awesomeness43 Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 whats the average number for an attractive uc educated girl at the age of 19?
Jake Barnes Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 Where in the world are you talking about? In Iran its probably one, in the United Kingdom a handful, in California its something like 263
Author awesomeness43 Posted July 13, 2008 Author Posted July 13, 2008 california. so cal area. I guess i kind of know that her number isnt too bad as mines is higher but the fact that shes perhaps the first girl i really cared about and see potential in i am a bit bothered? Thanks.
Nemo Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 In Iran its probably one, in the United Kingdom a handful, in California its something like 263 Assuming she lost her virginity late - like 16 - I think this number is a little on the low side. It's only about one new dude every three weeks. I know I don't study that much.
Jake Barnes Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 Whats her number Im disconnected to you youngsters but in 1995 I would have said 1-2, so Ill say maybe 3-4 might be average?
Nemo Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 If you were drunk, and you can't remember their name(s), does it count?
xpaperxcutx Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 If you were drunk, and you can't remember their name(s), does it count? On average 2-3 but if she's a party girl, and in So Cal, then 4-5 with lots of making out.
Citizen Erased Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 I'm 20 and it is 3...some of my friends it has been less, some more (some ALOT more lol). It really depends on the person and I guess the people she hangs out with, if she has been in a relationship etc.
Nemo Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 I'm 20 and it is 3...some I don't think you have to mention threesomes separately. Just add two instead of one, or something. Anyway, 20 seems pretty low, but I guess you got lucky and found a great guy before having to "kiss" very many frogs. Good for you!
Citizen Erased Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 I don't think you have to mention threesomes separately. Just add two instead of one, or something. Anyway, 20 seems pretty low, but I guess you got lucky and found a great guy before having to "kiss" very many frogs. Good for you! :laugh:
JP77 Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 In the UK girls around 19 usually have a child and usually have had sexual partners since they were 13. I wouldn't like to guess how many sexual partners these me..women have had.
Citizen Erased Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 In the UK girls around 19 usually have a child and usually have had sexual partners since they were 13. I wouldn't like to guess how many sexual partners these me..women have had. Wow, guess I'm lucky my parents moved me to Australia then!
JP77 Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 You are fortunate, but we must realise that not all women aged 19 in the UK have a child, I was merely poking fun at the fact the UK has the highest amount of teenage pregnancies in Western Europe.
Nemo Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 In the UK girls around 19 usually have a child and usually have had sexual partners since they were 13. I wouldn't like to guess how many sexual partners these me..women have had. Actually, 19 is a very healthy age to be having children. I think it's more a reflection of Britain's commitment to public service. The British are much less self-centred. They're much less likely to use such family-delaying excuses such as "getting to know oneself," "travel and see the world," and "having more time and money to do the things I enjoy." They also play the field much earlier, because the British are an efficient people. It's no surprise to me that the US dollar is consistently depreciating against the Pound.
JP77 Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 Actually, 19 is a very healthy age to be having children. I think it's more a reflection of Britain's commitment to public service. The British are much less self-centred. They're much less likely to use such family-delaying excuses such as "getting to know oneself," "travel and see the world," and "having more time and money to do the things I enjoy." They also play the field much earlier, because the British are an efficient people. It's no surprise to me that the US dollar is consistently depreciating against the Pound. Complete nonsense and it shows how much you know about the British. It's probably a joke, no doubt.
Nemo Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 Complete nonsense and it shows how much you know about the British. Sorry, but that's offensive. If you're British, then you must be jealous of the other 19 year olds that have been getting all your action. Either that, or you're as fertile as the moon.
Balthazar Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 Sorry, but that's offensive. If you're British, then you must be jealous of the other 19 year olds that have been getting all your action. Either that, or you're as fertile as the moon. Do BJ's count as a sexual encounter*? * - You must have seen CLERKS to appreciate this comment
JP77 Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 Sorry, but that's offensive. If you're British, then you must be jealous of the other 19 year olds that have been getting all your action. Either that, or you're as fertile as the moon. Why would I want to have children at my young age? I want to travel, explore and do things with my life, no I am not jealous of 19 year old women with a child, living off of state benefits who spend their entire day cleaning up after a small child. The reason so many British teenagers are having children is down to a lack of maturity, a lack of sense and lack of education. They feel some how sex changes them from a child to an adult, but it doesn't. It just proves how stupid some of these morons really are. They can't string two sentences together, can't get a job, live in a slum and raise a child, what kind of life is that for a child to grow up in? 30 is old enough for children, when the person is emotionally stable and financially stable, you can't have that security aged 19, whether you choose to admit this fact, is down to you. Britain is a slum, spend a day here and you'd be ready to emigrate.
Nemo Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 Britain is a slum, spend a day here and you'd be ready to emigrate. Isn't that statement kind of contradictory? Unless slum means strawberry lover's ultimate motherland, or something like that.
xpaperxcutx Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 Why would I want to have children at my young age? I want to travel, explore and do things with my life, no I am not jealous of 19 year old women with a child, living off of state benefits who spend their entire day cleaning up after a small child. The reason so many British teenagers are having children is down to a lack of maturity, a lack of sense and lack of education. They feel some how sex changes them from a child to an adult, but it doesn't. It just proves how stupid some of these morons really are. They can't string two sentences together, can't get a job, live in a slum and raise a child, what kind of life is that for a child to grow up in? 30 is old enough for children, when the person is emotionally stable and financially stable, you can't have that security aged 19, whether you choose to admit this fact, is down to you. Britain is a slum, spend a day here and you'd be ready to emigrate. Well that's your general opinion. But not all british 19 yr olds are like that? Sort of like where I live, my state does have a high pregnancy rate for teenagers, but the statistics usually comes from one specific area of that state. And mostly a lot of different things play into the role of why ppl get pregnant. Like race, culture.. etc
Nemo Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 Do BJ's count as a sexual encounter*? * - You must have seen CLERKS to appreciate this comment I guess that depends. If you are British, then apparently this is about as significant as a thank-you peck on the first date. Let's stick to intercourse, and forego the outercourse.
xpaperxcutx Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 I'd like to believe bj's are considered a sexual encounter. You're still getting some kind of release.
Nemo Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 I'd like to believe bj's are considered a sexual encounter. You're still getting some kind of release. Maybe guys should add one for their left or right hand, and two for both. Just to be fair about it.
xpaperxcutx Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 Maybe guys should add one for their left or right hand, and two for both. Just to be fair about it. There's a difference between masturbation and bjs. You can get stds from bjs. And my point was that sexual encounters= possibility of gettings stds.
JP77 Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 Isn't that statement kind of contradictory? Unless slum means strawberry lover's ultimate motherland, or something like that. Do you live in Britain? Well that's your general opinion. But not all british 19 yr olds are like that? Sort of like where I live, my state does have a high pregnancy rate for teenagers, but the statistics usually comes from one specific area of that state. And mostly a lot of different things play into the role of why ppl get pregnant. Like race, culture.. etc Again, I am talking about the whole of society and not just 19 year old's who are too thick to put on a condom.
Recommended Posts