getting normal knowledge

[jean-luc sisko]

I want normal life knowledge, who is to stop/prevent me?

[Art_Critic]

The only thing stopping you from getting normal life knowledge is your lack of it..

 

Oh well... seems since you lack it you then you will never have it.. kinda a catch 22...

[jean-luc sisko]

I want normal life knowledge, who is to stop me?

[Art_Critic]

I want normal life knowledge, who is to stop me?

 

The only thing stopping you from getting normal life knowledge is your lack of it..

 

 

 

Yourself.. apparently...

[jean-luc sisko]

No, nobody holds the right to stop me.

[Art_Critic]

hahahahaha

[Yer_Blues]

I have all the knowledge in my pocket, and I'm willing to fight you. You will never get it! Ever!

[jean-luc sisko]

what business is it of yours what other people do? lol... You seem odd and warped if you do.

[Yer_Blues]

what business is it of yours what other people do? lol... You seem odd and warped if you do.

Not as warped as you'll be if you try to get the knowledge. You get none of the normal kind. Only the abnormal kind that's been sitting out for a few too many hours and gone sour.

[jean-luc sisko]

Not as warped as you'll be if you try to get the knowledge. You get none of the normal kind. Only the abnormal kind that's been sitting out for a few too many hours and gone sour.

 

lol... excuse me?

 

You essentially have not answered my question; I take it it's unanswerable.

[jean-luc sisko]

hahahahaha

 

what is funny? it's my right and people should simply get over it.

[jean-luc sisko]

Moreover, you people cannot logically debate me. Is my point not contestable?

 

You need locking up in an institution if you reckon that others living their life should bother you.

[Taramere]

Moreover, you people cannot logically debate me. Is my point not contestable?

 

If you can prove that other people are restricting you in some way from pursuing this quest for normal knowledge, or at least provide examples of how you think they are restricting you, then put forward that proof and people can then debate with you. As you have presented no such proof, you are the one being illogical in expounding this point that you're being barred from having normal knowledge of life. The burden is on you to specify exactly how and why you are being restricted - beause unless you can do that, there is nothing to discuss in any useful way.

Edited December 19, 2010 by Taramere

[Yer_Blues]

If you can prove that other people are restricting you in some way from pursuing this quest for normal knowledge, or at least provide examples of how you think they are restricting you, then put forward that proof and people can then debate with you. As you have presented no such proof, you are the one being illogical in expounding this point that you're being barred from having normal knowledge of life. The burden is on you to specify exactly how and why you are being restricted - beause unless you can do that, there is nothing to discuss in any useful way.

You could just make ridiculous posts back, way more fun. He makes these posts every once in a while, it's pretty funny.

 

http://www.loveshack.org/forums/t254346/

 

lol...

[Taramere]

You could just make ridiculous posts back, way more fun. He makes these posts every once in a while, it's pretty funny.

 

http://www.loveshack.org/forums/t254346/

 

lol...

 

I've done that too, but I like to chop and change depending on my mood. I'm kind of interested to see what he'll come back with. Perhaps something along the lines of "you say the burden is on me, and yet you say I'm not being restricted? Do you not see how illogical this is?"

[jean-luc sisko]

If you can prove that other people are restricting you in some way from pursuing this quest for normal knowledge, or at least provide examples of how you think they are restricting you, then put forward that proof and people can then debate with you. As you have presented no such proof, you are the one being illogical in expounding this point that you're being barred from having normal knowledge of life. The burden is on you to specify exactly how and why you are being restricted - beause unless you can do that, there is nothing to discuss in any useful way.

 

You are. You're not providing me with any cogent reason why the normal life knowledge is not gained by default.

[Taramere]

You are. You're not providing me with any cogent reason why the normal life knowledge is not gained by default.

 

By definition, "normal" life knowledge gained by default would be that which most people gain by default....ie common sense, where certain information about the world around you and the people in it just sinks in. If a person is less adept than others at "reading" people and learning certain social norms by a process of osmosis, the first possible reason I can think of for this would be that they might have a condition like Aspergers Syndrome. It doesn't stop people from functioning well, and often holding down very good jobs, but it impacts on their ability to socialise.

 

Typical traits are that they are physically clumsy, use language in an unusual way and have low empathy - finding it difficult to "read" other people. Often they have to be taught in very clear terms how to manage certain social interactions - whereas other people would have a natural sense of what to do. You mentioned in another thread that your cousin had refused to move his bag to make room for a woman, and she had become angry. He and you, it seems, couldn't understand her reaction. Most people would automatically realise that it's anti-social to refuse such a reasonable request, and that behaving in an anti-social manner is liable to result in a negative or even hostile and angry response from others.

 

I don't know you. I don't know what you mean by "normal knowledge" and I have no idea whether you have any sort of condition that would make it harder for you than it is for others to obtain that normal knowledge. Most people are of the view that you're just engaging in a bit of trolling. If you are, I don't have a problem with that. You'd be one of the less offensive trolls out there. However, it could be that you genuinely do have a difficulty in understanding other people - and are presenting that in terms of not having "normal knowledge." I'm not a psychologist, so I can't possibly say with any conviction or guaranteed accuracy "here is why you are not gaining normal knowledge by default." All I can do is present a reason for some people not obtaining normal knowledge - ie the knowledge others have - by default, and that reason would be that they have Asperger's Syndrome. Information about which is freely available on the Internet.

