Pyro Posted November 30, 2007 Posted November 30, 2007 Home by 10? Are you sure you can't extend that just a little, for me, sweetie? You like busty as well? I suppose we can extend it just a bit.
Trialbyfire Posted November 30, 2007 Posted November 30, 2007 You like busty as well? I suppose we can extend it just a bit. Okay, I can't keep a straight face with the thought of you as a 40DD. I don't think it suits you.
Pyro Posted November 30, 2007 Posted November 30, 2007 Okay, I can't keep a straight face with the thought of you as a 40DD. I don't think it suits you. I was shooting more for some EE's. Go big or go home.
Trialbyfire Posted November 30, 2007 Posted November 30, 2007 I was shooting more for some EE's. Go big or go home. I don't even know what double E's look like. Are they bigger than a breadbox?
Pyro Posted November 30, 2007 Posted November 30, 2007 I don't even know what double E's look like. Are they bigger than a breadbox? They are probably about the same size. Anyone with EE's out there care to chime in?
Trialbyfire Posted November 30, 2007 Posted November 30, 2007 They are probably about the same size. Anyone with EE's out there care to chime in? Looks like there's no one admitting to them. Here's two buckets you could use.
Pyro Posted November 30, 2007 Posted November 30, 2007 Looks like there's no one admitting to them. Here's two buckets you could use. Thanks. I just hope that the OP isn't disappointed when me meet up.
Trialbyfire Posted November 30, 2007 Posted November 30, 2007 Thanks. I just hope that the OP isn't disappointed when me meet up. Don't worry sweetie, you'll be a hit!
Pyro Posted November 30, 2007 Posted November 30, 2007 Don't worry sweetie, you'll be a hit! Thanks. I won't disappoint you.
Author Sunblast Posted November 30, 2007 Author Posted November 30, 2007 I'm all yours but if its a school night I have to be home by 10. K? No big. I read Lolita. -H.H.
Author Sunblast Posted November 30, 2007 Author Posted November 30, 2007 This post is kinda in response to the whatever some chick wrote on LS. So this is the stuff I want. There's no girl alive with a dual breadbox and a normal weight and the rest of it. There's some crazy-big cows out there with big racks, but big, blech. Just a bunch of fat for the soap factory. But 36C, or D, is about best. Past that and it's quickly getting ugly.
shadowofman Posted November 30, 2007 Posted November 30, 2007 1. Tall- height doesn't matter 2. Busty- just pretty, size isn't an issue 3. Proper hips:waist- butts prefered 4. Proper weight- light 5. Under 15% body fat- prefered 6. Bi- fingers crossed 7. F'd up and therefore horny and emotional- and promiscuous 8. Smart helps- a must 9. Loyal- a must 10. Tells me if she cheats- in all the griddy details:love: 11. Loves me, nuff said
sb129 Posted November 30, 2007 Posted November 30, 2007 Busty, with a butt AND under 15% body fat? Don't ask for much, huh For that to be possible she would have to be skeletal with a boob job, and possibly butt implants. Niiiice.
bigheartkindsoul Posted November 30, 2007 Posted November 30, 2007 Busty, with a butt AND under 15% body fat? Don't ask for much, huh For that to be possible she would have to be skeletal with a boob job, and possibly butt implants. Niiiice. Er yeah totally, is this for real!!! Kinda reads as a joke. <15% body fat with 36C bust Does OP know that 36 is kinda fairly average size, and def would not be found on someone with sub 15% body fat. I think OP is looking for busty school girl or the impossible but each to their own I guess.
BeautifulMystique Posted November 30, 2007 Posted November 30, 2007 I definitely don't fit the requirements. Come to think of it, I'm very glad I don't.
sb129 Posted November 30, 2007 Posted November 30, 2007 The OP reads to me as a mysogynist who is out to expose the evil, superficial ways of women. He has a very distinct "retaliation" tactic that is a common theme in his threads. He is also perfect, and can't believe how so many people here on LS have the audacity to ask for R or dating advice that DUH everyone should know the answers to! He seems to belong to the "Beware unsuspecting men, she could turn on you at any time! She is only interested in you if you are either incredibly handsome or wealthy, preferably both!" club. What a crock.
Leia Posted November 30, 2007 Posted November 30, 2007 He seems to belong to the "Beware unsuspecting men, she could turn on you at any time! She is only interested in you if you are either incredibly handsome or wealthy, preferably both!" club. What a crock. I despise men who think a woman look for a man that is wealthy and good looking. It's sad that some still think money and looks can make a woman go weak. He'll be surprised that there is a number of men out there that look for wealthy women. I think that is what he secretly is looking for too.
Author Sunblast Posted November 30, 2007 Author Posted November 30, 2007 Check out normal 20yr girls - not the cows, the slim ones. They're mostly under 15%. And many have nice racks.
Trialbyfire Posted November 30, 2007 Posted November 30, 2007 Check out normal 20yr girls - not the cows, the slim ones. They're mostly under 15%. And many have nice racks. What do you bring to the table that makes you feel you're entitled to your list of requirements?
sb129 Posted November 30, 2007 Posted November 30, 2007 Check out normal 20yr girls - not the cows, the slim ones. They're mostly under 15%. And many have nice racks. Do you have anything more than anecdotal evidence to support this claim? 15% or less bodyfat is what many athletes work hard to maintain. 15% or less in a woman is very, very thin, and if you are anywhere in the western world, this is not "normal" as the average weights are getting higher and higher as people are getting fatter. Many TEENAGE girls have low bodyfat percentages, but thats because they are not fully developed yet. I cannot stand it when people throw around medical terms without having a full understanding of them.
Trialbyfire Posted November 30, 2007 Posted November 30, 2007 Do you have anything more than anecdotal evidence to support this claim? 15% or less bodyfat is what many athletes work hard to maintain. 15% or less in a woman is very, very thin, and if you are anywhere in the western world, this is not "normal" as the average weights are getting higher and higher as people are getting fatter. Many TEENAGE girls have low bodyfat percentages, but thats because they are not fully developed yet. I cannot stand it when people throw around medical terms without having a full understanding of them. For Women up to the age of 30: Essential Fat: 12 - 15% Athletes: 16 - 20% Fitness: 21 - 24% Acceptable: 25 - 31% Obese: 32%+ I'm guessing the OP is gauging his body fat requirements on male percentages, instead of female percentages. I doubt he realizes what a woman would look like with 15% body fat and a 36C bustline.
Author Sunblast Posted December 2, 2007 Author Posted December 2, 2007 24 hour fitness has a huge chart saying, for chicks, that up to 5-8% is essential fat.
Author Sunblast Posted December 2, 2007 Author Posted December 2, 2007 They are certainly more right than saying 30% of lard is acceptable on a chick.
sb129 Posted December 2, 2007 Posted December 2, 2007 I don't think that 30% is acceptable. But I think that 15% is undesirable, unhealthy, unrealistic, and most of all UNCOMMON. You keep saying its some kind of "norm". It isn't. An acceptable range for an ATHLETE is 14%-20% Think Paula Radcliffe () An acceptable range for a normal woman is 21%-30%. Anything over 30% is regarded as obese. Your chart should already say that, except I think you are fixated on the number '15'
Recommended Posts