Is it Wrong To Look At A Woman As An Sex Objects At All?

[Hyperpen12000]

I don't think there’s nothing wrong with looking at woman as a sex object. The problem is when a guy looks at all women that way and nothing more. I think being attracted to a woman before or during a relationship objectively, can’t be helped. Of course personality is a requisite but even that's put into category of being an asset to sexual attraction. Guys are extremely visual creatures. When a guy sees a woman with the particular physique he likes, that makes him want her; in some cases:lmao:, want to get to know her.

 

Men have to be objectively attracted to women to be sexually aroused. That’s what makes intimacy stimulating for a man. To put any other emphasis on a woman, when having sex, just makes it seem like a chore or uninteresting. What guys seriously thinks of how intelligent his woman is when having sex?

 

 

 

 

 

 

_________________________________________

OH! YOU’RE SO INTELLIGENT! I THINK I’M ABOUT TO ORGASM!

[Hyperpen12000]

You guys are so sad. I got 20 people commenting on this topic on another message board than I do here. But hey, I shouldn't fault you for being indifferent to the topic.

[alphamale]

I don't think there’s nothing wrong with looking at woman as a sex object.

both sexes look at each other as sex objects....if they didn't then the human race would have died out long ago.

[Lizzie60]

OK... maybe like you say to some extent... but I definitely think that intelligence is a big turn-on both for men and women.

 

Not just the body... the brain is probably a higher turn-on...it is for me anyway. If the guy is a hunk but is an idiot...he won't turn me on.

[alphamale]

Not just the body... the brain is probably a higher turn-on...

thats such baloney

 

If the guy is a hunk but is an idiot...he won't turn me on.

the majority of "hunks" are idiots...just like the majority of hotties are air heads

[Hyperpen12000]

OK... maybe like you say to some extent... but I definitely think that intelligence is a big turn-on both for men and women.

 

Not just the body... the brain is probably a higher turn-on...it is for me anyway. If the guy is a hunk but is an idiot...he won't turn me on.

 

I think that's true for women but guys are different. With some men, intelligence complements the beauty. Beauty always comes first.

[lonelybird]

Have you ever heard the story?

 

A man and a woman know each other from mail, after loooong period of communication, they fall deeply in love with each other. and they even never meet before. and finally they meet, and got married. still deeply in love with each other

 

where is this man objectify this woman? no where

[whichwayisup]

Question to you Hyperpen12000. Do you respect women or JUST see women as a sexual object? What are YOUR view on women in general?

 

Do you enjoy their company, find them interesting, funny, intelligent, special, or do you JUST see them as someone to f*uck?

 

Just wondering.

[McFadden]

Men have to be objectively attracted to women to be sexually aroused. That’s what makes intimacy stimulating for a man. To put any other emphasis on a woman, when having sex, just makes it seem like a chore or uninteresting. What guys seriously thinks of how intelligent his woman is when having sex?

 

 

 

_________________________________________

OH! YOU’RE SO INTELLIGENT! I THINK I’M ABOUT TO ORGASM!

 

 

WHAT'S MY IQ..COME ON SCREAM MY IQ BABY..SCREAM IT! Lol I have a story about this of course. One time this guy I was hanging out with was kind of drunk and he kept telling me about a friend of mine, 'your friend is really hot, she's a babe' and listing features about her he liked. Then after several more drinks he was like, 'Your a really sweet person' and then tried to start kissing me. Well I didn't kiss him. It was kind of insulting hahah, as if he couldn't find anything good to say about my appearance. I want people to think I'm a nice and great person and ect most of the time but if youre about to have sex with the person its nice if they think youre physically attractive.

[cn283]

People can do whatever the hell they want I suppose...I propose women start acting more like men, (going to strip clubs, looking at porn, checking out guys in front of their bf, masturbating rather than having sex) that way everything would be equal, and no one would have anything to complain about.

[alphamale]

People can do whatever the hell they want I suppose...I propose women start acting more like men, (going to strip clubs, looking at porn, checking out guys in front of their bf, masturbating rather than having sex) that way everything would be equal, and no one would have anything to complain about.

um, you're forgetting that most women don't like that stuff and many men do

[Hazy]

It depends on the context of the situation. If it is a situation where the woman wants to be viewed that way, such as a model of the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue, sure. In the office, and dealing with women on an everyday basis, men should keep any inappropriate thoughts to themselves and avoid ogling to be respectful.

[Hazy]

People can do whatever the hell they want I suppose...I propose women start acting more like men, (going to strip clubs, looking at porn, checking out guys in front of their bf, masturbating rather than having sex) that way everything would be equal, and no one would have anything to complain about.

 

I just don't date guys who visit strip clubs, and are into porn. There really are lots that aren't into it and prefer a real woman with a brain.

[Hyperpen12000]

Question to you Hyperpen12000. Do you respect women or JUST see women as a sexual object? What are YOUR view on women in general?

 

Do you enjoy their company, find them interesting, funny, intelligent, special, or do you JUST see them as someone to f*uck?

 

Just wondering.

 

If you read my comment it clearly states that I don't look a women as just sex objects. All of what you said is profound and required; finding them interesting, funny, intelligent, special, etc,. But to say physically wanting a woman objectively is nonexistent is prevarication. When a man wants a women physical he lusts everything about her from head to toe. That is what stimulates a man. Whether you're a man who likes the physique of a petite woman or a plus size. A woman's body is what turns most men on. So men can't help but to objectively look at women in that way; more so your mate.

