Brady_to_Moss Posted July 16, 2008 Posted July 16, 2008 What do you guys or girls see when say you see 100 people in that range...how many are good looking to you?
Mahatma Posted July 16, 2008 Posted July 16, 2008 What do you guys or girls see when say you see 100 people in that range...how many are good looking to you? 30% I would never be attracted to. 50% I would be willing to date. 20% I pursue to date.
Jake Barnes Posted July 16, 2008 Posted July 16, 2008 Id say maybe 75% of women in that age range are at least what Id call attractive...they have the sexiness of youth going for them
Arise_Serpentor Posted July 16, 2008 Posted July 16, 2008 i like to know a person before im attracted to them! kind of shallow to decide on age alone, dont you think? I mean, i can understand not wanting old crows, but geez! so many other ages are fine!
Touche Posted July 16, 2008 Posted July 16, 2008 Then call me shallow. I don't find men in their 20's sexy at all. I didn't really even when I was in my 20's. We're all entitled to our preferences. I guess we're all shallow to a degree then.
Arise_Serpentor Posted July 17, 2008 Posted July 17, 2008 Then call me shallow. I don't find men in their 20's sexy at all. I didn't really even when I was in my 20's. We're all entitled to our preferences. I guess we're all shallow to a degree then. So you decide your attraction on age alone?!?! That's what I was saying! Somehow i don't think you read what I wrote!
Touche Posted July 17, 2008 Posted July 17, 2008 So you decide your attraction on age alone?!?! That's what I was saying! Somehow i don't think you read what I wrote! I read what you wrote. I find nothing sexy about boys in their 20's. It's like Other I just said. It would be like dating a baby. And no, of course I don't decide my attraction on age alone. (Well I'm married now but when I was dating.) You say you wouldn't even date "old crows." How old is an "old crow" to you? I'd probably prefer the old crows to the babies myself. So you must also partly decide your attraction level on age too. I mean why wouldn't you get to know, say a 60 year old? Just because of their age? How shallow of you! See where I'm going with this? That's the same as my not being attracted to 20 somethings. Same exact thing.
My_Other_I Posted July 17, 2008 Posted July 17, 2008 Honestly, it's all about maturity level to me and I have not met ANY mature 23-year olds. I'm almost 30 and anyone under 30 looks 15 to me. I guess Mother Nature's way to stop us from certain things...
Citizen Erased Posted July 17, 2008 Posted July 17, 2008 I read what you wrote. I find nothing sexy about boys in their 20's. It's like Other I just said. It would be like dating a baby. And no, of course I don't decide my attraction on age alone. (Well I'm married now but when I was dating.) You say you wouldn't even date "old crows." How old is an "old crow" to you? I'd probably prefer the old crows to the babies myself. So you must also partly decide your attraction level on age too. I mean why wouldn't you get to know, say a 60 year old? Just because of their age? How shallow of you! See where I'm going with this? That's the same as my not being attracted to 20 somethings. Same exact thing. Except that with you the age difference would be what? 20 or so years? The other example it would be 40...I can see where you are getting with your point, I just don't think it is the exact same thing. Close but not exact... Besides from my boyfriend and a select few others, I find maybe 30% of that age range physically attractive. Those tend to be the ones that don't look their age. Intellectually the number is probably at about a zero.
Touche Posted July 17, 2008 Posted July 17, 2008 Except that with you the age difference would be what? 20 or so years? The other example it would be 40...I can see where you are getting with your point, I just don't think it is the exact same thing. Close but not exact... Besides from my boyfriend and a select few others, I find maybe 30% of that age range physically attractive. Those tend to be the ones that don't look their age. Intellectually the number is probably at about a zero. No, the point wasn't about age difference but about the fact that yes, we ALL exlude certain age ranges and it doesn't make us shallow. I mean I don't know how old Arise is. But let's assume he/she is in his/her twenties. Then I guess I can say he/she would probably not be interested in a 45 year old let's say. The age doesn't matter. I was just trying to make a point that pretty much all of us exclude people of a certain age group. I was called "shallow" for saying that.
D-Lish Posted July 17, 2008 Posted July 17, 2008 In the 20-23 age range... I think lots of those male specimens are pretty attractive- and I am in my 30's. When I was that age.. I didn't find too many guys I felt were attractive.
Trialbyfire Posted July 17, 2008 Posted July 17, 2008 Aesthetically attractive = +/-10%. Attracted to = 0%
LoveDeluxe78 Posted July 17, 2008 Posted July 17, 2008 In the 20-23 age range... I think lots of those male specimens are pretty attractive- and I am in my 30's. When I was that age.. I didn't find too many guys I felt were attractive. I find the guys in the 19-23 age group super sexy! They are always the ones approaching me too so it's tempting and hard to say no! I'm 29. When I was in that age group, around 18, I was dating guys in their mid 20's. I think I was just super mature for my age back then and felt like I had to act more mature so I attracted older guys and now that I'm just my silly self, it's the younger guys.
stoopid_guy Posted July 17, 2008 Posted July 17, 2008 How do you define "attractive?" Nice to look at? at least 50% Wanna do more than look? 2% (maybe.) At that age, they're still kids but too inexperienced to realize it. Even when I was that age, most of the ladies I dated more than once were late 20's or 30's. One was even mid-40's.
Recommended Posts