Jump to content

W is stalking me again??????

BurriedAlive

By BurriedAlive
in The Other Man / Woman

 Share
While the thread author can add an update and reopen discussion, this thread was last posted in over a month ago. Want to continue the conversation? Feel free to start a new thread instead!

Recommended Posts

Trialbyfire Established Member

Trialbyfire

Posted
Posted
Thats true, I have to agree with that.

 

On the flip side there was a post in the Infidelity forum not too long ago and BS was complianing that she had a tracking device on her Myspcae account and could see the the ex OW checks out her page frequently. All the BSs went BERZERK telling her to confront her and that the OW was psycho and that she had every right to feel violated and that the OW was ""stalking" her etc., you should remeber that thread TBF pretty sure you posted in it....The best part is the only reason the BS knew her profile was being looked at was because SHE had a tracking device to monitor the OW it had been years POST break-up. Pftttlolololol :lmao:

I'm sorry but some of the posts here jus totally crack me up!

There's no reason for the OW to check up on the wife. After all, the wife needs ammunition for the potential divorce, where the OW is only indulging in stalking behaviour.

RealityCheck Established Member

RealityCheck

Posted
Posted
It's probably because as an OW, you find the behaviour threatening. Since I don't date or have relationships with MM, it doesn't bother me. If someone wants to check to see if I'm seeing her husband, she's more than welcome to do so because I have nothing to hide. I might even invite her in for something to drink, in case she gets thirsty sitting outside. :laugh:

 

TBF...

 

I don't believe for one second that an "OW" is the only person that would find someone invading their premises, work, etc threatening!

 

It would be anyone!

 

It's sick! Plain and simple! Sick! obsessed behavior!

Tomcat33 Established Member

Tomcat33

Posted
Posted
It's probably because as an OW, you find the behaviour threatening. Since I don't date or have relationships with MM, it doesn't bother me. If someone wants to check to see if I'm seeing her husband, she's more than welcome to do so because I have nothing to hide. I might even invite her in for something to drink, in case she gets thirsty sitting outside. :laugh:

 

 

:lmao::lmao: I don't not at all! I find it sad, and laughable, it makes me laugh at the BS that she is so pathetically consumed by what her H did to her that she is prancing around this OW's garden and the OW can see all of this.

I am embarassed for her. She chose to stay with a man who she has to go out and hunt down. It's pathetic!

 

Sorry but I just envision this crazy woman dressed up with a hat that has tree branches coming out of it, in a camouflaged green track suit and hding behind a huge plam leaf running across her law trying to get a glimps inside the living room window and I cant's stop laughing. :lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:

Trialbyfire Established Member

Trialbyfire

Posted
Posted
TBF...

 

I don't believe for one second that an "OW" is the only person that would find someone invading their premises, work, etc threatening!

 

It would be anyone!

 

It's sick! Plain and simple! Sick! obsessed behavior!

We are discussing a woman who's husband had an affair with another woman. If you can't differentiate a reasoning difference between the two, I can't help you.

 

I hope this poor woman gets her evidence and nails his derriere to the wall.

Trialbyfire Established Member

Trialbyfire

Posted
Posted
:lmao::lmao: I don't not at all! I find it sad, and laughable, it makes me laugh at the BS that she is so pathetically consumed by what her H did to her that she is prancing around this OW's garden and the OW can see all of this.

I am embarassed for her. She chose to stay with a man who she has to go out and hunt down. It's pathetic!

 

Sorry but I just envision this crazy woman dressed up with a hat that has tree branches coming out of it, in a camouflaged green track suit and hding behind a huge plam leaf running across her law trying to get a glimps inside the living room window and I cant's stop laughing. :lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:

Your imagination is working overtime but then fantasy appeals, doesn't it?

 

As specified by the OP, the wife is driving around. Somehow you've managed to create a ridiculous scenario from it. So odd.

Tomcat33 Established Member

Tomcat33

Posted
Posted
There's no reason for the OW to check up on the wife. After all, the wife needs ammunition for the potential divorce, where the OW is only indulging in stalking behaviour.

 

 

AND there we have it ladies and gentlemen EXIBIT B: (exhibit A happened in another thread last week) THE DOUBLE STANDARD.

 

But of course, when it's the BS doing the stalking she is preparing her amunition for the D (which coincidentally does happen even after she has a whole trunk filled with evidence) , when it's the OW doing the stalking she is psycho! :lmao::lmao::lmao:

Trialbyfire Established Member

Trialbyfire

Posted
Posted
AND there we have it ladies and gentlemen EXIBIT B: (exhibit A happened in another thread last week) THE DOUBLE STANDARD.

