Lovely Disaster Posted July 26, 2008 Posted July 26, 2008 She lied about how much debt she had. Nope, it turns out that he lied - he just made that up that she had a lot of debt. He never intended to marry her and had her move down there with him to marry him, even though he never intended to do so. $30,000 and a few trips? Big deal. In the end, that $30,000 really isn't that much, it doesn't even make up for one year of salary she lost by moving. I think it is a fair deal. It will cost her a lot if she wants to move back and to find a job paying similar, plus the emotional damages he did by deceiving her with a fake proposal. The court heard the whole story and felt that way.
BUENG1 Posted July 26, 2008 Posted July 26, 2008 Nope, it turns out that he lied - he just made that up that she had a lot of debt. He never intended to marry her and had her move down there with him to marry him, even though he never intended to do so. $30,000 and a few trips? Big deal. In the end, that $30,000 really isn't that much, it doesn't even make up for one year of salary she lost by moving. I think it is a fair deal. It will cost her a lot if she wants to move back and to find a job paying similar, plus the emotional damages he did by deceiving her with a fake proposal. The court heard the whole story and felt that way. Who says he lied?
woods321 Posted July 26, 2008 Posted July 26, 2008 You can be in a LDR and then get married. She did not HAVE to move. Who knows what types of problems she had at her job. Maybe she was about to quit or get laid off anyway. Millions of scenarios. 2 carat diamond, 30k, and trips. What else does she want? How much did she spend on him?
Lovely Disaster Posted July 26, 2008 Posted July 26, 2008 You can be in a LDR and then get married. She did not HAVE to move. Who knows what types of problems she had at her job. Maybe she was about to quit or get laid off anyway. Millions of scenarios. 2 carat diamond, 30k, and trips. What else does she want? How much did she spend on him? She clearly moved because he had promised her to marry her, int he process leaving a much higher paying job, he obviously had her move in with him so then they get married (at least that is what he outright deceived her into logically thinking). He obviously makes significantly more and she was the one who was put out financially, he wasn't. How do you know how much he paid for the diamond? could've been a cheapie. trips? That's a gift sort of thing, like for a birthday and whatever, same with the ring, if he gave her an engagement ring, that is a gift. Meanwhile he kept his same job and isn't out anything financially while she is left in the cold with a $30,000 a year job. That is basically poverty level while he gets to continue living the high life. The $30,000 really isn't a big deal because that is a gift, also, and it doesn't even cover a half of the salary for one year that she was out. She was out a LOT, he wasn't out squat.
woods321 Posted July 26, 2008 Posted July 26, 2008 It is all BS. She didn't have to move to get married. Why didn't she wait until they are married to move? or why didnt she find a man to marry closer by if her job was so wonderful. Yes, I am sure he makes more money. Thats why this money grubbing whore wanted to marry him. And all you women are ridiculous. "Oh he only paid 30k of her debt.".. "oh it was probably a cheap ring" "oh, so what he took her on vacations" Why don't you go blow 50-70k on a man, then lets hear you talk.. Entitlement attitude. its her problem for leaving her job. Nobody made her do it.
I Luv the Chariot OH Posted July 26, 2008 Posted July 26, 2008 Meanwhile he kept his same job and isn't out anything financially while she is left in the cold with a $30,000 a year job. That is basically poverty level Holy cow, are you serious??? I think somebody needs to step out of their sheltered bourgeoisie lifestyle! People living in ACTUAL poverty would kill for 30k a year. There's no need to exaggerate to such an ignorant extreme--we all get your point, you think she did a great thing, good for her. Not everyone agrees.
woods321 Posted July 26, 2008 Posted July 26, 2008 The woman is a manipulative monster. She suckered him into paying off HER DEBT. He took her on vacations. He bought her a 2 carat diamond ring. Ladies, do you think it is mens obligation to pay off your debt. if she was making 80k why was she in debt? What happened is she now thought she was on the road to the easy life. A man to pay all her bills while she spends, for the rest of her life. Even if he pays 150k, (which i am sure he will appeal), that is much cheaper than having this creature around. She is probably upset she couldn't marry him, divorce him, and then take all of his money.
MaxManwell Posted July 26, 2008 Posted July 26, 2008 It is all BS. She didn't have to move to get married. Why didn't she wait until they are married to move? or why didnt she find a man to marry closer by if her job was so wonderful. Yes, I am sure he makes more money. Thats why this money grubbing whore wanted to marry him. And all you women are ridiculous. "Oh he only paid 30k of her debt.".. "oh it was probably a cheap ring" "oh, so what he took her on vacations" Why don't you go blow 50-70k on a man, then lets hear you talk.. Entitlement attitude. its her problem for leaving her job. Nobody made her do it. I don't understand how anyone could defend her position. A man does not have to spend money on you. Just because you get involved with a man does not mean you have to gain financially. So if a woman divorces a man, can he sue he for all the money he spent keeping her, and the kids, because after the divorce they basically become her kids and she did break a contract ?
woods321 Posted July 26, 2008 Posted July 26, 2008 Exactly... So lets say she decided not to marry him. Can he get his 30k back? his money for the vacations? Oh, the feminists feel those are "gifts". But she can't take responsibility for her own actions, because NOW she is portrayed as a weak submissive female who was mislead by this mean horrible man! Its funny how they get to play both sides depending on what suits them best.
