Jump to content

How the heck do people get divorced?


Recommended Posts

Finally in process of divorce after 20 years of marriage- We are going thru mediation but I feel I am at a point of needing lawyer. I make about 4 times the salary as she does. We have the same education (both have college degrees)- I understand the way it works in NJ- it's not based on education and earning potential but your lifestyle over 20 years (we have 3 kids)-

I'm not debating paying her - the issue is that with the calculation sheet the mediator gave us it comes out to owing her almost $3000 a month! (mostly alimony)-- when I do my budget sheet (just what i need to survive)- I am around 4500/month (mortgage-expenses etc etc)-

That exceeds my net pay for the month- Is this normal?? this is all based just on all the calculations from W2- tax statements etc.... I would have -$500.00 every month..... someone help me

Link to post
Share on other sites
Happy Lemming

Many years ago, I took my Dad to a divorce attorney to get some answers to questions I wasn't qualified to respond to. I purchased one hour of time from an attorney for my Dad to get all of his questions answered.

 

I tried to estimate his alimony payments and my Dad told me I was way off base and there was no way he would have to pay that much. After speaking with the attorney, my calculations were within $20/month of what the attorney told him he would have to pay. At that point he decided "It was cheaper to keep her"...

 

I never married and your scenario was one of the deciding factors in my decision making process.

 

Approximately, 23% of men will never marry.

 

That being said, I would get a second opinion from an attorney on the calculations.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO, in your situation, a lawyer is a better bet. Unfortunately, in most jurisdictions the law is still stacked against men so it takes enriching a bulldog of a lawyer to combat anything other than an amicable spouse. At your apparently robust level of iifestyle, I'd consider a lawyer a basic necessity, and not just for divorce. I'd suggest a firm that includes family law, estate planning and tax/financial advice. All three will factor into an effective strategy.

 

Is your spouse amicable? Does she see the stuff the mediator is laying out as unfair to you? What are her suggestions for an equitable agreement? She's employable and employed and can easily waive alimony and split custody on the kids. Would she do that? If she demonstrates inflexibility or unwillingness to negotiate, then stop wasting money on a mediator and get a good lawyer. A top female lawyer ;)

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Law is not a DIY field. Get a lawyer. Remain calm. Be good to your kids & just get this over with. If you are not fighting & bickering the legal bills won't be too bad.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

At the very least, you need to see a local divorce attorney for a hour meeting to get an assessment of your situation. The local attorney will not only know your state laws, but will also have experience with how the local judges apply the law.

 

I’m not familiar with NJ law, but I do know there is a wide variation between the states with respect to the amount of alimony spouses are able to obtain. Also, there is typically a lot of discretion for judges in awarding alimony, so even if there is a schedule or percentage baked into a statute, that doesn’t mean it will automatically be implemented at that rate.

 

But again, when you’re looking at possibly paying thousands a month in alimony, you should have already invested $300 and spoken to an attorney (or 2 attorneys just to be sure) just to know your rights.

Link to post
Share on other sites
somanymistakes

In many locations the law is actually designed to make divorce as hard as possible because the local culture wants to discourage it as much as possible.

 

If divorce is amazingly expensive, that prevents people from doing it on a whim and encourages them to work things out... even if "working things out" involves them living totally separate lives in a sham marriage. This keeps the divorce rate low and makes things look like old-fashioned values are holding true, and that's all that matters to some folks who make the rules.

 

In some countries divorce is extremely easy - you can just go online and say "hey we don't want to be married anymore" and in two weeks poof, it's gone. Naturally, the divorce rate is drastically higher there!

 

As for the original question of "is it normal"... yeah, it's normal that in a divorce both parties are going to see a hit in their quality of living. It's not unusual that the family home has to be sold and both sides have to settle for living somewhere more crap and giving up a lot of the luxuries they are used to, while at the same time both falling over themselves trying to pamper the kids and buy their love.

 

 

Of course, in a truly hostile marriage, it's still cheaper to divorce because as long as you're married your spouse has the legal right to take ALL your money and spend it!