 

But of course, when it's the BS doing the stalking she is preparing her amunition for the D (which coincidentally does happen even after she has a whole trunk filled with evidence) , when it's the OW doing the stalking she is psycho! :lmao::lmao::lmao:

Sleep with someone's husband and expect that the wife joins the party in some fashion, when she finds out. Seems fair to me.

Tomcat33 Established Member

Tomcat33

Posted
Posted
Your imagination is working overtime but then fantasy appeals, doesn't it?

 

As specified by the OP, the wife is driving around. Somehow you've managed to create a ridiculous scenario from it. So odd.

 

 

I think that's where you are missing the point the scenario IS ridiculous, the BS is patrolling the OW's house. It doesn't get any more ridiculous than that. But if you think that's normal then I won't bother explaining it to you....Please don't make me envision you in a tree branch outfit as well. :lmao::lmao:

  • Like 1
Trialbyfire Established Member

Trialbyfire

Posted
Posted
I think that's where you are missing the point the scenario IS ridiculous, the BS is patrolling the OW's house. It doesn't get any more ridiculous than that. But if you think that's normal then I won't bother explaining it to you....Please don't make me envision you in a tree branch outfit as well. :lmao::lmao:

So...it's okay for a PI but not for the wife, who may or may not be able to afford a PI?

Tomcat33 Established Member

Tomcat33

Posted
Posted
Sleep with someone's husband and expect that the wife joins the party in some fashion, when she finds out. Seems fair to me.

 

Hun the OW is sitting here writing about seeing this woman patrol outside her house, it sounds pretty pathetic to me and the BS looks like a complete fool!

 

I mean c'mon get a grip, leave the cheater and pull yourself together woman. I mean we all do stupid things but circling around the OW's house looking for her H, yikes!! Does that woman have no dignity at all?

Trialbyfire Established Member

Trialbyfire

Posted
Posted
Hun the OW is sitting here writing about seeing this woman patrol outside her house, it sounds pretty pathetic to me and the BS looks like a complete fool!

 

I mean c'mon get a grip, leave the cheater and pull yourself together woman. I mean we all do stupid things but circling around the OW's house looking for her H, yikes!! Does that woman have no dignity at all?

If she captures him entering on film, just more evidence for the divorce, which equates to dollars and cents. Good for her, I say, to be willing to beard the lion in it's den.

 

It's no fun sleeping with a MM who can only afford Mac'n Cheese...:lmao:

Tomcat33 Established Member

Tomcat33

Posted
Posted
So...it's okay for a PI but not for the wife, who may or may not be able to afford a PI?

 

 

 

Unless PI stands for "propel idiot" as in kick the cheater's a$$ as far away from your life possible, I WOULD NEVER suggest a PI. Wast of money waste of time especially after you found out he cheated on you duuuuuh! That wasn't my idea that was yours. I said take the money and go to Hawaii and come back and get a D.

Trialbyfire Established Member

Trialbyfire

Posted
Posted
Unless PI stands for "propel idiot" as in kick the cheater's a$$ as far away from your life possible, I WOULD NEVER suggest a PI. Wast of money waste of time especially after you found out he cheated on you duuuuuh! That wasn't my idea that was yours. I said take the money and go to Hawaii and come back and get a D.

Oh honey, the PI was worth every penny. I got my pound of flesh from both the OW and my ex-H. To purr for...

annabelle75 Established Member

annabelle75

Posted
Posted
There's no reason for the OW to check up on the wife. After all, the wife needs ammunition for the potential divorce, where the OW is only indulging in stalking behaviour.

 

 

No no no no no !!!

 

I'm so sick of hearing this. Its OK for a BS to stalk an OW? Its the most twisted double standard I have ever heard. If an OW was driving around the BSes house you would be the first to condemn her and tell the BS to call the police. Stalking is against the law. Doesn't matter who does it or why. The police don't care. Its legal to sleep with a married man. Sorry to burst your bubble, but its true.

 

Its not the OPs fault that the BS decided to stay married to a cheater she cannot trust. Its not the fault of the OW that the W married a cheater. There is no justification for stalking her.

Trialbyfire Established Member

Trialbyfire

Posted
Posted
No no no no no !!!

 

I'm so sick of hearing this. Its OK for a BS to stalk an OW? Its the most twisted double standard I have ever heard. If an OW was driving around the BSes house you would be the first to condemn her and tell the BS to call the police. Stalking is against the law. Doesn't matter who does it or why. The police don't care. Its legal to sleep with a married man. Sorry to burst your bubble, but its true.

