Mary Shadows Posted February 17, 2008 Posted February 17, 2008 This is for the men...again..do you like the hard to get females, or the easy ones. If you found yourself attracted to a certain girl, and then she put out, would you move on, or go back to her, and what separates the girls who just want to have fun from the ones you could possible date?? And, how would you know>!?
Peter_pan Posted February 17, 2008 Posted February 17, 2008 i personally like the chase. but when i have them i am disappointed or uncertain to carry it on or not. i think that some "hard to get girls" are really not worth it. there standards are way to high and for what there looks:? pfft !!! the only thing they would be lucky to get is a one night stand to be honest. oh and i dont like the easy to get girls either. I prefer shy girls who you can get to know. if they remain shy then it can also be a problem. yeah im picky.
Yamaha Posted February 17, 2008 Posted February 17, 2008 I look for a girl who has interest but not- in- your- face agressive. A man wants to be the agressor but if you play to hard to get he will move on ( unless he is a player ). Not giving sex to early will help you decide if the guy is around for more than his own pleasure. Most guys only spend time with people they want to be with so if he is into you he will want to be with you.
Curmudgeon Posted February 17, 2008 Posted February 17, 2008 This is for the men...again..do you like the hard to get females, or the easy ones. If you found yourself attracted to a certain girl, and then she put out, would you move on, or go back to her, and what separates the girls who just want to have fun from the ones you could possible date?? And, how would you know>!? But along with loving the challenge, I don't like to play games and don't like others who do. If a woman is hard to get because she's discerning, lacks trust, is guarded because she's been previously hurt and let down, that's one thing and is decidedly challenging. If she plays hard to get as a game or tries to make me jealous by playing the piutting one against the other game, I write her off immediately. As for "putting out," if we've spent some time together (dated for awhile) and there is some intensity of feeling other than just lust then I would certainly be back. If it was tantamount to a ONS then I wouldn't. I have always dated rather than just seeking to have "fun." The difference is always very clear right from the start. I prefer to spend my time with someone of character and subsrtance and a party animal or someone promiscuous just doesn't interest me.
Lizzie60 Posted February 17, 2008 Posted February 17, 2008 First I would like to correct you... we don't say 'easy' girl.. we say: 'HORIZONTALLY ACCESSIBLE.'
Curmudgeon Posted February 17, 2008 Posted February 17, 2008 First I would like to correct you... we don't say 'easy' girl.. we say: 'HORIZONTALLY ACCESSIBLE.' Would the converse of that be "vertically temporary?" And what would it be called if a standing position was preferred?
monkey00 Posted February 17, 2008 Posted February 17, 2008 I admit I do like a little chase. I don't want the girl to play too hard to get..if that's the case then likely she isn't interested. I like a girl that has a life of her own, but doesn't come to me at the beck of my call. But let's me know I've got a shot with her.
amerikajin Posted February 17, 2008 Posted February 17, 2008 I like girls with whom I know I am compatible. I have dated women who were hard-to-get and drop-dead gorgeous, and in some cases it has turned out to be disappointing. To be honest, there are times when I am really attracted to a hot, super confident woman -- maybe we all are to some degree. But I think I'd rather end up living with someone who's level of confidence is closer to mine - confident but not too confident. I don't need a chase, but it worries me when I know that someone just latches on to me right off the bat.
mental_traveller Posted February 17, 2008 Posted February 17, 2008 I prefer easy girls who put out asap.
Recommended Posts