Curmudgeon Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 Hmm! Could he be saying that because he's ::::dare I say it:::: whipped?
Hyperpen12000 Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 Nor is it his fault that you're all wet. My guess is that you're as incapable of cooking as you are disinclined to open doors. Women probably don't like you because of your lack of manners and grace and now you're angry at them as well as angry at the men they do like. The operative word in my original post was "gentleman!" That appears to be a concept that escapes you! Pity! But of course and as always, that's just one man's opinion. Well, that's not true... I can cook well. I just cooked some Japanese Fired Rice for my GF last night. One of her favorite dishes she loves for me to cook! Men who are SUPPOSE to practice chivalry is the same as saying women are SUPPOSE to know how to cook. It's all prehistoric. Just being polite is enough. There are a lot of men AND WOMEN who disagree that women knowing how to cook and men praticing chivalry is not prehistoric but indebted. You guys are just a hand full of people on this site who think differently. But if you or your SO can't cook, that your parents fault! Don't get mad at me because you've been over zealously submissive to your wife all these years.
Hyperpen12000 Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 Wet, hungry and frustrated... Confused, hungry, and sexually frustrated:lmao:
Hyperpen12000 Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 ...it's no wonder you've had bad luck with them. Does your wife know you demean and look down upon her gender? Obviously, but for, perhaps, your wife, you've chosen extremely badly in your lifetime. My guess would be no. Do you really think that she would stay with him if she knew how he felt about her gender? Maybe he's sick and tired of the double-standards against men you bedimmed-mines have seem to embrace or gain immunity to.
Curmudgeon Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 Let's not be double-standard shall we. Thankfully, I believe you're in the vast minority of those who believe chivalry, a good definition of which is: "The collective term for the social codes of knighthood that originated in France in the Middle Ages. It was based on brave, courteous and honourable behaviour – what came to be known as 'gentlemanly conduct' " is prehistoric, especially, since the recording of history began about 1,200 years earlier. There are women and there are ladies. The latter recognize, appreciate and enjoy chivalrous or gentlemanly behavior from a man. That you persist in demeaning it says far more about you than it does about them or about those who practice it!
Curmudgeon Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 Well, that's not true... I can cook well. I just cooked some Japanese Fired Rice for my GF last night. One of her favorite dishes she loves for me to cook! There are a lot of men AND WOMEN who disagree that women knowing how to cook and men praticing chivalry is not prehistoric but indebted. You guys are just a hand full of people on this site who think differently. But if you or your SO can't cook, that your parents fault! Don't get mad at me because you've been over zealously submissive to your wife all these years. First of all, fried rice is Chinese, not Japanese. I happen to cook in a number of "languages" including Chinese, Japanese and Korean since I've lived in all three countries. My wife is an excellent cook, tending towards southern in cuisine which is a nice change from my rather international cooking, and we love cooking together so I guess our Mommas raised us up right and without regard to gender-specific roles in that respect. Since your charcterization of my relationship with my wife is also all wet, there's nothing to be angry about. Clearly you're more to be pitied than scorned.
Hyperpen12000 Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 Thankfully, I believe you're in the vast minority of those who believe chivalry, a good definition of which is: "The collective term for the social codes of knighthood that originated in France in the Middle Ages. It was based on brave, courteous and honourable behaviour – what came to be known as 'gentlemanly conduct' " is prehistoric, especially, since the recording of history began about 1,200 years earlier. There are women and there are ladies. The latter recognize, appreciate and enjoy chivalrous or gentlemanly behavior from a man. That you persist in demeaning it says far more about you than it does about them or about those who practice it! I don't believe that..... Once again, you're sadly mistaking. I believe in chivalry. I practice it. I've even gotten complements from women. This 65 year old lady said to me, "It's good to know there are still a few good gentlemen left." Chivalry is a stereotype, politeness is not. A lot of men today still think a woman knowing how to cook is a gift and monitory. Just like a lot of women think chivalry is monitory. Well, let me ask you this.... What are the duties and conduct of being a lady? __________________________ Another FD:(
Hyperpen12000 Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 Just the other day I saw a mother yelling at her son for not holding the door open for her.
Curmudgeon Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 Just the other day I saw a mother yelling at her son for not holding the door open for her. She's teaching him manners!
Curmudgeon Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 Is that "monitory" as in "admonitory" or did you mean mandatory? Either way, what are you afraid of?
Woggle Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 My wife agrees with me for the most part. I wouldn't trust any woman that didn't.
Hyperpen12000 Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 She's teaching him manners! HAHAHAHA!:lmao: you're pretty whipped yourself huh? Submissively Overzealous!
Hyperpen12000 Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 Is that "monitory" as in "admonitory" or did you mean mandatory? Either way, what are you afraid of? oops! I wish I can edit it. I meant mandatory! We'll if being submissive to your wife and wecloming double-standards against men is your forte. More power to you!
Hyperpen12000 Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 Then you're equally yoked. Pity! Maybe he's sick and tired of the double-standards against men your bedimmed mind has seemed to welcome or gain immunity to. You've become politically correct to it.
Curmudgeon Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 ... gender challenged and confused about the relative roles since you're singing the same, sad song on that board as well. I hope you find yourself, wherever that may be. Do you like the name-calling and finger-pointing? By the way, that could be considered admonition!
Curmudgeon Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 You don't have the first idea of what you're talking about. But you already know that, don't you? You're simply firing for effect. However, you're shooting duds. You've yet to say anything enlightened or original. Your insults are impotent, which may be a concept you can grasp.
Hyperpen12000 Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 ... gender challenged and confused about the relative roles since you're singing the same, sad song on that board as well. I hope you find yourself, wherever that may be. Do you like the name-calling and finger-pointing? By the way, that could be considered admonition! Well it seems your pretty good at it too! The name-calling and finger-pointing! Can't teach an old lion new tricks! _____________________________________ Old fools were once young fools who just so happen to survive their idiocy.
Curmudgeon Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 Can't teach an old lion new tricks! Suffice it to say, you certainly can't. Good day!
Hyperpen12000 Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 Suffice it to say, you certainly can't. Good day! I guess your wife has huh? Good day to you too.
lonelybird Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 Submissive is a bliss ps. which is different from "taking crap"
Trialbyfire Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 Submissive is a bliss ps. which is different from "taking crap" Oh stop it. Submission to a guy like that would be suicide. A real man doesn't need submission, he needs a partner to enrich his life. If his self-esteem and self-respect requires a doormat, he's not much of a man.
Trialbyfire Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 Better yet, get a puppy who will fawn all over you, regardless if you whip it or not.
lonelybird Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 Oh stop it. Submission to a guy like that would be suicide. A real man doesn't need submission, he needs a partner to enrich his life. If his self-esteem and self-respect requires a doormat, he's not much of a man. Did you see my ps.? The more you are submissive, the more he wants to be a MAN, the more he wants to protect you . how about that? why you always misunderstand my message.... Fully embrace your feminine side
Recommended Posts