Ripples Posted May 10, 2007 Posted May 10, 2007 For goodness sake! It makes no difference whatsoever if the wife uses a wheelchair. She can still be a bitch, she can still be loving, she can still be sexual, she's just a person. The chair is irrelevant. It's sickening that a woman would feel more remorse after discovering the MM's wife is disabled than if she were not. The pain caused is the same whether the woman uses a wheelchair, crutches, or has no mobility impairments. It's also sickening that disability is still seen as something to be pitied. Get over yourselves, disabled people don't need your patronisation.
Ripples Posted May 10, 2007 Posted May 10, 2007 For goodness sake! It makes no difference whatsoever if the wife uses a wheelchair. She can still be a bitch, she can still be loving, she can still be sexual, she's just a person. The chair is irrelevant. It's sickening that a woman would feel more remorse after discovering the MM's wife is disabled than if she were not. The pain caused is the same whether the woman uses a wheelchair, crutches, a hearing aid, a helping dog or is a conventionally perfect example of the human body. It's also sickening that disability is still seen as something to be pitied. Get over yourselves, disabled people don't need your patronisation. On the other hand, it's refreshing to see the majority of posters of this thread disregarding the disabled issue.
Chrome Barracuda Posted May 10, 2007 Posted May 10, 2007 For goodness sake! It makes no difference whatsoever if the wife uses a wheelchair. She can still be a bitch, she can still be loving, she can still be sexual, she's just a person. The chair is irrelevant. It's sickening that a woman would feel more remorse after discovering the MM's wife is disabled than if she were not. The pain caused is the same whether the woman uses a wheelchair, crutches, a hearing aid, a helping dog or is a conventionally perfect example of the human body. It's also sickening that disability is still seen as something to be pitied. Get over yourselves, disabled people don't need your patronisation. On the other hand, it's refreshing to see the majority of posters of this thread disregarding the disabled issue. LOL, what was the point of that vent? Do you have a disability? It doesnt matter he should have explained the situation up front with the woman instead of lying about it. he took away her choice by lies of omission. When she found out she should have left period. Like I said his wife is suffering and he's banging someone else that is just plain wrong.
Ripples Posted May 10, 2007 Posted May 10, 2007 She knew he was married and that is a good enough reason for not sleeping with him. His wife's impairment is irrelevant.
Chrome Barracuda Posted May 10, 2007 Posted May 10, 2007 She knew he was married and that is a good enough reason for not sleeping with him. His wife's impairment is irrelevant. I agree. wholeheartedly! it just looks doubly wrong. wheelchair or no wheelchair.
Recommended Posts