samsungxoxo Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 I don't think I have ever dated a woman who was below 5'7". It's not a requirement, but petite and/or skinny is just not my type. Kool so I'm just save by the bell I guess, LOL 5''7'' here.
wuggle Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 Ha...here's one honest guy, stating the sole reason for his attraction... Not so, her stunning good lucks, intelligence, high Moral values, sense of humour and the fact she doesn't like pink are the main reasons for the attraction..(the arse thing is just an added bonus) .
Trialbyfire Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 Not so, her stunning good lucks, intelligence, high Moral values, sense of humour and the fact she doesn't like pink are the main reasons for the attraction..(the arse thing is just an added bonus) . Nice recovery! No wonder you're still married!
anne1707 Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 Nice recovery! No wonder you're still married! Only just!
clv0116 Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 So you like skin and bone then? Well skin and bone are required ingredients. They all look(ed) pretty healthy to me, but I don't date fat chicks if that's what you're getting at.
anne1707 Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 Well skin and bone are required ingredients. They all look(ed) pretty healthy to me, but I don't date fat chicks if that's what you're getting at. Those aren't fat "chicks", they are underweight. That's a BMI of 16.3 when a healthy BMI is 18.5 to 25.
wuggle Posted February 5, 2009 Posted February 5, 2009 I always hated dating chickens as well, all those feathers, the strange clucks and the fact that you're expected to eat your date when you've finished, best sticking to humans
Stockalone Posted February 5, 2009 Posted February 5, 2009 Kool so I'm just save by the bell I guess, LOL 5''7'' here. LOL. There was a similar thread about this some time ago which got me thinking and in retrospect, I noticed that I never dated a woman who was shorter than that. I never had thought about it while I was dating. I do have a preference for taller women, but there are many attractive shorter women and I did ask out some of them. But none of them said yes. So, it's not entirely my fault.
Mary3 Posted February 5, 2009 Posted February 5, 2009 Height doesn't matter. Weight is more important. Soo............355 lbs and whiskers is out of the question ?
Mary3 Posted February 5, 2009 Posted February 5, 2009 I always hated dating chickens as well, all those feathers, the strange clucks and the fact that you're expected to eat your date when you've finished, best sticking to humans LOL ! Extra Crispy or Mild ?
Mary3 Posted February 5, 2009 Posted February 5, 2009 as i like my women to wear 4" heels they should be around 5'2" to 5'8" so they don't top my 6' frame i generally don't have any problem in that area Alpha you are so HOT
clv0116 Posted February 5, 2009 Posted February 5, 2009 Those aren't fat "chicks", they are underweight. That's a BMI of 16.3 when a healthy BMI is 18.5 to 25. They're not fat, and they're not underweight. They are very healthy, cute little fat rolls and everything. I just ran the girls I'm dating now through the BMI calculator and it said 17, 17, 17.2. Couple that with the fact that BMI is complete bullcrap (weight increases with volume, the factor in BMI computations is squared when it should be cubed) for people that deviate from average stature and .... I think they are as I said, healthy. For instance, BMI says a 6' 8 man who weighs 230 is overweight. Conversely a 4' 10 woman who weighs under 120 is not considered fat. Hello?
tanbark813 Posted February 5, 2009 Posted February 5, 2009 Soo............355 lbs and whiskers is out of the question ? Yes, unless we're talking about a lion that has been trained to not eat me.
anne1707 Posted February 5, 2009 Posted February 5, 2009 They're not fat, and they're not underweight. They are very healthy, cute little fat rolls and everything. I just ran the girls I'm dating now through the BMI calculator and it said 17, 17, 17.2. Couple that with the fact that BMI is complete bullcrap (weight increases with volume, the factor in BMI computations is squared when it should be cubed) for people that deviate from average stature and .... I think they are as I said, healthy. For instance, BMI says a 6' 8 man who weighs 230 is overweight. Conversely a 4' 10 woman who weighs under 120 is not considered fat. Hello? On your link for 5' 6" at 100lbs, I calculated a BMI of 16.1 which is classed as underweight. So you are now either dating shorter women or heavier women than your post where you said: the only ones over 100 pounds were 5'6 and 5' 8. They all look(ed) pretty healthy to me,
Isolde Posted February 5, 2009 Posted February 5, 2009 5'6 and 100 Ibs is really, really thin. I'm a 5'4 and just shy of 100--I'm actually trying to put on weight! I have almost no spare fat so I don't see how someone 5'6 and 100 would. Nothing wrong if you are naturally that thin, but I've seen 5'6 130 people that looked really good, so that's just so skinny.
Trialbyfire Posted February 5, 2009 Posted February 5, 2009 Does it really matter if clv has dating criteria that we don't fit into? He's got the right to be attracted to whomever he wants to be attracted to, just like we do. Some women are naturally very, very tiny framed. There are quite a few asian women around my city who look like they'd be blown over by a breeze. Vive la différence!
clv0116 Posted February 5, 2009 Posted February 5, 2009 .... the only ones over 100 pounds were 5'6 and 5' 8. On your link for 5' 6" at 100lbs, I calculated a BMI of 16.1 which is classed as underweight. So you are now either dating shorter women or heavier women than your post where you said: Look up the word over in a dictionary and get back to me on that OK? Currently: 5' 0 @ 87 5' 1 @ 90 5' 4 @ 100 The biggest were: 5' 6 @ 125 5' 8 @ 145 That last one was a damn viking but she sure had nice jugs.
Isolde Posted February 5, 2009 Posted February 5, 2009 Does it really matter if clv has dating criteria that we don't fit into? He's got the right to be attracted to whomever he wants to be attracted to, just like we do. Some women are naturally very, very tiny framed. There are quite a few asian women around my city who look like they'd be blown over by a breeze. Vive la différence! To clarify, I was just surprised that he found these ladies pleasantly plump. I used to be 5'4 and 95, so I'm the last person to say you can't be thin and healthy.
clv0116 Posted February 5, 2009 Posted February 5, 2009 I used to be 5'4 and 95, so I'm the last person to say you can't be thin and healthy. That's pretty small but if your frame is small I bet you're cute as a button. Are you a vegetarian or something?
Isolde Posted February 5, 2009 Posted February 5, 2009 That's pretty small but if your frame is small I bet you're cute as a button. Are you a vegetarian or something? I'm not any thinner than the girls you mentioned, why do you consider it small? I weigh more like 98 now and trying to get up to 103 or so. I don't eat a lot of meat, no.
You'reasian Posted February 5, 2009 Posted February 5, 2009 I weigh more like 98 now and trying to get up to 103 or so. I don't eat a lot of meat, no. Do you eat a large, healthy breakfast every morning?
clv0116 Posted February 5, 2009 Posted February 5, 2009 I'm not any thinner than the girls you mentioned, why do you consider it small? I weigh more like 98 now and trying to get up to 103 or so. I don't eat a lot of meat, no. Well 5' 4 and 100 *is* small, it's just not freakishly underweight or unhealthy. For the record I do like small but I'm not into bones like the guys that date women with out of control eating disorders. The girl I'm dating who is 5' 4 is very small framed, tiny waist, slim hips, small wrists, ankles, knees, etc. and she is right about your weight and height.
Isolde Posted February 5, 2009 Posted February 5, 2009 Do you eat a large' date=' healthy breakfast every morning?[/quote'] I go to grad school, so no. I try! My appetite is pretty good though--I can eat an entire Chipotle in one sitting. I know, not very dainty
socialight Posted February 5, 2009 Posted February 5, 2009 to answer the OP, my preference would be my height or shorter. I think 90% of guys don't really care as long as they are the same height or taller than the woman.
Recommended Posts