Pyro Posted February 6, 2008 Posted February 6, 2008 First, I think we can all agree that cheating hurts people and that intentionally hurting people is wrong. So... how do you make a moral relativist argument based on that? Hey, I don't have to murder someone to know that it's wrong! Second, Cheating is a singular event. Thus if you cheat, you are therefore a cheater. Time only moves one direction, you can't go back and re-write history. So I am not exactly sure how you can argue that suddenly a person can no longer be a cheater once they have already done it. I never once said that cheating was not wrong. I agree that its wrong. We are referring to a repeat offender here.
Recommended Posts