Is it Wrong To Look At A Woman As An Sex Objects At All?

[Hazy]

Dude, I think it would be worth your while to invest in a Live Doll. Then you literally have an object for Sex.

[Hyperpen12000]

Dude, I think it would be worth your while to invest in a Live Doll. Then you literally have an object for Sex.

 

I think you should let all the hair grow out all over your body, cut your head balled, and see how many men will find just your brain attractive enough to want you sexually.

 

Get a clue buddy, pal, dude.

[Hyperpen12000]

I distinguish between finding a woman sexy and being attracted to her sexually, and seeing her as a sex object.

 

Sex object - to me - means that you view the woman solely as a means for you to get off...i.e., her pleasure isn't the least bit important and you don't offer it because you're solely interested in using her to get hard and get off (porn girls, strippers, whatever).

 

So yes, I'd say you shouldn't ever look at or treat a woman in a relationship as a sex object...unless that's part of your mutually agreed upon sex games you play together in the bedroom.

 

Yes, it all depends on what sex object means to you. I just think it's compelling for a guy to in some way. When a guy wants a woman sexually, he wants her body more than anything else. Dressing in sexy lingerie for your mate clearly specifies that you want him to objectively want you sexually. You want him to want your body.

[Hazy]

Whether you want sex or not, a human being is a living thing, which is different than a literal object. You still have to take care with a human being as you can cause physical and emotional pain, so you totally treat a woman as a person, not an object without feelings (physical and emotional). For example, you wouldn't just throw a woman on the bed without watching that she not hit the mattress or that her head not hit the headboard and cause her physical pain. You would just throw a pillow down without much care, because you can't cause physical pain to a pillow. If you are having sex too rough and she starts screaming in pain for some reason, you would stop, because she is a living thing and you would not want to cause her physical pain if for some reason that was the case, be it she was bleeding or you were too rough and she wasn't wet or whatnot. So....even if you are just looking to have sex, you do have to "view" women as human beings, not "objects." The Live Doll thing was not really a joke because you can have sex with the Live Doll and treat it like a literal object.

[Hazy]

I think you should let all the hair grow out all over your body, cut your head balled, and see how many men will find just your brain attractive enough to want you sexually.

 

Get a clue buddy, pal, dude.

 

My sexual attractiveness has nothing to do with this thread. Stay on topic, please. Thanks.

[Hyperpen12000]

Dude, I think it would be worth your while to invest in a Live Doll. Then you literally have an object for Sex.

 

Me needing a doll has nothing to do with this topic either... You're personally assaulting me as if this is a personal discussion. Quit with your bias backlashing and stay on topic.

[Hyperpen12000]

Whether you want sex or not, a human being is a living thing, which is different than a literal object. You still have to take care with a human being as you can cause physical and emotional pain, so you totally treat a woman as a person, not an object without feelings (physical and emotional). For example, you wouldn't just throw a woman on the bed without watching that she not hit the mattress or that her head not hit the headboard and cause her physical pain. You would just throw a pillow down without much care, because you can't cause physical pain to a pillow. If you are having sex too rough and she starts screaming in pain for some reason, you would stop, because she is a living thing and you would not want to cause her physical pain if for some reason that was the case, be it she was bleeding or you were too rough and she wasn't wet or whatnot. So....even if you are just looking to have sex, you do have to "view" women as human beings, not "objects." The Live Doll thing was not really a joke because you can have sex with the Live Doll and treat it like a literal object.

 

You complete misunderstood everything stated! In no means am I suggesting to look at all women as just sex objects. All I'm saying is that a part of us looks at an individual we desire in that way whether it's consciously or subconsciously. Women are not innocent of this either. When we want someone sexual, we're desiring every aspect of their body. The human boy is an object of beauty. It's evident that both sexual structure of the body and personally makes it sensual, but to stay we should never look at each other objectivity is an assail at being humane.

 

It seems like this is more personal to you than anything..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

___________________________________

objectivity - Judgment based on observable phenomena and uninfluenced by emotions or personal prejudices.

[Topper]

Is it wrong to look at a woman asa sex object? You have a multi billion dollar industry built on "looking at woman as sex objects." No I'm not talking about the sex trade. I'm talking about the fashion industry.

[Hazy]

Is it wrong to look at a woman asa sex object? You have a multi billion dollar industry built on "looking at woman as sex objects." No I'm not talking about the sex trade. I'm talking about the fashion industry.

 

Not really. Just because a woman dresses nicely and in fashion does not mean she is focused at being looked at a sex object, I have no idea where you are getting that. Looking nice doesn't have to be related to sex.

[Hyperpen12000]

Anyone who thinks that is oblivious and has been mentally conditioned that sexy (which is obviously sex) is cute.