I was reading another thread and I have a thought about breaking trust or lack there of.
Heres kinda the situ I read about and it has me wondering.....
lets say you have a slight distrust of your SO. So you do some snooping (cell phone, IM's, email, etc...) and find some evidence that can justify the distrust. You go ahead and confront them, and they inturn accuse you and say they dont trust you anymore becasue you snooped thru there stuff.
So what gives?....how can one be labled as untrustful becasue they snooped to find evidence to support their distrust of the other person. I mean SO #1 was doing things that were distrustful, then SO #2 snoops and finds outs....but then SO#1 turns it around to say SO#2 is the untrustful one becasue they snooped.
I dont get it