Jump to content

What does 'spiritual' mean?


Recommended Posts

OK, I'm a crusty old athiest - but am always open to learning about other's beliefs.

 

I keep hearing about people being 'spiritual' as opposed to being religious. What does being spiritual mean? And how do you experience it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's used these days to denote someone who believes in some kind of cosmic omnipotence without necessarily adhering to any particular religion. Spirituality follows the new age practice of pulling from various philosophies and religions ideologies and practices that suit the individual while discarding what doesn't. Emcompasses old school ideologies like religion, gnosticism as well as newly made up stuff like Wicca and new age thought.

 

Spiritual has become this catch-all that basically means anything not related to mundane life like working, paying bills and owning stuff. Anything one would ordinarily associate with Gods, God worship, pertaining to the soul, and unseen aspects of life typically described as mystical.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
Justanaverageguy

Buddhists description is pretty accurate in describing how its most frequently used. I guess for me the core of spirituality is not about the mystical persay. More just the belief in a higher purpose \ higher power. Describing the unseen elements and actions that connect us with that and with each other. So I think all religions and religious people are automatically spiritual - but all spiritual people aren't necessarily religious.

 

Religion tends to have a specific doctrine that must be followed. Codified set of beliefs from a holy text of some sort and\or explicit interpretations of concepts or laws that must be adhered to. Sometimes (not always) religions will say their interpretation is the only correct way or only true God. This is where religion and spirituality really diverge. People who say they are "Spiritual" generally think all the religions are essentially tapping into the same thing and just have different ways and methods of describing it and practicing it. So like Buddhist says they take parts from different teachings that work for them. Instead of seeing one set path all must follow - spirituality sees many paths that you can travel to the same destination. You have the ability to choose the one that works for you.

 

As for how you "experience" the spirit. Sometimes this might be equated with a "peak experience" like a spiritual awakening or mystical type thing. But my interpretation of the word is simply that the collective creates something larger. We are all connected and part of it. Having a spiritual experience to me simply means tapping into or doing work that contributes to that something larger. Going beyond our own limited selfish view of the world. So you could also experience it simply by helping someone else who needs assistance. That good feeling you get after doing it and contributing towards the larger collective is spiritual to me.

Edited by Justanaverageguy
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I also think that a lot of people use it to mean secular without having to say words atheist or agnostic... probably raised Christian, now agnostic, but still have family and community built around the church. Spiritual is vague enough that it can be interpreted as believing in God, or the mystical power of the universe, but not organized religion.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I also think it's an informal way of saying you're in touch w your feelings and not always hyper-rational. (And at times that's a built-in excuse for rationalizing your philosophical and emotional contradictions. And I don't really mean that in a judgmental way, just that lots of ppl aren't exactly rational straight thru and they need an out for that that serves as a character defense more than an intellectual argument.)

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Author

Thanks for taking the time to answer. You've all done a great job of explaining. I hear it a lot, so now I won't be wondering what they are talking about :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
Cheryl11111111111111

Spiritual is something that isn't man made. It's natural. It's beliefs that go beyond human form. It's being in touch with the natural existence before the worlds distortion. "lies". Basically when adam and eve at the apple of knowledge, the knowledge was lies. We believe so much in external factors that we are blocked from the internal factors. A lot of confusing within oneself will cause a spiritual journey. Lots of people just live life and don't think about this. spiritual goes beyond human form!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Michelle ma Belle

Thanks to OLD where identifying one's religious beliefs seems to be part of dating profiles anymore, I have found myself checking off 'Spiritual' more often than not despite having been raised Catholic. In my everyday life, I also identify much more with being spiritual than part of any one particular organized religion.

 

For ME, being a spiritual person is synonymous with being a person whose highest priority is to be loving to yourself and others. A spiritual person cares about people, animals and the planet, and strives to be a kind person. A spiritual person knows that we are all One, and consciously attempts to honor this Oneness.

 

You can go to church every Sunday and say your prayers every day, without caring about being kind and loving to yourself, others and to the planet. You can practice yoga and meditate every day without being conscious of what is loving and what is not loving in your thoughts and actions. You can belong to a spiritual group and devotedly follow the teachings, yet still be judgmental toward yourself and others in your daily life.