Link to post
Share on other sites
CautiouslyOptimistic
Finally in process of divorce after 20 years of marriage- We are going thru mediation but I feel I am at a point of needing lawyer. I make about 4 times the salary as she does. We have the same education (both have college degrees)- I understand the way it works in NJ- it's not based on education and earning potential but your lifestyle over 20 years (we have 3 kids)-

I'm not debating paying her - the issue is that with the calculation sheet the mediator gave us it comes out to owing her almost $3000 a month! (mostly alimony)-- when I do my budget sheet (just what i need to survive)- I am around 4500/month (mortgage-expenses etc etc)-

That exceeds my net pay for the month- Is this normal?? this is all based just on all the calculations from W2- tax statements etc.... I would have -$500.00 every month..... someone help me

 

Just because that's what the calculations say, it doesn't mean she has to demand you give her that much.

 

Being divorced is very expensive.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Author

thanks- it's been amicable but I don't see her willing to take less.... it's not a matter of paying her (I am fine with that)- it's a question of it being reasonable to live.... We have been living separately for 6 months and we both have been managing to live without me paying her anything- (I still pay car insurance and give her $$$ when she asks)- 650 a week alimony- she could buy a new BMW!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
thanks- it's been amicable but I don't see her willing to take less.... it's not a matter of paying her (I am fine with that)- it's a question of it being reasonable to live.... We have been living separately for 6 months and we both have been managing to live without me paying her anything- (I still pay car insurance and give her $$$ when she asks)- 650 a week alimony- she could buy a new BMW!!!

 

In NJ? You have 3 kids. At a minimum that requires a 2 bedroom apartment, assuming all 3 kids are the same gender. You will need a 3 bedroom apartment. I can't imagine you can get one in NJ for less than $1500 per month. If you are paying her $650 per week which is less than $3,000 per month exactly where are they living & what are they eating? No she can't afford a new BMW. Kids need shelter, clothes, medical care, fees for school, cable / internet, etc. That doesn't leave money for luxuries. If your wife does return to work you will have child care costs.

 

Things are expensive.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
thanks- it's been amicable but I don't see her willing to take less.... it's not a matter of paying her (I am fine with that)- it's a question of it being reasonable to live.... We have been living separately for 6 months and we both have been managing to live without me paying her anything- (I still pay car insurance and give her $$$ when she asks)- 650 a week alimony- she could buy a new BMW!!!

 

I'm not sure what the law is in NJ but in my jurisdiction that formula is just a recommendation or starting point.

 

Further, at least in my jurisdiction, alimony can't put you in debt. Child support can but not alimony or spousal support. Now, that does mean that the court or the attorneys will take a hard look at your monthly expenses to see what is justified.

 

As others have said - get an attorney. Also, don't feel that bad - I pay $4K/month for spousal support.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are plenty of stories around my neck of the woods were guys are working two jobs to pay the child support because the legal system is whack.

I'm one of them. When the judge asked me if I had a penis and I replied "I do indeed" the hammer came down.

 

I have my kids 6/14 days and pay half the daycare, half the health insurance, and half of the medical/school supplies.

 

I don't get a say in what school they go too, what daycare they go too, what health insurance they have so their mom buys the most expensive everything she can find just because it's only costing her 1/2 the price tag. She makes twice my salary and lives with another guy so it's pretty easy for her. I work two jobs just to stay out of jail.

 

It's still better than being married. I'll never do it again. Divorce is expensive because it's worth it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi skinut, why are you divorcing? Infidelity on either side or plain incompatibility? Would add context to your thread. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites
In NJ? You have 3 kids. At a minimum that requires a 2 bedroom apartment, assuming all 3 kids are the same gender. You will need a 3 bedroom apartment. I can't imagine you can get one in NJ for less than $1500 per month. If you are paying her $650 per week which is less than $3,000 per month exactly where are they living & what are they eating? No she can't afford a new BMW. Kids need shelter, clothes, medical care, fees for school, cable / internet, etc. That doesn't leave money for luxuries. If your wife does return to work you will have child care costs.

 

Things are expensive.

 

Hahaha, if it was as simple as cutting the check. I'm pretty confident he will still be on the hook for health insurance, 1/2 of other expenses along with whatever he spends on them while in his care.

 

Alimony is such a 60's things. I'm curious why NOW doesn't attack the idea? It's not in line with women rights, unless the right is taking advantage of men.

 

OP your best bet is reducing you balance sheet. I single man should be able to live comfortably on slightly less than $4500/mo

Link to post
Share on other sites
somanymistakes

Alimony is such a 60's things. I'm curious why NOW doesn't attack the idea? It's not in line with women rights, unless the right is taking advantage of men.