Edited December 20, 2010 by Taramere

[Trimmer]

You're not providing me with any cogent reason why the normal life knowledge is not gained by default.

 

It's because that wasn't your question. Your initial question, repeated several times, was: "Who is to stop me (from acquiring normal life knowledge)?"

 

Nobody stepped up to argue that you should be stopped, and I don't think anyone will. My conclusion, and my answer to your question: no person is likely to stop you from acquiring normal life knowledge. That's the reason there is no debate to be had on your question.

[Yer_Blues]

It's because that wasn't your question. Your initial question, repeated several times, was: "Who is to stop me (from acquiring normal life knowledge)?"

 

Nobody stepped up to argue that you should be stopped, and I don't think anyone will. My conclusion, and my answer to your question: no person is likely to stop you from acquiring normal life knowledge. That's the reason there is no debate to be had on your question.

What is to stop a debate? What do you care, it's my right!?

[jean-luc sisko]

By definition, "normal" life knowledge gained by default would be that which most people gain by default....ie common sense, where certain information about the world around you and the people in it just sinks in. If a person is less adept than others at "reading" people and learning certain social norms by a process of osmosis, the first possible reason I can think of for this would be that they might have a condition like Aspergers Syndrome. It doesn't stop people from functioning well, and often holding down very good jobs, but it impacts on their ability to socialise.

 

Typical traits are that they are physically clumsy, use language in an unusual way and have low empathy - finding it difficult to "read" other people. Often they have to be taught in very clear terms how to manage certain social interactions - whereas other people would have a natural sense of what to do. You mentioned in another thread that your cousin had refused to move his bag to make room for a woman, and she had become angry. He and you, it seems, couldn't understand her reaction. Most people would automatically realise that it's anti-social to refuse such a reasonable request, and that behaving in an anti-social manner is liable to result in a negative or even hostile and angry response from others.

 

I don't know you. I don't know what you mean by "normal knowledge" and I have no idea whether you have any sort of condition that would make it harder for you than it is for others to obtain that normal knowledge. Most people are of the view that you're just engaging in a bit of trolling. If you are, I don't have a problem with that. You'd be one of the less offensive trolls out there. However, it could be that you genuinely do have a difficulty in understanding other people - and are presenting that in terms of not having "normal knowledge." I'm not a psychologist, so I can't possibly say with any conviction or guaranteed accuracy "here is why you are not gaining normal knowledge by default." All I can do is present a reason for some people not obtaining normal knowledge - ie the knowledge others have - by default, and that reason would be that they have Asperger's Syndrome. Information about which is freely available on the Internet.

 

I think people should just get over it, and accept that i will get normal life knowledge. the fact that nobody can present a reason against it says all.

[jean-luc sisko]

If you can prove that other people are restricting you in some way from pursuing this quest for normal knowledge, or at least provide examples of how you think they are restricting you, then put forward that proof and people can then debate with you. As you have presented no such proof, you are the one being illogical in expounding this point that you're being barred from having normal knowledge of life. The burden is on you to specify exactly how and why you are being restricted - beause unless you can do that, there is nothing to discuss in any useful way.

 

Yes, since you've given no evidence as to the processes people use to get such a thing.

[josie54]

I think people should just get over it, and accept that i will get normal life knowledge. the fact that nobody can present a reason against it says all.

 

 

I accept 100% that you will get normal life knowledge, and I believe to the very core of my being that no one has the right to keep normal knowledge from you and that you have every right in the world to have it.

 

If I believe all these things, does that mean we can stop talking about this now?

[Trimmer]

I think people should just get over it, and accept that i will get normal life knowledge. the fact that nobody can present a reason against it says all.

Excellent! I think it's wonderful that you finally made your point, and are going to get what you want! Congratulations, and good luck.

[jean-luc sisko]

It's because that wasn't your question. Your initial question, repeated several times, was: "Who is to stop me (from acquiring normal life knowledge)?"

 

Nobody stepped up to argue that you should be stopped, and I don't think anyone will. My conclusion, and my answer to your question: no person is likely to stop you from acquiring normal life knowledge. That's the reason there is no debate to be had on your question.

 

Then what is the issue? Why can't I be pointed in the way of normal life knowledge?

[Taramere]

Then what is the issue? Why can't I be pointed in the way of normal life knowledge?

 

Go straight ahead, take the second on your left then the third on your right. You should see a shop with a small round window. Usually there's a cat visible through it, on the inside windowsill. If you don't see this, it means you've taken a wrong turning and must start from the beginning. If you do see it, then you're on the right track. Keep going, past the Bon Viveur chocolate shop, the pharmacy and the Barber's shop.

 

Finally, you will see a shop with a sign outside depicting a tree, Adam and Even and the words "Ye olde normal knowledge." Go inside the shop. You will find yourself in a large room. There will be a door on the left and another on the right. Each one is guarded by a man. One of these two men is the person responsible for restricting you in your quest for normal knowledge. He guards the door to freedom and normal knowledge. The other guards the door to death and eternal ignorance. If you had normal knowledge you'd know that at this point I'm stealing ideas, which I wouldn't be able to do if I didn't have so much normal knowledge.

 

Anyway, one of the men always lies. The other always tells the truth. You don't know which is the liar and which is the honest man. You may ask one of them a question. He will answer either yes or no. If you ask the right question, you will know which door to walk through in order to obtain freedom and normal knowledge.

 

Good luck and God speed.