 

There are many people who do not practice a religion, who do not meditate, pray or belong to any group, who are very spiritual people. These people naturally do caring things for others. They think about how they can help. Their thoughts are kind rather than judgmental toward themselves and toward others. When you look at them, you see kindness in their eyes.

 

There are many religious people who are anything but kind. We all know of religious people who are extremely judgmental, righteous and outright mean. Can you be both religious and spiritual? Of course! But only when you are operating in your religion from your heart rather than from the learned dogma of your mind.

 

One of my favorite quotes of all time that describes my own belief is from Gandhi;

 

"Like the bee gathering honey from the different flowers, the wise person accepts the essence of the different scriptures and sees only the good in all religions"

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Biblically speaking, the spirit world does not mean non-physical. It would mean more along the lines of super-physical; in other words extending beyond and surpassing the physical world. Spirits are not these vague ideas that are "less real" than physical bodies. No, they are MORE real. In fact, angels in the bible, while their PRIME state is to be invisible, they CAN materialize in physical form. The sense in the bible when they do this is not that they are elevating status going from spirit to body; rather they are debasing and lowering themselves--as if to say, "Eh...it's time to take on that corruptible and nasty body again."

 

When we die, those who are resurrected at Christ's return will not be ghosts or invisible. We will be PHYSICAL BODIES. While it seems like a contradiction, the bible uses the phrase "spiritual bodies" to describe our resurrected bodies. They are incorruptible and eternal. When Jesus was resurrected he had his disciples physically touch him. They did. The same is promised to us.

 

So the take home message is that the spirit world is MORE real.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
I keep hearing about people being 'spiritual' as opposed to being religious. What does being spiritual mean? And how do you experience it?

Hi basil67.

I think...it's mostly people who were born into, or are currently living in, a Christian-based society, who can come to feel that they want to acknowledge their sense/belief/ faith/confidence in a Higher (Cosmic or Universal) Power, yet the traditional 'Christian' teachings do not resonate; they feel incomplete or lacking in some way.

 

For me, saying that I'm "spiritual but not religious" is more of a short-cut to help others understand that, while I do believe in true Christ-based teachings, I also believe in true Bhudda-based teachings, especially the Universal or Cosmic Law of Cause and Effect (or 'Karma'; Kamma in Pali). And, I do NOT believe in any 'angry, wrathful, vengeful' Creator-God-in-the-sky'. (Which, of course, Jesus never taught about such a Being, in any case.)

 

I don't know that people experience spirituality - or 'religiousness', for that matter. It may just be more of a personal worldview or perspective upon which one bases one's thoughts, feelings and actions; or, from which one lives one's life.

 

In Light,

Ronni

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

This is what "spiritual" means to me. I take religion as a guide to live a better life, but religion is not something I take literally. Religion is more of a moral compass I use to live my life by. I see myself as spiritual, but I see religion more as some great philosophical teachings to help you grow as a person. I also don't confine myself to studying one religion. I have studied Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Gnosticism, and Taoism. I take what I find are the best teachings in all the religions I have studied along with the teachings on morality by philosophers like Kant, Aristotle, Plato, Lock, Hobbs, Nietzsche, Descartes, Sartre, and Rousseau to mold this into the kind of morality I choose to live my life by.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Definition:

Of, relating to, or affecting the human spirit or soul as opposed to material or physical things.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Simple Logic
OK, I'm a crusty old athiest - but am always open to learning about other's beliefs.

 

I keep hearing about people being 'spiritual' as opposed to being religious. What does being spiritual mean? And how do you experience it?

 

As an athiest, you believe your strength comes internally.

 

Someone spritual believes their strength comes externally.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Spiritual is something that isn't man made. It's natural. It's beliefs that go beyond human form. It's being in touch with the natural existence before the worlds distortion. "lies". Basically when adam and eve at the apple of knowledge, the knowledge was lies. We believe so much in external factors that we are blocked from the internal factors. A lot of confusing within oneself will cause a spiritual journey. Lots of people just live life and don't think about this. spiritual goes beyond human form!

