Jump to content

Why shouldn't OW's sue lying MM's?


While the thread author can add an update and reopen discussion, this thread was last posted in over a month ago. Want to continue the conversation? Feel free to start a new thread instead!

Recommended Posts

  • Author
Posted

This is where we are getting off track...

 

what about the OP, who knows, who cares (and is being creeped out by the ring)...but is being brainwashed into believing that the M is over.... has been over for some time, and they will eventually live in affairy land together forever.

 

 

This is what I seem to be seeing on this forum a lot.

That's a given. ;)

But, if the OP doesn't care and already knows, it's no biggy.

Personally, I'd feel creeped out to be with a guy, who's M and keeps his ring on during our time together.

Tha says WIFE right there. She might as well be sitting next to the cheating couple.

Posted
This is where we are getting off track...

 

what about the OP, who knows, who cares (and is being creeped out by the ring)...but is being brainwashed into believing that the M is over.... has been over for some time, and they will eventually live in affairy land together forever.

 

 

This is what I seem to be seeing on this forum a lot.

 

That's just it, she makes that choice to believe a man who's lying to his W.

I don't understand where, no matter what excuse he gives the OW for why he's cheating and how reasonable it sounds, she decides to accept this liar. This is the guy who has a 50/50 chance of doing her the same way he's doing his W.

×
×
  • Create New...