what I mean when I say that they have nothing to offer but looks. The attractive man they pine for who has everything going for him is looking elsewhere.
Trialbyfire Posted March 28, 2009 Posted March 28, 2009 If you do you are not a princess. Princess sundrome combined with militant feminism have made it nearly impossible to biuil a good relationship with most women. You have to give her the universe and then some and even if you do she will find something to resent you about. These same women think that just because they are attractive that a man is obligated to put up with their endless drama. This is what I mean when I say that they have nothing to offer but looks. The attractive man they pine for who has everything going for him is looking elsewhere. Those are unrealistic absolutes about stereo-types. Every, single person living in the western world, has had something handed to them, whether it was the food put onto their tables or the clothing they wore, as children. Don't tell me that not one single woman has given you anything, that you didn't have to work for. If you state that, I call b/s, with hard facts to support me. It's just your blinders because I've seen many a female LS member try to help you with less than zero thanks from you. If anything, all they've gotten back are hateful posts about women. This sounds to me like a sense of entitlement, that you deserve to be well treated but then, return nothing but bitter hatred. Just stop with the princess victim mentality, Woggle. You, as much as anyone else including me, have control over their lives, our thoughts and how we perceive our interactions with other people.
Alma Mobley Posted March 31, 2009 Posted March 31, 2009 Taking any shot you can get are you? When I was younger I dated a much wider range of aged women, from 16-56 actually. Sex is pretty good into the mid-40s in my experience and certainly OK even older, but I'm presently dating with an aim to starting a family. Pretty sure a 55 year old woman isn't the way to go for that one. I stand by my statement, it's based on personal experience and I never said it applied to ALL women, just a lot of them. Sorry, clv, I was just ribbing you, no offense.
clv0116 Posted March 31, 2009 Posted March 31, 2009 Sorry, clv, I was just ribbing you, no offense. Ah OK. Well nice one there, you got me. In all fairness I've never dated from 32-39 inclusive, just both sides of that.
Alma Mobley Posted March 31, 2009 Posted March 31, 2009 Ah OK. Well nice one there, you got me. In all fairness I've never dated from 32-39 inclusive, just both sides of that. Hehe..really, you never dated a woman in the age range over 30? Amazing.
clv0116 Posted March 31, 2009 Posted March 31, 2009 Hehe..really, you never dated a woman in the age range over 30? Amazing. Ya, in my adult life it's been 18-31 with a few holes (no one 28, for instance) and 40-56.
Alma Mobley Posted March 31, 2009 Posted March 31, 2009 Ya, in my adult life it's been 18-31 with a few holes (no one 28, for instance) and 40-56. Holes? Okay, I won't touch that one...resisting comment... CLV, you have to know you are easy to pick on, eh? You demand physical perfection in your women -- and date very young and care not a whit about intellect blah blah. That's your choice, but it does make you a target. You know that, I am sure... I have absolutely no interest in talking about the relative allure of 18-25 year olds!... I like them young too, as you know!
clv0116 Posted March 31, 2009 Posted March 31, 2009 You demand physical perfection in your women -- and date very young and care not a whit about intellect.... Just because I prefer young and pretty, it does not follow they are stupid. Also, you can pick at me all day sweetie.
Alma Mobley Posted March 31, 2009 Posted March 31, 2009 Just because I prefer young and pretty, it does not follow they are stupid. Also, you can pick at me all day sweetie. Aww -- you called me sweetie. I am flattered. I never said they were stupid. Immature, yes, I may have said that, but never stupid.
clv0116 Posted March 31, 2009 Posted March 31, 2009 Aww -- you called me sweetie. I am flattered. I never said they were stupid. Immature, yes, I may have said that, but never stupid. Not a whit about intellect sounded like a nice way to say stupid.
Alma Mobley Posted March 31, 2009 Posted March 31, 2009 Not a whit about intellect sounded like a nice way to say stupid. I meant that you don't care -- or do you? I have to go. Will see you next time on a thread, I suppose, on a thread such as this.
clv0116 Posted March 31, 2009 Posted March 31, 2009 I meant that you don't care -- or do you? She doesn't need to be an expert on Quantum Electrodynamics or anything but of course it matters. We have to be able to have good meaningful conversations and appreciate similar things.
Alma Mobley Posted April 3, 2009 Posted April 3, 2009 Oh...well I do expect a cursory knowledge of quantum mechanics in the men I date -- nothing in depth. One of my quirks, I guess. (Oh, "kinda" joking, I am serious about knowledge of the sciences.)
clv0116 Posted April 3, 2009 Posted April 3, 2009 Oh...well I do expect a cursory knowledge of quantum mechanics in the men I date -- nothing in depth. One of my quirks, I guess. (Oh, "kinda" joking, I am serious about knowledge of the sciences.) It would be a plus, true.
Recommended Posts