It wasn't an apple that they ate, it was the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and bad.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Justanaverageguy
As an athiest, you believe your strength comes internally.

 

Someone spritual believes their strength comes externally.

 

Actually -

 

Some who is atheist: You believe your strength comes internally.

Some who is religious: You believe your strength comes externally.

Someone who is spiritual: You believe the inner and outer are the same thing.

 

:)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Justanaverageguy
This is what "spiritual" means to me. I take religion as a guide to live a better life, but religion is not something I take literally. Religion is more of a moral compass I use to live my life by. I see myself as spiritual, but I see religion more as some great philosophical teachings to help you grow as a person. I also don't confine myself to studying one religion. I have studied Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Gnosticism, and Taoism. I take what I find are the best teachings in all the religions I have studied along with the teachings on morality by philosophers like Kant, Aristotle, Plato, Lock, Hobbs, Nietzsche, Descartes, Sartre, and Rousseau to mold this into the kind of morality I choose to live my life by.

 

Yes exactly. When it comes down to it "religion" is about "specific details" - "spirituality" is about "universal laws". Thus we can say different religions that follow the same "universal laws" are compatible with each other.

 

I look at it in an "east" vs "west" way. The west values finite and definitive knowledge - logic and reason - direct study and measurement of facts, figures, temperatures to differentiate things etc. We can use this study of facts figures to understand the physical world, our bodies etc so we can plan or make changes accordingly. It also values "physical proof" over "intuitive understanding" of the way things happen. In spiritual terms this view is also reflected with western religion. "Gods" in the west being defined very precisely - with specific details which are proclaimed as the only truth and defended (eg: a white man on a cloud with a grey beard, world created in x,y,z many days). For a specific view of god to be "correct" all others must be wrong because "god" or shall we say the "devil" is quite literally in the details :) To the west - specifics and details are everything - you cannot have two gods with different details thus I can't be a christian and also follow another faith.

 

The eastern approach to spirituality focuses on infinite wisdom - it builds on the western approach but tries to see past finite details to universal laws that can be applied across different disciplines of life. It sees common patterns between all things. "Brahman" the energy force of the universe is seen as the core pattern from which all other things flow and manifests itself into a beautiful explosion of different forms. They think details and the physical forms Brahman manifests as are temporary. Whilst important - focusing too much on these - or believing if you just dig deep enough and break things down into small enough parts you will find the answer - is kind of infantile. They believe understanding the infinite "pattern" of life is the answer rather then the different ways it manifests into finite details.

 

So in spiritual terms this is again reflected. The eastern tradition see "GOD" or "Brahman" as a pattern of energy which cannot be understood through "specific details" because they are always changing. It is instead understood through the pattern of its behavior. To "see god" is simply to see something which is perfectly in tune with the highest form of this pattern which they see as beautiful, joyful and blissful. The goal of spirituality is thus to live in tune with the gods\universe\brahmans "way of being". To behave how god does in all aspects of your life. This is the eastern interpretation of what is meant by "a second coming", what New age foke refer to as "christ consciousness". To personally become a living embodiment of that energy or as Yoda would say - to become one with the force. :lmao:

 

Thus in spiritual terms schools and teachings that followed this "pattern" were not seen as incompatible. Vedic, Hindu, Buddhist - yoga, tai chi, qi gong - were not mutually exclusive - but rather different ways of exploring and expressing the same glorious pattern of "god".

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Buddhists description is pretty accurate in describing how its most frequently used. I guess for me the core of spirituality is not about the mystical persay. More just the belief in a higher purpose \ higher power. Describing the unseen elements and actions that connect us with that and with each other. So I think all religions and religious people are automatically spiritual - but all spiritual people aren't necessarily religious.

 

Religion tends to have a specific doctrine that must be followed. Codified set of beliefs from a holy text of some sort and\or explicit interpretations of concepts or laws that must be adhered to. Sometimes (not always) religions will say their interpretation is the only correct way or only true God. This is where religion and spirituality really diverge. People who say they are "Spiritual" generally think all the religions are essentially tapping into the same thing and just have different ways and methods of describing it and practicing it. So like Buddhist says they take parts from different teachings that work for them. Instead of seeing one set path all must follow - spirituality sees many paths that you can travel to the same destination. You have the ability to choose the one that works for you.

