[northstar1]

Originally Posted by disgracian

Not to mention the way these vacuously true logical statements are held up as logical proof for god's existence, when they fall well short.

It is, afterall, very easy to construct a meaningless and/or ridiculous statement that is logically true. If you shoot for proof, you need to aim a little higher. Each premise can be broken down into a logical statement of its own, and each of those premises can be broken down likewise to form compount statements. It wouldn't take very much effort to dismantle most of the supporting premises that make up the Quinquae viae.

Cheers,
D.

Pretty much what I was going to say.