 

The term 'alimony' is largely out of fashion in a lot of places, in favor of 'spousal support'. And it is NOT just paid by men to women. There are women paying it to men as well.

 

The women having to pay support tend to be just as cranky about it as the men :laugh:

 

The concept of spousal support has also changed a lot since the old days. It used to be that a woman's income was expected to come solely from her husband, and that she would probably only be able to marry once (because who would want used goods?) so if her husband set her aside, he had to pay her for life, otherwise she'd starve. Nowadays in most cases spousal support is expected to be only temporary, to give the dependent spouse time to find another source of income.

 

The exceptions are usually if you were married for a very long time to a stay-at-home spouse. If you had a housewife for 20+ years, you are likely on the hook. But of course it varies by location as well.

 

This forum doesn't have a large number of divorce cases on it, if you go to some larger divorce-specific forums you'll find a wider range of outcomes. I can't say I know everything, but I've seen a lot of different stories play out. And a lot of dads with primary custody, for that matter.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

There are ways to get away with it otherwise courts wouldn’t be full of cases where the ex isn’t paying according to the court order.

 

Signing a settlement , making it an order of the court does not mean enforcement.

 

Speak to an attorney. They’ll tell you ways around without getting into trouble.

Link to post
Share on other sites
PegNosePete
Speak to an attorney. They’ll tell you ways around without getting into trouble.

No they won't. Unless their name is Saul Goodman.

 

They will of course, tell you how you can reduce the alimony and help you get you a better deal through the courts.

 

But lawyers have a legal obligation to uphold the law. They will not tell you ways around court orders, if they value their license to practice!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

They will of course, tell you how you can reduce the alimony and help you get you a better deal through the courts.!

 

Agree but again , if everyone was adhering to the court order then there wouldn’t be so many pending cases in the courts. Just saying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's why SCOTUS offers 'opinions' when lower court's 'opinions', 'judgments' and 'rulings' are appealed as erroneous, unsupported, over-reaching or, lately, politically incorrect. All law is open to 'interpretation'. Why? Because humans wrote it. The human with the most compelling argument and, generally, deepest pocket to enrich the system, generally 'wins', if there ever is a true winner in divorce. I personally don't think there is, only levels of losing, regardless of how hotly contested and argued and interpreted the dissolution is.

 

OP, if your wife has a history of being a team player, stability, working with you in your marriage and has demonstrated calm in this troubled time, work with that to find an equitable solution which leaves both of you relatively whole and able to equally adjust to solo life. If either spouse is destined to end up in poverty and/or lacking safety and essentials, that's something to take a hard look at. If your spouse isn't willing to work to a middle ground, as should you, then get those soldiers of the law, lawyers, geared up, armed with the strongest legal guns available, and go to war. Yeah, it sucks I know but, like real wars, sometimes it's necessary. Ugly, but necessary.

 

FWIW, my exW and I were able to find middle ground, though it did cost me about 10-15 years of my life's work before getting married, and we both moved on without becoming impoverished or substantially enriching the legal community. A little life's work spent on targeted legal help paid dividends down the road. Every marriage and every divorce is unique so you'll necessarily tailor individual actions to your particular circumstances. It will work out. Down the road, IME, accepting the death of the marriage goes a long way to moving on. If you find yourself rehashing the problems, you haven't moved on. Good luck in your journey!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Author

"justaguy"- no infidelity..... just grew apart after years but I initiated it which makes me think moreso (since she has not questioned it yet)- it more likely to not object to the numbers on the sheet

Link to post
Share on other sites
thanks- it's been amicable but I don't see her willing to take less.... it's not a matter of paying her (I am fine with that)- it's a question of it being reasonable to live.... We have been living separately for 6 months and we both have been managing to live without me paying her anything- (I still pay car insurance and give her $$$ when she asks)- 650 a week alimony- she could buy a new BMW!!!