 

I think it's wrong for guys to just look at women as sex objects. What I'm saying is, for women (or anyone) to try to eliminate that notion completely, is impossible and ridiculous. None of us would be here. A part of us has to.

 

 

 

___________________________________________________

Objectively - Judgment based on observable phenomena and uninfluenced by emotions or personal prejudices

[Hyperpen12000]

It depends on the context of the situation. If it is a situation where the woman wants to be viewed that way, such as a model of the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue, sure. In the office, and dealing with women on an everyday basis, men should keep any inappropriate thoughts to themselves and avoid ogling to be respectful.

 

I agree but if you're wearing attire that's provocative (mini skirts and tops that show cleavage) women shouldn't get offended if they get funny looks. Sexy is sex. Comments should be kept to themselves though.

[Hyperpen12000]

Have you ever heard the story?

 

A man and a woman know each other from mail, after loooong period of communication, they fall deeply in love with each other. and they even never meet before. and finally they meet, and got married. still deeply in love with each other

 

where is this man objectify this woman? no where

 

That's true but how often does that happened? And you can't say if he finds her sexually attractive objectively. Otherwise he would be Bi.

[Hazy]

I agree but if you're wearing attire that's provocative (mini skirts and tops that show cleavage) women shouldn't get offended if they get funny looks. Sexy is sex. Comments should be kept to themselves though.

 

You obviously aren't employed in the professional world. you can always say "if.." whatever.

Your original question is so general that it actually doesn't make any sense, no offense.

It's inside your head, and you can "view" women however the hell you want. If it's "right" or not, well, you're the one doing the "viewing" so you have to decide that one for yourself.

[directx]

Have you ever heard the story?

 

A man and a woman know each other from mail, after loooong period of communication, they fall deeply in love with each other. and they even never meet before. and finally they meet, and got married. still deeply in love with each other

 

where is this man objectify this woman? no where

 

Ever read the Martian Chronicles? There is a great chapter about a guy falling in love with a woman by just phone conversations. I won't spoil the ending.

[Hyperpen12000]

You obviously aren't employed in the professional world. you can always say "if.." whatever.

Your original question is so general that it actually doesn't make any sense, no offense.

It's inside your head, and you can "view" women however the hell you want. If it's "right" or not, well, you're the one doing the "viewing" so you have to decide that one for yourself.

 

Well yeah I am! you're obviously not! I know how to control myself but you can't get upset that I look.

 

No offense taking. If your ignorant to the fact you can't comprehend then it's not my fault. Wish you the best.

[Hazy]

Obviously I am and obviously you aren't, and obviously you don't know how to post a question to a thread which actually makes sense and isn't biased to promote your own agenda.

I wasn't getting upset at all, it's just when someone has a logical response to your question, you get all bent out of shape yourself, "hyper" pen.

[Hyperpen12000]

Obviously I am and obviously you aren't, and obviously you don't know how to post a question to a thread which actually makes sense and isn't biased to promote your own agenda.

I wasn't getting upset at all, it's just when someone has a logical response to your question, you get all bent out of shape yourself, "hyper" pen.

 

Obviously you're self-analyzing me just like everyone else tries to do to each other on here. Are you a psychologist? Do you personally know me? If You don't understand the question because it's a little "Hazy" to you, don't personally attack me. This question was inspired by a group discussion I had.

 

I agreed with a lot of what you said. My response was general not direct like yours.

 

Cool down with the insults and I'll refrain from mine.

[Hyperpen12000]

The only reason it probably doesn't make sense is because it's a sensitive subject. You first have to define what "sex object" means to you. If it means an entity that is only useful for sexual pleasure (A piece of meat), then is would seem incoherent.

 

To me, (most) sexual objectiveness emphasizes a person’s sexual attributes and physical attractiveness. There’s an appropriate and inappropriate times to have these views. Some women I’ve talk to believe that man should never look at a woman as an sex object in a relationship or not...NEVER! To completely debunk or extinguish those thoughts are ridiculous. A part in all of us has to look at a person in an objective way to want them sexually.

[Hazy]

Then yes, it is wrong to view women as sex objects, because even the woman at the strip club is a living human being, not an inanimate object like a pillow or a table. People have feelings, and all human beings should be first viewed as human beings, not objects. Just like animals are not "objects," they are living beings and should be treated and respected as such.

[halfarock]

Guys are extremely visual creatures. When a guy sees a woman with the particular physique he likes, that makes him want her…

 

…Men have to be objectively attracted to women to be sexually aroused. That’s what makes intimacy stimulating for a man…

…but guys are different. With some men, intelligence complements the beauty. Beauty always comes first.

If it is a woman’s beauty that is the deciding factor in a guy liking a woman, that turns on a guy; then how do you account for women who aren’t beautiful but still have boyfriends and husbands.

[norajane]

Some women I’ve talk to believe that man should never look at a woman as an sex object in a relationship or not...NEVER! To completely debunk or extinguish those thoughts are ridiculous. A part in all of us has to look at a person in an objective way to want them sexually.

 

I distinguish between finding a woman sexy and being attracted to her sexually, and seeing her as a sex object.

 

Sex object - to me - means that you view the woman solely as a means for you to get off...i.e., her pleasure isn't the least bit important and you don't offer it because you're solely interested in using her to get hard and get off (porn girls, strippers, whatever).

 

So yes, I'd say you shouldn't ever look at or treat a woman in a relationship as a sex object...unless that's part of your mutually agreed upon sex games you play together in the bedroom.