 

As for how you "experience" the spirit. Sometimes this might be equated with a "peak experience" like a spiritual awakening or mystical type thing. But my interpretation of the word is simply that the collective creates something larger. We are all connected and part of it. Having a spiritual experience to me simply means tapping into or doing work that contributes to that something larger. Going beyond our own limited selfish view of the world. So you could also experience it simply by helping someone else who needs assistance. That good feeling you get after doing it and contributing towards the larger collective is spiritual to me.

 

What about Buddhists who become aggressive?

Seen a fair bit of that.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Justanaverageguy
What about Buddhists who become aggressive?

Seen a fair bit of that.

 

That was a reply to a commentor above me with the scren name Buddhist :p

 

Is he aggressive ?

Edited by Justanaverageguy
Link to post
Share on other sites
The goal of spirituality is thus to live in tune with the gods\universe\brahmans "way of being". To behave how god does in all aspects of your life. This is the eastern interpretation of what is meant by "a second coming", what New age foke refer to as "christ consciousness". To personally become a living embodiment of that energy or as Yoda would say - to become one with the force.

This is exactly to what Jesus referred, when he said, "Believe me that I am in the Father and the Father is in me", and, "I and my Father are one." Which, of course, Jesus is our most prominent role-model for demonstrating full Christ Consciousness on Earth or for being 'the living embodiment of the Christ'.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Justanaverageguy
This is exactly to what Jesus referred, when he said, "Believe me that I am in the Father and the Father is in me", and, "I and my Father are one." Which, of course, Jesus is our most prominent role-model for demonstrating full Christ Consciousness on Earth or for being 'the living embodiment of the Christ'.

 

And so we would say the christian way - and teachings of the east are also compatible. The "spirit" of the different religious teachings are the same.

Link to post
Share on other sites
And so we would say the christian way - and teachings of the east are also compatible. The "spirit" of the different religious teachings are the same.

Yes, exactly! All true religious or spiritual teachings speak to the same thing - inner wholeness and inner oneness with 'the Force', as you said. :).

"The kingdom of God is within."

At this point of understanding, then, it doesn't matter if we use the word 'religious' or the word 'spiritual' to help us describe our faith or personal philosophy or belief system or whatever we want to call it.

 

In Light and Love.

Ronni

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
That was a reply to a commentor above me with the scren name Buddhist :p

 

Is he aggressive ?

 

No, but a fair few are.

 

I also know a mentally ill woman who paid for a Buddhist retreat weekend ($300) and came home thinking she could become a member of the royal family.

 

Too, I met a guy who chanted for a block of gold, and went mad imagining that it had materialised in front of him.

Edited by darkmoon
Link to post
Share on other sites
Justanaverageguy
No, but a fair few are.

 

I also know a mentally ill woman who paid for a Buddhist retreat weekend ($300) and came home thinking she could become a member of the royal family.

 

Too, I met a guy who chanted for a block of gold, and went mad imagining that it had materialised in front of him.

 

Yes of course - I've met angry Buddhists and I've met angry Christians.

Just like I've met gentle compassionate Buddhists and gentle compassionate Christians.

 

I think if you look at the spiritual "quality" of both Buddhist and Christian teachings they are both high - and promote compassion, love, understanding, moral behavior etc etc. But that doesn't mean people follow what the teachings say. It's about the pattern of behavior they follow - not about which religion they belong to.

Edited by Justanaverageguy
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Author
No, but a fair few are.

 

I also know a mentally ill woman who paid for a Buddhist retreat weekend ($300) and came home thinking she could become a member of the royal family.

 

Too, I met a guy who chanted for a block of gold, and went mad imagining that it had materialised in front of him.

 

There are people who identify as many different religions but who do not act in line with the teachings of the faith.

 

I'm Australian. A nations which was invaded by English Christians. And today, I see a whole lot of what I believe is very unChristian behaviour.

Edited by basil67
Link to post
Share on other sites
×
×
  • Create New...