 

Its not the OPs fault that the BS decided to stay married to a cheater she cannot trust. Its not the fault of the OW that the W married a cheater. There is no justification for stalking her.

The wife has not entered her private property, contacted her in any way or threatened her, beyond driving by her house. This is not legally stalking.

Tomcat33 Established Member

Tomcat33

Posted
Posted
If she captures him entering on film, just more evidence for the divorce, which equates to dollars and cents. Good for her, I say, to be willing to beard the lion in it's den.

 

 

It's no fun sleeping with a MM who can only afford Mac'n Cheese...:lmao:

 

Well if after a mere D all a man can afford is Macncheese, he couldn't be much of a catch to begin with.

whichwayisup Established Member

whichwayisup

Posted
Posted
Its not the fault of the OW that the W married a cheater.

 

No, but the OW helped him become a cheater. She was his partner in crime...

Trialbyfire Established Member

Trialbyfire

Posted
Posted
Well if after a mere D all a man can afford is Macncheese, he couldn't be much of a catch to begin with.

Guess again. Divorce can be expensive...

Tomcat33 Established Member

Tomcat33

Posted
Posted
Oh honey, the PI was worth every penny. I got my pound of flesh from both the OW and my ex-H. To purr for...

 

 

Yeah I can see that, you blew 5K on a guy who told you your H was INDEED A cheater. I should have been a PI that's the easiest money you can ever make.

And in Canada it means SQUAT because you are not entitlted to anymore because of infidelity so save it on it gave you so much more, you just paid someone to knock over the head with a 2x4.

 

yeah sounds really smart to me!!!:lmao::lmao:

 

Aaaa looo haaa eeee....Hawaii...

annabelle75 Established Member

annabelle75

Posted
Posted
The wife has not entered her private property, contacted her in any way or threatened her, beyond driving by her house. This is not legally stalking.

 

As far as you know. Perhaps the OW needs to do a little "checking up" of her own.

 

I'm sorry but a woman driving circles around some other woman's house just screams crazy. If she wanted a divorce she already has plenty of proof (the original D-day), she doesn't need more. Stop trying to excuse this woman's obsessive behavior. Can't you just concede that this woman might be a little nuts? Or do you live in a land where every woman that has been cheated on is some sort of sweet innocent patron saint? You don't have to excuse the actions of every BS. This isn't your battle.

Trialbyfire Established Member

Trialbyfire

Posted
Posted
Yeah I can see that, you blew 5K on a guy who told you your H was INDEED A cheater. I should have been a PI that's the easiest money you can ever make.

And in Canada it means SQUAT because you are not entitlted to anymore because of infidelity so save it on it gave you so much more, you just paid someone to knock over the head with a 2x4.

 

yeah sounds really smart to me!!!:lmao::lmao:

No sweetheart, I blew five figures, which I could easily afford. I had my opportunity to use it but only used it for personal reasons such as my pound of flesh from both offenders. I simply don't need money...

 

You might want to find out a little more about divorce law in Canada, previous to stating this...

annabelle75 Established Member

annabelle75

Posted
Posted
No, but the OW helped him become a cheater. She was his partner in crime...

 

Nope. A cheater is a cheater. If it wasn't her it would have been some one else.

Trialbyfire Established Member

Trialbyfire

Posted
Posted
As far as you know. Perhaps the OW needs to do a little "checking up" of her own.

 

I'm sorry but a woman driving circles around some other woman's house just screams crazy. If she wanted a divorce she already has plenty of proof (the original D-day), she doesn't need more. Stop trying to excuse this woman's obsessive behavior. Can't you just concede that this woman might be a little nuts? Or do you live in a land where every woman that has been cheated on is some sort of sweet innocent patron saint? You don't have to excuse the actions of every BS. This isn't your battle.

Probably in jealousy...

annabelle75 Established Member

annabelle75

Posted
Posted
No sweetheart, I blew five figures, which I could easily afford. I had my opportunity to use it but only used it for personal reasons such as my pound of flesh from both offenders. I simply don't need money...

 

You might want to find out a little more about divorce law in Canada, previous to stating this...

 

You blew 5 figures just to get revenge? That's sane and healthy.

Trialbyfire Established Member

Trialbyfire

Posted
Posted
You blew 5 figures just to get revenge? That's sane and healthy.

Wouldn't you blow a miniscule amount of money for a little lesson in life. Consider it cruel to be kind.

While the thread author can add an update and reopen discussion, this thread was last posted in over a month ago. Want to continue the conversation? Feel free to start a new thread instead!
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...