 

That figure is steep. I always thought they calculate what you need for yourself into it all. They can't away your living expenses and basic ability to afford feeding yourself. Right?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Finally in process of divorce after 20 years of marriage- We are going thru mediation but I feel I am at a point of needing lawyer. I make about 4 times the salary as she does. We have the same education (both have college degrees)- I understand the way it works in NJ- it's not based on education and earning potential but your lifestyle over 20 years (we have 3 kids)-

I'm not debating paying her - the issue is that with the calculation sheet the mediator gave us it comes out to owing her almost $3000 a month! (mostly alimony)-- when I do my budget sheet (just what i need to survive)- I am around 4500/month (mortgage-expenses etc etc)-

That exceeds my net pay for the month- Is this normal?? this is all based just on all the calculations from W2- tax statements etc.... I would have -$500.00 every month..... someone help me

 

So you make 4X what she does and she'll have primary custody and responsibility for 3 kids? If so, you'll have to re-examine the thought that $3000/month is too much for her but you can't make it on $4500/month.

 

As others have said, time to take a careful look at your own expenses. Divorce is a lifestyle adjustment for everyone involved...

 

Mr. Lucky

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Below is the applicable portion of the alimony statute in NJ. As you can see, an award of alimony is discretionary with the judge and depends on a variety of factors. There doesn’t appear to be any kind of fixed schedule or formula for alimony in NJ. But again, I’m not a NJ attorney, so please consult a local attorney who will have much more information on what your local judges award for alimony in cases like yours.

 

Universal Citation: NJ Rev Stat § 2A:34-23 (2014)

2A:34-23 Alimony, maintenance.

 

2A:34-23.Alimony, maintenance.

 

b.In all actions brought for divorce ... the court may award one or more of the following types of alimony: open durational alimony; rehabilitative alimony; limited duration alimony or reimbursement alimony to either party. In so doing the court shall consider, but not be limited to, the following factors:

 

(1)The actual need and ability of the parties to pay;

 

(2)The duration of the marriage or civil union;

 

(3)The age, physical and emotional health of the parties;

 

(4)The standard of living established in the marriage or civil union and the likelihood that each party can maintain a reasonably comparable standard of living, with neither party having a greater entitlement to that standard of living than the other;

 

(5)The earning capacities, educational levels, vocational skills, and employability of the parties;

 

(6)The length of absence from the job market of the party seeking maintenance;

 

(7)The parental responsibilities for the children;

 

(8)The time and expense necessary to acquire sufficient education or training to enable the party seeking maintenance to find appropriate employment, the availability of the training and employment, and the opportunity for future acquisitions of capital assets and income;

 

(9)The history of the financial or non-financial contributions to the marriage or civil union by each party including contributions to the care and education of the children and interruption of personal careers or educational opportunities;

 

(10) The equitable distribution of property ordered and any payouts on equitable distribution, directly or indirectly, out of current income, to the extent this consideration is reasonable, just and fair;

 

(11) The income available to either party through investment of any assets held by that party;

 

(12) The tax treatment and consequences to both parties of any alimony award, including the designation of all or a portion of the payment as a non-taxable payment;

 

(13) The nature, amount, and length of pendente lite support paid, if any; and

 

(14) Any other factors which the court may deem relevant.

 

In each case where the court is asked to make an award of alimony, the court shall consider and assess evidence with respect to all relevant statutory factors. If the court determines that certain factors are more or less relevant than others, the court shall make specific written findings of fact and conclusions of law on the reasons why the court reached that conclusion. No factor shall be elevated in importance over any other factor unless the court finds otherwise, in which case the court shall make specific written findings of fact and conclusions of law in that regard.

Link to post
Share on other sites
BarbedFenceRider

I remember hearing a of a gentleman that was just above minimum wage. The wife quit her job during the divorce. The 1st. court ordered him to pay 4 times his yearly salary.

 

Needless to say, he told the judge...3 squares and a cot. A place to work out and watch TV. (ie....jail!) F- her!

 

Did I mention he recently became a Mexican citizen...lol Expat..No extradition. Last I heard he runs some eco-tour thing down south. does real good.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Uncle Boogie

Get the mouth piece. I am not a fan of attorneys (I believe most of the worlds ills are caused by them...just my jaded opinion), but they have done something that most of have not...study the law. They put their time, effort and years in studying their specific type of law. If confronted with a complicated job I have no knowledge, the best way to correct the issue is to reach out to an expert...whether it is a plumber, electrician, mechanic and so on. There are a lot of pitfalls, shortcuts and hurdles that are inherent within the law, so an expert should be your guide. Most times you will end up spending less money over the long run.

 

Good luck and always wear a cup...because you never know.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
×
×
  • Create New...