Bells Posted September 15, 2008 Posted September 15, 2008 We hear it all the time....if we see a hot babe with an old man or a repulsive looking (physically man) and that they have money , that she's only wiht him for the money. I remember one of the Girls from "Girls next door" says she jumps his bones all the time and son. A woman that's younger than me. My question is....how is a woman able to not be physically ill or repulsed while having sex with him....if he has money. I guess being a man is different but even if she had money, I couldn't stomach having sex with an 85 year old woman. Or a 500 lb woman. It's either 1. It's like a light switch, she turns it off mentally 2. There are some women that do NOT care about looks, if the man has money. 3. Looking at number 2, that means a physically UN-attractive man without money can still be physically appealing to a woman no matter how he looks? That means that woman CAN stomach having sex with a man WITH or WITHOUT money...becauset there's ONE constant...he's still repulsive looking. ?? Just some theories I'm throwin out there.
D-Jam Posted September 15, 2008 Posted September 15, 2008 There are some women who honestly don't care about looks. We want to think that's a myth, but some of them exist. I think with the actual golddiggers who hook up with ugly old man who has loads of money, but she's also into looks...they more see this as a "job" or a "trade". Maybe they have to have sex with someone fat, old, and/or wrinkly...but they think about how much shopping they will do at Dior, or the A-List events they get to go to. Frankly, it takes two to tango. I can't imagine the old wealthy guy being naive to think it's love and not golddiging...so I'm sure he would see it as he's paying for a very expensive prostitute. I don't knock golddiggers. It's their choice in life, but they should realize they have a short shelf life.
JoeNewbie Posted September 15, 2008 Posted September 15, 2008 I agree it takes two to tango and sometimes the arrangement is quite obvious. HOWEVER, the majority of the population is ugly but yet people still fall in love and have kids. I don't think it is our prerogative to judge whether two people should be together or not. If beauty was the only criteria then there would be a lot of unhappy people around us. And while some people won't acknowledge this, a wealthy person oftentimes (not always but often) is successful for a reason: they are smart, educated, charismatic, etc. They are successful in their career for the same reasons why they are successful in their love life.
dcgirl33 Posted September 15, 2008 Posted September 15, 2008 Sometimes, once you get to know someone, they beccome very appealing to you. There is a guy in my office that on "face value" is not that hot, but when I would talk to him, he would hold the stare just a little too long. All of a sudden, he became very sexy to me. It turned out that he would keeping looking into my eyes after I finished talking because he was kind of slow and everything was catching up in his head.
Trialbyfire Posted September 15, 2008 Posted September 15, 2008 It's no different than the man who "does" hookers and worse yet, he pays her for her services! Most hookers are so not attractive with that much used look. It just goes to prove that attractiveness is subjective. Also, as far as I'm concerned, a gold digger is the same as a hooker. Cash or gifts for services rendered.
Author Bells Posted September 15, 2008 Author Posted September 15, 2008 It's no different than the man who "does" hookers and worse yet, he pays her for her services! Most hookers are so not attractive with that much used look. It just goes to prove that attractiveness is subjective. Also, as far as I'm concerned, a gold digger is the same as a hooker. Cash or gifts for services rendered. Yeah, I knew of someone sister, that was single, late 20's that just used wealthy men for their money...one was a married man....and she preferred to live her life boyfriend free...just live off the money of men entirely (with no love) So basically, it's more of a "barter" system with them, than just exchange of cash.
vonerik012 Posted September 15, 2008 Posted September 15, 2008 Men do not pay hookers for sex, or because they are attractive. They pay them to leave. Everyone has a different definition of what is a gold digger. Women who first pre-qualify the men they date according to income/status/earning potential, and THEN try to find chemistry are gold diggers in my book. I NEVER cared if a girl was dirt poor, wealthy, or had a high paying job. It is completely irrelevant as I do not have a grand plan to better my life with someone else's money.
paddington bear Posted September 15, 2008 Posted September 15, 2008 My question is....how is a woman able to not be physically ill or repulsed while having sex with him....if he has money. I guess being a man is different but even if she had money, I couldn't stomach having sex with an 85 year old woman. Or a 500 lb woman. It's either 1. It's like a light switch, she turns it off mentally 2. There are some women that do NOT care about looks, if the man has money. 3. Looking at number 2, that means a physically UN-attractive man without money can still be physically appealing to a woman no matter how he looks? That means that woman CAN stomach having sex with a man WITH or WITHOUT money...becauset there's ONE constant...he's still repulsive looking I think they do turn off mentally, and as D-Jam said, to the real gold-diggers, it's like a job. On their to-do list: Must give dying 80 year old husband his viagra and then a blowjob and then I'll get to delve into our mutual account and buy myself that diamond necklace I've had my eye on. I think that the human species has evolved in a certain way, women looking for providers in some sense. For me that means he can't be some stoner sitting at home talking about writing that novel some day, for others this provider thing gets twisted to an extreme and hence you have gold-diggers. And yes of course women can stomach having sex with repulsive men. How do you think prostitutes do it? And what man hasn't woken up with a massive hangover beside some girl he finds repulsive, but had sex with the night before because he was drunk and horny and she was the only one available?
Lizzie60 Posted September 15, 2008 Posted September 15, 2008 Money is sexy!!!! There are a lot of 'ugly' rich men who have all the hot chicks in the world... why? I think money gives power and power is somehow sexy and 'attractive'... so I guess unless the guy looks like a monkey.. attractiveness is subjective.. I think of Pierre Péladeau (dead now) head of Quebecor.. he was really ugly.. but had the most beautiful women (he was married 3 times I think)... I can see where a very smart, not so good looking man who would attract a lot of women.. intelligence is also verrrry sexy.. (and most rich men are smart!) We love money.. what can I say!
Tomcat33 Posted September 15, 2008 Posted September 15, 2008 First of all a lot of these guys are neither 500lbs OR 85 yrs old so let's get a grip shall we? For the most part with the exception of say Anna Nicole Smith, the types of men with money that are "repulsive" are just guys that had they no money they would be consdered average looking at best. Having said that, I would like to know how men who will feck anything that moves (according to your own admissions) CAN feck anything that moves, how can they feck women that are overweight and nasty looking? Well the answer is simple: the need to get laid FAR supercedes the need to get picky about what the lay is going to look like. Well it's the same mentality that these gold digger types have, their need to be kept and live the high life doing nothing in return supercededs their need to be selective in picking a man that is moderately attractive looking. I don't get it it either, since attraction is big for me, but I couldn't be an average looking guy either since I would prob die virgin if my only options for sex were to do it with someone I was not attracted to. It's such a relief to be a woman!!
Recommended Posts