I Luv the Chariot OH Posted July 26, 2008 Posted July 26, 2008 Oh, the feminists feel those are "gifts". This woman is the opposite of a feminist; she's just a greedy *****. Now YOU're starting to sound bitter
woods321 Posted July 26, 2008 Posted July 26, 2008 Feminists tend to blame men for everything. That was my point. Even if she left her own job to move, it is still the mans fault. I am sure she was all for "equality" up until it came to her being dumped. Then she is the weak submissive woman who was mislead by the evil man.
havoc Posted July 26, 2008 Posted July 26, 2008 Has anyone here read the actual case? I haven't -- based on the limited information on that link. If a jury awarded some money, I'm thinking there is more to this story. My first thought was that she had paid a lot of money for the wedding and he backed out at the last minute, and got stuck with the bill or something. Why are feminists blamed for freaking EVERYTHING? This seems to be a recurring theme.
Art_Critic Posted July 26, 2008 Posted July 26, 2008 She sued for breach of contract.. She won... http://www.gainesvilletimes.com/news/article/7296/ She won for the simple reason that he caused her huge financial distress.. If you look at where the jury figured the amount they gave her one years salary plus benefits and cost of living increase. I personally don't think she should have sued but she did.. and she proved her point...
Ariadne Posted July 26, 2008 Posted July 26, 2008 http://www.wsbtv.com/news/16966088/detail.html Yikes!! Here is another example of how petty, entitled, and self-serving many people are. She probably was all lovey-dovey with him, he paid all that debt of hers, and then she turned right back at him with with a stab in the back.
Lookingforward Posted July 26, 2008 Posted July 26, 2008 They awarded her one year of her old salary plus interest etc - hardly a JACKPOT lol
woods321 Posted July 26, 2008 Posted July 26, 2008 LOL.. You think this woman opened her pocket book to spend a dime on the wedding? Not a chance. Ok here is the story... Both of them lived in Gainesville GA. They dated, and broke up in 2005. She moved to FL and got a new job. In OCT of 2006, he bought her a 2 carat diamond ring, and she moved back to her hometown in GA to date him. The wedding date was set for DEC 06. This is when he left the note asking to postpone the wedding. They still lived together for 3 more months, AND THEN they broke up. 3 months after the break up she decided to sue. So, she lost about 5 months of her time. 3 of which were after the "note" her left her.
havoc Posted July 26, 2008 Posted July 26, 2008 Sounds like the law was to her advantage, then, in Podunk. That kind of crap would never fly in Cali or NY. You men should be complaining about women in the midwest (supposedly not feminist) than more liberal areas. The "traditional" ones will screw you the hardest!
Ariadne Posted July 26, 2008 Posted July 26, 2008 Well, I guess good thing that he got rid of her on time. Imagine! To be married to that character...
Lookingforward Posted July 26, 2008 Posted July 26, 2008 Sure are a lot of bitter men posting on this one........ At the very least it may make some scumbags out there think twice before promising something they don't intened to deliver.......
BUENG1 Posted July 26, 2008 Posted July 26, 2008 She sued for breach of contract.. She won... http://www.gainesvilletimes.com/news/article/7296/ She won for the simple reason that he caused her huge financial distress.. If you look at where the jury figured the amount they gave her one years salary plus benefits and cost of living increase. I personally don't think she should have sued but she did.. and she proved her point... She earned 81,000 a year and now earns 30. How does 150,000 add up to one years salary?
Ariadne Posted July 26, 2008 Posted July 26, 2008 Sure are a lot of bitter men posting on this one........ At the very least it may make some scumbags out there think twice before promising something they don't intened to deliver....... Hmm... no. Maybe he thought that she was an honest, sweet person. And living with her he realized that she was a piece of sht. That's why he broke up.
havoc Posted July 26, 2008 Posted July 26, 2008 Wow I am amazed at how much venom and assumption Woods can do before I can even post! Congrats, Woods! I am bored now with this story -- I am sorry this one issue in Podunk got so much play and tarnished every woman, ever living. I need to be a man, I guess.
Woggle Posted July 26, 2008 Posted July 26, 2008 How is he a scumbag for changing his mind? Chances are she would have been a walkaway wife a few years from now anyway so what is she so mad about?
Art_Critic Posted July 26, 2008 Posted July 26, 2008 Hmm... no. Maybe he thought that she was an honest, sweet person. And living with her he realized that she was a piece of sht. That's why he broke up. Says the woman who thinks women should marry rich and for money..
woods321 Posted July 26, 2008 Posted July 26, 2008 Sure are a lot of bitter men posting on this one........ At the very least it may make some scumbags out there think twice before promising something they don't intened to deliver....... LOL.. Who sounds bitter? Yes he was SUCH a scumbag. He paid her debt and took her on vacations. All she did is open her legs.. After living with this creature, he rightfully changed his mind and realized she was just using him for money. So he changed his mind.
Recommended Posts