Jump to content

The confusion about what attracts women


ParadeRain

Recommended Posts

This is something I've noticed...

 

When a women thinks about what she wants in a man, what would be ideal for her, what attracts her...

 

Most seem to think about stable men, intelligent, romantic, flattering, charming, legit hardworking men who will treat them like princesses, sweep them off their feet to adore and love them bla bla bla.

 

But when they're not thinking about it, when they are letting the nature of their minds take it's natural course... what makes them really weak at the knees is quite the opposite.. it's the spontaneous, mysterious, exciting, risky badboys... "I know I should't go there, but my thighs are dripping wet for him"...

 

 

Most women will say this is untrue, yet most women will also deny being a slut even though the fact is they are horny for sex just as much as men are! Truth is all women are sluts, they are human beings, their minds are programmed to want SEX, it's only the set standards of some generations who deemed it a "bad thing" which make it so "taboo".. but deep down it's a fact, whether you want to admit it or not.

 

My point is... that mysterious lifestyle, fast car and cool aura is going to get you more women than good manners, roses and romance.

Edited by a LoveShack.org Moderator
Language
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't want a 100% badboy - BTDTGTT.

 

However, a guy who is mostly the former with a splash of spontaneity is just the right mix. Thankfully, the SO fulfils the criteria, even down to the red sports car, which he inherited and hides in his garage because it's too garish (I agree).

 

I can't say much about the last sentence in your OP. I guess it depends on your relationship goals.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, it's better if you can provide both ;). It doesn't have to be either or.

 

Of course there are things that some women will find attractive on a primal level (I think even here, not all women want the exact same thing), but it's not always the "bad boys" who provide it.

 

I agree basically that the nice guy stuff won't get you the girl, you actually have to have other things going on to offset that. Just like being a bad boy will only work to get you pussy so long before it dries up.

 

The point is, a lot of guys simply do not know how to be attractive - especially regarding the particular demographic of women they may be attracted to. And it's possible to learn.

 

As for women all being "sluts"......well, I don't really think this is true. I think women have a very powerful sex drive, but it's not really ignited by exactly the same things as it is for men. As it is, women are likely to sexually submit to only the man they find worthy of them.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Huh, so I must be imagining the 'stable men, intelligent, romantic, flattering, charming, legit hardworking man' that I've actually been with for years and have never ever regretted being with.

 

Time to get myself checked out, I guess.

Link to post
Share on other sites
This is something I've noticed...

 

When a women thinks about what she wants in a man, what would be ideal for her, what attracts her...

 

Most seem to think about stable men, intelligent, romantic, flattering, charming, legit hardworking men who will treat them like princesses, sweep them off their feet to adore and love them bla bla bla.

 

But when they're not thinking about it, when they are letting the nature of their minds take it's natural course... what makes them really weak at the knees is quite the opposite.. it's the spontaneous, mysterious, exciting, risky badboys... "I know I should't go there, but my thighs are dripping wet for him"...

 

 

Most women will say this is untrue, yet most women will also deny being a slut even though the fact is they are horny for sex just as much as men are! Truth is all women are sluts, they are human beings, their minds are programmed to want SEX, it's only the set standards of some generations who deemed it a "bad thing" which make it so "taboo".. but deep down it's a fact, whether you want to admit it or not.

 

My point is... that mysterious lifestyle, fast car and cool aura is going to get you a lot more pussy than good manners, roses and romance.

 

There is a tiny kernel of truth in this post. Women like surprises, no one wants a predictable relationship.

 

Nice guys win when they take a little risk and go for some physical contact. If I am on the fence for someone, and they go for even an innocent thing, like an arm touch, the next thing I am wondering is what would it be like if they touched somewhere else. Or of course: I really don't like this guy. The good thing is, it really escalated the decision making process.

 

Knowing how to dance can work too. ;) Salsa dancing + someone you are attracted to = #winning

Link to post
Share on other sites

women = a hard case to crack.

we live in puzzles, we drop tonnes of hints. we tend to confuse men sometimes intentionally and sometimes unintentionally. at most times, we dont even know what we want! so i guess it depends on what the opposite sex has to offer.

 

honestly, i like a little bit of both

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's all because of feminism, dude. The ideal burly man of ol' that will provide and protect you and your offspring died with the 70's because he's perceived to make the girl look weak. Now it's the damaged, misunderstood "project" that's in. If a girl can find one of those and fix it up, she now feels important. The problem there is that fixing psychological problems isn't quite as easy as fixing a car, so these rarely evolve into serious relationships.

 

For instance, my ex pursued me specifically BECAUSE I was an ******* (seriously, I called her a bitch and she started Skyping with me that night). I even warned her I had problems and that she probably wouldn't want me after a while, but she insisted. Didn't matter that we didn't have a lot in common, she wanted that project. Well, it took four years for her to get the message, but yup, I was right, she just didn't have the magic touch. Now she's with my (ex) best-friend (who I introduced her too). They have loads in common, he makes her laugh, and he's not nearly as psychologically damaged as me (his only personality quirk is that he takes NOTHING seriously, I'm curious to see how that works out).

 

That's the good news for all you descent gentlemen, stop going after girls, the women know better.

Edited by Nik1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Women are manufactured offshore in third world countries, where they come off express lines baked into gingerbread women. They think, act and want exactly the same men, most often jerks and losers. The end.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Confidence. it's cliche, but key. :laugh:

 

 

You can put lipstick on a pig, but it'll always be a pig, or if you prefer, you can always polish a turd, but at the end of the day, it's still a turd.

 

Confidence only gets you so far.

 

What is attractive to a women could be many things, it could start off with physical attraction or emotional attraction.

 

If it's the latter, it's more likely that it'll start with confidence, but expand once she gets to know someone better. Social responsibility and ranking is also very useful.

Link to post
Share on other sites
You can put lipstick on a pig, but it'll always be a pig, or if you prefer, you can always polish a turd, but at the end of the day, it's still a turd.

 

Confidence only gets you so far.

 

What is attractive to a women could be many things, it could start off with physical attraction or emotional attraction.

 

If it's the latter, it's more likely that it'll start with confidence, but expand once she gets to know someone better. Social responsibility and ranking is also very useful.

It's still better to be confident than not. Think about it.

 

The amount of energy people spend trying to prove confidence is BS, they could use that energy to actually build up their confidence. Yes, social ranking is helpful too.

Link to post
Share on other sites
It's still better to be confident than not. Think about it.

 

The amount of energy people spend trying to prove confidence is BS, they could use that energy to actually build up their confidence. Yes, social ranking is helpful too.

 

My experience shows that yes, "confidence" does help, but so does blatently ignoring something. After all, confidence is knowing the limits and being able to work with them, right? People can mistake confidence as being something else.

 

Confidence is like a starter in a light, other things keep it going.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That confidence stuff is bull****, I was confident as hell with this one girl the other night and I just ended up making her cry and leave the party with her boyfriend. (this is not a joke, a fifth of cheap brandy and half a fifth of Jack Daniels makes you do terrible things)

Link to post
Share on other sites
×
×
  • Create New...